southsider2k5 Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 We would have to endure years of gridlock. Having a third party would increase the number of political deal making to get anything though Congress. Be careful what you wish for. I'm not a huge fan of either party, but it's better than a three way mess. Now if it would result in one of the parties folding their circus tent, then maybe we have something . . . What would be even better is if the voting public would shed the party labels and not defend asshattery just because it's from "their" party or have an all or nothing approach to their party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 Short term, yes, it's "bad", but SOMETHING has to happen. Neither party stands for "mainstream America" anymore, they both have to suck the schlongs of their extremists to get the real money. It's freaking nausaiating. It's time for a REAL representation of what most of us think out here. (Special thanks to Iggy for the insight... ahem). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 11:44 AM) Short term, yes, it's "bad", but SOMETHING has to happen. Neither party stands for "mainstream America" anymore, they both have to suck the schlongs of their extremists to get the real money. It's freaking nausaiating. It's time for a REAL representation of what most of us think out here. (Special thanks to Iggy for the insight... ahem). They are reflecting mainstream America. Republicans and Democrats will defend anything their party does. We are getting what we deserve. Hear something anti-GOP? It's the liberal media. Hear something Anti-Democrat, it gets defended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 05:01 PM) They are reflecting mainstream America. Republicans and Democrats will defend anything their party does. We are getting what we deserve. Hear something anti-GOP? It's the liberal media. Hear something Anti-Democrat, it gets defended. We DESERVE this? What the **** planet are you from? We can't get any better because the corporations, etc. have bought the entire government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 11:17 AM) We DESERVE this? What the **** planet are you from? We can't get any better because the corporations, etc. have bought the entire government. You damn hippy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 1, 2006 Author Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 12:01 PM) They are reflecting mainstream America. Republicans and Democrats will defend anything their party does. We are getting what we deserve. Hear something anti-GOP? It's the liberal media. Hear something Anti-Democrat, it gets defended. Oh that's rich. Or maybe the problem is that most people lacking an alternative like themeselves latch onto the closest thing they can find, defending it because they view the alternative as even worse than their ill-fitting party choice they were forced into? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 06:22 PM) Oh that's rich. Or maybe the problem is that most people lacking an alternative like themeselves latch onto the closest thing they can find, defending it because they view the alternative as even worse than their ill-fitting party choice they were forced into? DING. They ALL suck. It's just I feel that one party sucks less then the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 No, it isn't. Well, a caveat: it's okay, IMO, if a third party pushes the issue of energy independence like the Progressives did political reform. But do we need a third party full-time to "help" govern? God no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 We don't need a third party to "help" govern, we need a third party "TO" govern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 I read this and all I can think about is this... Arise ye workers [starvelings] from your slumbers Arise ye prisoners of want For reason in revolt now thunders And at last ends the age of cant. Away with all your superstitions Servile masses arise, arise We'll change henceforth [forthwith] the old tradition [conditions] And spurn the dust to win the prize. So comrades, come rally And the last fight let us face The Internationale unites the human race. So comrades, come rally And the last fight let us face The Internationale unites the human race. No more deluded by reaction On tyrants only we'll make war The soldiers too will take strike action They'll break ranks and fight no more And if those cannibals keep trying To sacrifice us to their pride They soon shall hear the bullets flying We'll shoot the generals on our own side. No saviour from on high delivers No faith have we in prince or peer Our own right hand the chains must shiver Chains of hatred, greed and fear E'er the thieves will out with their booty [give up their booty] And give to all a happier lot. Each [those] at the forge must do their duty And we'll strike while the iron is hot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonxctf Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 decisions are made by those who show up. so anyone, and I mean anyone, who sits and b****es, moans, complains about the government without voting themselves is a complete hypocrite. we do have the power here. we just choose to not utilize it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(jasonxctf @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 09:06 PM) decisions are made by those who show up. so anyone, and I mean anyone, who sits and b****es, moans, complains about the government without voting themselves is a complete hypocrite. we do have the power here. we just choose to not utilize it. People are made to believe that they have the power, but do they really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 02:25 PM) People are made to believe that they have the power, but do they really? Only once they reach an income level such that they can afford their own lobbyist and max-donations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 02:00 PM) We don't need a third party to "help" govern, we need a third party "TO" govern. I stand by my previous statement. No one party governs the entire nation unless they control both the Active branches (non-Judicial) by over sixty members in the Senate, to block ANY filibuster. Otherwise, they all have to work each other and help one another by passing bills along, joining in coalitions, etc. etc. If you think any one party should fully govern, then go right ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 03:12 PM) I stand by my previous statement. No one party governs the entire nation unless they control both the Active branches (non-Judicial) by over sixty members in the Senate, to block ANY filibuster. Otherwise, they all have to work each other and help one another by passing bills along, joining in coalitions, etc. etc. If you think any one party should fully govern, then