Greg Hibbard Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 The Sox have gone 29-11 over their last 40 games! The 2005 edition went 28-12 to start the year, and had a second 28-12 stretch from May 30th to July 17th (it became 29-12 on July 18th, but then was followed up by 3 game losing streak) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 We also won a series against Oakland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 If anyone could tell me they were feeling good going into this series with Oakland you are lying. They have owned us since 2001. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Hibbard Posted May 24, 2006 Author Share Posted May 24, 2006 (edited) They have owned us at Oakland, but I seem to remember at least winning one series at home against them in the past five years... EDIT: August 8-10 2003 Edited May 24, 2006 by Greg Hibbard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Greg Hibbard @ May 24, 2006 -> 11:08 AM) They have owned us at Oakland, but I seem to remember at least winning one series at home against them in the past five years... EDIT: August 8-10 2003 Going for first sweep since 1983. The sox are 13-34 vs the A's since 2001. Edited May 24, 2006 by RockRaines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Hibbard Posted May 24, 2006 Author Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ May 24, 2006 -> 10:09 AM) Going for first sweep since 1983. The sox are 13-34 vs the A's since 2001. we also won the series May 3-5 2002 I would venture to say that we are at least .500 at home against them since 2001... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyho7476 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ May 24, 2006 -> 11:09 AM) Going for first sweep since 1983. The sox are 13-34 vs the A's since 2001. Since '83? Holy f***. LEt's get this. Go get 'em Buerhle! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 Unfortunately, Buehrle seems to have the most trouble with them out of all of our pitchers. Am I right in saying that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamPabloOzuna Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ May 24, 2006 -> 12:31 PM) Unfortunately, Buehrle seems to have the most trouble with them out of all of our pitchers. Am I right in saying that? G GS W L SV CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA 18 14 2 8 0 2 0 95.2 97 58 44 12 29 49 4.14 1.32 .262 Buehrle lifetime against Oakland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(IamPabloOzuna @ May 24, 2006 -> 12:50 PM) G GS W L SV CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA 18 14 2 8 0 2 0 95.2 97 58 44 12 29 49 4.14 1.32 .262 Buehrle lifetime against Oakland Thanks, buddy. Welcome to Soxtalk. I loved your squeeze on Monday night. EDIT: And it's the unearned runs that kill Buehrle, once again. Edited May 24, 2006 by Milkman delivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYSox35 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ May 24, 2006 -> 12:54 PM) Thanks, buddy. Welcome to Soxtalk. I loved your squeeze on Monday night. EDIT: And it's the unearned runs that kill Buehrle, once again. Crazy how many Unearned runs there are when he pitches... Also looks like CG or bust for him vs. Oakland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 One interesting thing about Buehrle, his career "run average" is 4.11 compared to his "earned run average" of 3.60. A .51 difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYSox35 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 24, 2006 -> 01:03 PM) One interesting thing about Buehrle, his career "run average" is 4.11 compared to his "earned run average" of 3.60. A .51 difference. I'm guessing .51 is way higher than normal, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 Maybe Frank Thomas brings bad mojo to his team in the Oakland vs. Chicago series? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Greg Hibbard @ May 24, 2006 -> 04:11 PM) I would venture to say that we are at least .500 at home against them since 2001... Considering we have only beaten them in 2 series at home and neither was a sweep, I would highly doubt it. QUOTE(NYSox35 @ May 24, 2006 -> 06:05 PM) I'm guessing .51 is way higher than normal, right? That's an extra run per 2 starts. So yeah, that's a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Buehrle>Wood @ May 24, 2006 -> 01:10 PM) That's an extra run per 2 starts. So yeah, that's a lot. Its hard to say that without knowing what the league averages look like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 Well, I havn't exactly delved into it but I did compare it to someone with a very similar career ERA, in Roy Halladay. His "run average" is 4.09 compared to his ERA of 3.65 so a .44 difference. I'll try to find the league averages though because that would be the best way to compare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYSox35 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 24, 2006 -> 01:16 PM) Well, I havn't exactly delved into it but I did compare it to someone with a very similar career ERA, in Roy Halladay. His "run average" is 4.09 compared to his ERA of 3.65 so a .44 difference. I'll try to find the league averages though because that would be the best way to compare. excellent thanks...interesting stat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Greg Hibbard @ May 24, 2006 -> 04:11 PM) we also won the series May 3-5 2002 I would venture to say that we are at least .500 at home against them since 2001... Hey professor, your upside in the field of mathematics is through the roof! After looking at our 13-34 record against them since 2001, you think that we are at least .500 against them at home? So, you were thinking along these lines: 12-12 at home 1-22 on the road Does that sound right to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Hibbard Posted May 24, 2006 Author Share Posted May 24, 2006 Since the end of the 2001 season, we are 8-9 against them. I was one game off. So sue me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(Greg Hibbard @ May 24, 2006 -> 07:33 PM) Since the end of the 2001 season, we are 8-9 against them. I was one game off. So sue me. We're 5-25 in Oakland since 2001? We have played 30 games in their stadium, and only 17 games at home? I don't know, I'm too lazy to actually look into this myself. Forget that I ever said anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ May 24, 2006 -> 03:16 PM) We're 5-25 in Oakland since 2001? We have played 30 games in their stadium, and only 17 games at home? I don't know, I'm too lazy to actually look into this myself. Forget that I ever said anything. Its true, I just looked. 01 0-3 record at the Coliseum 1-5 record at home 02 0-6 record at the Coliseum 2-1 record at home 03 1-2 record at the Coliseum 3-3 record at home 04 1-5 record at the Coliseum 1-2 record at home 05 2-4 record at the coliseum 0-3 record at home Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(kyyle23 @ May 24, 2006 -> 08:29 PM) Its true, I just looked. 01 0-3 record at the Coliseum 1-5 record at home 02 0-6 record at the Coliseum 2-1 record at home 03 1-2 record at the Coliseum 3-3 record at home 04 1-5 record at the Coliseum 1-2 record at home 05 2-4 record at the coliseum 0-3 record at home Okay, 7-14 at home coming into this year, and 4-20 in Oakland. That sounds about right. Thanks for doing the research, dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ May 24, 2006 -> 01:11 PM) Its hard to say that without knowing what the league averages look like. 2006 -- 4.74 5.12 2005 -- 4.35 4.73 2004 -- 4.64 5.04 2003 -- 4.52 4.92 2002 -- 4.46 4.85 2001 -- 4.47 4.90 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted May 24, 2006 Share Posted May 24, 2006 QUOTE(hammerhead johnson @ May 24, 2006 -> 03:40 PM) Okay, 7-14 at home coming into this year, and 4-20 in Oakland. That sounds about right. Thanks for doing the research, dude. Thanks to both of you for doing it, I didnt want to even start looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.