SoxAce Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 Wow... now 100 post in here in like.. 10 minutes.. I must say I'm glad there were others who feel the way about this and are more backers than I ever thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Heads22 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:51 PM) Where is Uribe for AL SS? 19 out of 24 the only players worse than him are R Santiago from DET, Thomas Perez, Nick Green, that Figueroa guy on TOR and Ordaz from TB. Pretty f***ing pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:51 PM) Why is Ross Gload currently on this team? Instead of sending down a valuable player in order to add to the pen, why not let go of the never used Ross Gload. And that's why I think Ozzie is using scare tactics to fire him up. We're struggling to fill current pen spots with capable pitchers, let alone bringing up another MLB-ready (do we even have any?) reliever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Heads22 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:51 PM) Where is Uribe for AL SS? In on base? He's probably in 1421st place or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 28, 2006 -> 01:51 PM) Why is Ross Gload currently on this team? Instead of sending down a valuable player in order to add to the pen, why not let go of the never used Ross Gload. Thank You. Should have been done at the beginning of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Heads22 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:53 PM) Someone will need to play first if Konerko ever takes a day off, I'd rather not play Jim there. That's still an incredibly stupid reason to keep someone on the roster, if Kong needs a day off and Thome ain't gonna play the field. Guess what? Cintron, Mack or Widge get a day at 1B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 If collectively Soxtalk can come to the conclusion that BA is helping the Sox rather than hurting, let's hope the upper management who are paid to make these decisions can come to the right conclusion as well...or let's atleast hope that Brooks is checking up on us and talking to Kdubs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Hurtin Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 27, 2006 -> 11:51 PM) Why is Ross Gload currently on this team? Instead of sending down a valuable player in order to add to the pen, why not let go of the never used Ross Gload. True. They must REALLY not want to use Thome at 1st base if something were to happen with Konerko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:53 PM) We're struggling to fill current pen spots with capable pitchers, let alone bringing up another MLB-ready (do we even have any?) reliever. We have nobody in the minors ready to be in our MLB pen, and we currently have a couple guys in our MLB pen who should be in the minors, which is why this MUST be a scare tactic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:54 PM) Thank You. Should have been done at the beginning of the season. One, if not the only one who was calling for this since the beginning. Well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:54 PM) That's still an incredibly stupid reason to keep someone on the roster, if Kong needs a day off and Thome ain't gonna play the field. Guess what? Cintron, Mack or Widge get a day at 1B. Exactly. Didn't Dye play a game at 1st last year? I'm sure if Paulie needed ONE day off, we could put Dye at 1st, Mack in right, and BA in center. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:54 PM) That's still an incredibly stupid reason to keep someone on the roster, if Kong needs a day off and Thome ain't gonna play the field. Guess what? Cintron, Mack or Widge get a day at 1B. That's 9 combined career games at first. If they can do it, fine, but at least we know Ross can play first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:56 PM) Exactly. Didn't Dye play a game at 1st last year? I'm sure if Paulie needed ONE day off, we could put Dye at 1st, Mack in right, and BA in center. Actually Soxtalk decided early on last year that when Kong walked after '06, Dye would be the Sox' everyday 1B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ May 27, 2006 -> 11:56 PM) Exactly. Didn't Dye play a game at 1st last year? I'm sure if Paulie needed ONE day off, we could put Dye at 1st, Mack in right, and BA in center. That wouldn't be necessary. Mack can play 1B and 3B, but Ozzie hasn't brought him into the infield yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:57 PM) Actually Soxtalk decided early on last year that when Kong walked after '06, Dye would be the Sox' everyday 1B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 I would also like to point out, despite the fact that it could be thought of as "stirring the pot", that many of the anti-BA people in part feel that way due to their still alive man-crush on one Aaron Rowand. Just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(witesoxfan @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:54 PM) If collectively Soxtalk can come to the conclusion that BA is helping the Sox rather than hurting He has the potential to do so...all Ozzie and the rest of us impatient people probably want is just a glimmer of hope that he knows how to use his bat...maybe stringing together a few good hitting games where he looks confident at the plate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:58 PM) That wouldn't be necessary. Mack can play 1B and 3B, but Ozzie hasn't brought him into the infield yet. Even more of a point as to why the hell is Gload on the roster. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:58 PM) That wouldn't be necessary. Mack can play 1B and 3B, but Ozzie hasn't brought him into the infield yet. LIAR! Mack played an inning at 3B earlier this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 Well, a single to CF/RCF late in the game was certainly a nice place to start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 27, 2006 -> 11:59 PM) LIAR! Mack played an inning at 3B earlier this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ May 27, 2006 -> 10:59 PM) Even more of a point as to why the hell is Gload on the roster. Thank you. That still has me scratching my head. Why have him on the roster if they aren't going to play him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 If he is lighting a fire that is not exactly a good move IMO. You can already tell the guy is pressing WAY too much, why add more pressure? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted May 28, 2006 Author Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ May 27, 2006 -> 11:00 PM) I am going to go with Kal here and say that Oz is trying to light a fire under there ass, especially with Uribe and Ando... I think so too but I'm sure something will be done if they both have a bunch of 0-fers in the next few games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted May 28, 2006 Share Posted May 28, 2006 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ May 27, 2006 -> 11:00 PM) Ok, so Oz when on this rant after the game, and obviously they pulled these quotes from the rant, right? I am going to go with Kal here and say that Oz is trying to light a fire under there ass, especially with Uribe and Ando... But where is the quote about Uribe? I'm scared that he's just gonna keep putting him out there because he was a light hitting SS. Uribe has likely cost us at least 2 games in the last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.