Jump to content

Game Thread: 6/7/06. Sox-Tigers, Contreras-Verlander, 7:05 start


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 673
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 12:48 AM)
It does not look like that ball would have gone out, it just kind of went through the glove.

 

It definitely changed the trajectory of the ball a little downwards. If you look where his glove was when he touched it, it would have been very close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(AbeFroman @ Jun 7, 2006 -> 07:48 PM)
I'd hold off on calling it a BIG loss...

 

just a loss will suffice. I mean, the guy is hitting .237

He's one of their more consistent power threats and he'll probably be replaced with Gomez in LF with DaMeatTree still on the DL they need Thames at DH. I'd say it's a big loss but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 7, 2006 -> 05:50 PM)
You know I blame Ozzie for everything....but I don't blame him for not playing Anderson.

Anderson's bat vs. Verlander's fast ball right now? Mack isn't that good right now either, but at least he might make contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Wedge @ Jun 7, 2006 -> 07:49 PM)
Is he on Grimsley's list?

 

By the way, if Grimsley was on ampetamines, why the hell does he throw the slowest games in the league?

 

He's as bad as Mike Hargrove. You could read Tolstoy in between his pitches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 12:52 AM)
Pods should have scored that inning. No excuses.

 

He probably wouldn't have scored, but Pods wasn't exactly busting his ass out of the batters box on his triple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...