go right ahead. We've been about as close as you can possibly get without being all the way there for these last 4 years, and look where that's gotten us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSHAWKS Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 05:12 PM) I stand by my previous statement. No one party governs the entire nation unless they control both the Active branches (non-Judicial) by over sixty members in the Senate, to block ANY filibuster. Otherwise, they all have to work each other and help one another by passing bills along, joining in coalitions, etc. etc. If you think any one party should fully govern, then go right ahead. The filibuster is a useless governing mechanism because the democrats don't have the stones to use it. For instance, when an idealogue like Sam Alito(aka Anton Scalia Jr.) was nominated to the Supreme Court. Edited June 1, 2006 by MSHAWKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 01:17 PM) We DESERVE this? What the **** planet are you from? We can't get any better because the corporations, etc. have bought the entire government. I'm on the planet where one party screams media bias whenever they f*** up and it gets reported. Then most of their supporters agree. Instead of them looking at the facts, they look at which newspapers are reporting it and look for ways to discredit the report. I'm on the planet where the other party will defend the President of the United States when he has an intern giving him a blow job outside the oval office. Where capturing Bin Laden is secondary to deciding which President f***ed up. We aren't demanding our own parties shape up, we are just looking for a chance to blow some mole hill into a mountain and "get" the other party. The planet I would like to be on is the one that demands from their own party good government. That when their party f***s up, they don't blame the reporter, they blame the douchebag politician. When loyal party members stand up and tell their guys to act like leaders or else they will vote someone in, things will change. I want to be on a planet where the politicians honor the other branches, not try and surplant the constitution by labeling anyone who disagrees as a "Activist Judge" or a liberal or conservative wacko. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 10:50 AM) We would have to endure years of gridlock. Having a third party would increase the number of political deal making to get anything though Congress. Be careful what you wish for. I'm not a huge fan of either party, but it's better than a three way mess. Now if it would result in one of the parties folding their circus tent, then maybe we have something . . . What would be even better is if the voting public would shed the party labels and not defend asshattery just because it's from "their" party or have an all or nothing approach to their party. A few years of political gridlock might be just the ticket. These two poor excuses of of political parties, so called representives of the American people, are so busy scratching each others back behind closed doors that they don't know how to properly represent the American people any more. Rob the blind, yes. Represent, no. Yes, put a third party, with a third of the power, in Washington. Let the political gravy train come to a grinding halt. Then, we'll get to see who really wants to represent Joe & Jane Citizen. When things come to halt, the stuff that matters to the people will be the only thing that can get accomplished. When the people care enough about something, and nothing is getting done, they'll have to listen. Right now, they can put fiasco legislatation out and say they are doing something, but they aren't doing s*** FOR the American people. Just TO us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IggyD Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 1, 2006 -> 02:00 PM) We don't need a third party to "help" govern, we need a third party "TO" govern. DING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 QUOTE(YASNY @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 02:31 AM) A few years of political gridlock might be just the ticket. These two poor excuses of of political parties, so called representives of the American people, are so busy scratching each others back behind closed doors that they don't know how to properly represent the American people any more. Rob the blind, yes. Represent, no. Yes, put a third party, with a third of the power, in Washington. Let the political gravy train come to a grinding halt. Then, we'll get to see who really wants to represent Joe & Jane Citizen. When things come to halt, the stuff that matters to the people will be the only thing that can get accomplished. When the people care enough about something, and nothing is getting done, they'll have to listen. Right now, they can put fiasco legislatation out and say they are doing something, but they aren't doing s*** FOR the American people. Just TO us. You are much more optimistic than I. The budget has to pass, to get it to pass, the gravy train would be out of control getting enough votes. We'd see more pork than a Jimmy Dean sausage factory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 07:21 PM) You are much more optimistic than I. The budget has to pass, to get it to pass, the gravy train would be out of control getting enough votes. We'd see more pork than a Jimmy Dean sausage factory. You may be right. But, what we have now totally sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 QUOTE(YASNY @ Jun 3, 2006 -> 02:31 AM) You may be right. But, what we have now totally sucks. I know Kap will disgaree, but to fix this we need Dems to fix Dems and Reps to fix Reps. Not make excuses, but grab back their parties. Until then, we get what we deserve. Too many will vote for a douchbag from their party instead of a person of higher character from the other. And I believe we are better off with elected leaders of high character over politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 3, 2006 Author Share Posted June 3, 2006 QUOTE(Texsox @ Jun 3, 2006 -> 05:24 AM) I know Kap will disgaree, but to fix this we need Dems to fix Dems and Reps to fix Reps. Not make excuses, but grab back their parties. Until then, we get what we deserve. Too many will vote for a douchbag from their party instead of a person of higher character from the other. And I believe we are better off with elected leaders of high character over politics. LOL. Who was the last "person of higher character" who made it onto a Presidential Election ballot for the two major parties? Maybe Bob Dole? Michael Dukakis? Jimmy Carter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 One of the few things the Democrats and Republicans can agree on is no 3rd party. I'd love to see this happen but I just don't see it happening for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts