Jump to content

6/2/06: Rangers @ SOX


Heads22

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 641
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 3, 2006 -> 11:12 AM)
Huge out for Garland there. Blalock could have put us in a lot of trouble.

Jon's battling right now, and he's going to give up a few big hits.

 

But if he can get the important outs like right there, he can still keep us in this ballgame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JimH
Garland just has no chance against these hitters of keeping them down. For a sinker ball pitcher, he throws way too many pitches up in the zone.

 

I have noticed a change in his approach tonite, yes he's leaving too much up but he's making a conscious effort to bust these guys on the hands ... which is a good thing. He just cannot make mistakes against this team though. He almost needs to pitch and locate perfectly, he hasn't been pitching that well combined with these guys being good hitters. He definitely can't walk guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(aboz56 @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 08:13 PM)
My main question is how the Garland apologists can defend a 6+ era now that its June?

 

Just wondering.

He had 2 good outings in the playoffs last year, leave him alone you bully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 08:12 PM)
Huge out for Garland there. Blalock could have put us in a lot of trouble.

He has escaped now, but you know as well as everyone here the chances of Garland holding the Rangers at 2 runs is practically impossible.

 

Garland is best early in games. As we've seen in recent starts, several times through the lineup players eventually catch onto him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 09:15 PM)
Garland is best early in games. As we've seen in recent starts, several times through the lineup players eventually catch onto him.

By catching onto him, he means they kick the living crap out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(JimH @ Jun 3, 2006 -> 01:14 AM)
I have noticed a change in his approach tonite, yes he's leaving too much up but he's making a conscious effort to bust these guys on the hands ... which is a good thing. He just cannot make mistakes against this team though. He almost needs to pitch and locate perfectly, he hasn't been pitching that well combined with these guys being good hitters. He definitely can't walk guys.

 

I always thought his change-up was more effective when he'd use it against righties (goes against textbook baseball). Garland gets burned on his changeup more than any other pitch, which is unacceptable for a sinker baller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 3, 2006 -> 11:15 AM)
He has escaped now, but you know as well as everyone here the chances of Garland holding the Rangers at 2 runs is practically impossible.

 

Garland is best early in games. As we've seen in recent starts, several times through the lineup players eventually catch onto him.

So far this season, from pitch count 16-30 Jon has a 9.64 ERA, and then from 31-45 a 4.00 ERA. Once he reaches 76 pitches though, the ERA goes right back up there though.

 

So hopefully he can settle down for the next couple of innings, because this season pitch count wise, this is where he's had success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(aboz56 @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 08:16 PM)
By catching onto him, he means they kick the living crap out of him.

Yes. And by that time, we can hear " Atleast Garland pitched well for 5 innings. Just got away from him in the 6th."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 07:18 PM)
Pods has been struggling when he hasn't been walking recently. He's something like 1 for his last 14.

 

Didn't he have a few walks the other night?

 

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jun 2, 2006 -> 07:20 PM)
HEY! A MOTHER f***ING HIT!

 

OH NOES! AJ with a RISP, inning over.

 

:( It's sad because it's true. It's a freaking unreal split.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...