Jump to content

Tigers @ White Sox, Game Thread


NYSox35

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 503
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 02:11 AM)
so if we were in the playoffs u rather have mark/cont/vazquez and then gar pitchin vs. mark/cont./freddy(playoff stud) and then vazquez? jeez

i dont care if freddy is 14-10 4.50 or somethng if in the playoffs he pitches like last yr.

 

I don't want the finesse Freddy. You have to make the playoffs before you can worry about the rotation. If you have bad pitchers like Garcia, and Garland going 40 pct of your games, good luck making the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(jphat007 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:12 PM)
I thought Garland threw the ball pretty well tonight. A stupid walk to Shelton and a good piece of hitting by Polanco gave up 2 runs. Then he got blooped to death in the 6th before he made a bad pitch to THames. He really only had one bad pitch that whole inning.

It's amazing how many Garland apologists there are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(jphat007 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 02:12 AM)
I thought Garland threw the ball pretty well tonight. A stupid walk to Shelton and a good piece of hitting by Polanco gave up 2 runs. Then he got blooped to death in the 6th before he made a bad pitch to THames. He really only had one bad pitch that whole inning.

 

He wasn't as bad as he's been...but he still had his "Judy" issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:11 PM)
so if we were in the playoffs u rather have mark/cont/vazquez and then gar pitchin vs. mark/cont./freddy(playoff stud) and then vazquez? jeez

i dont care if freddy is 14-10 4.50 or somethng if in the playoffs he pitches like last yr.

 

Last year Freddy was throwing 93, this year he's lucky to touch 90.

 

Hopefully you are right and Freddy gets his velocity back... Sox need him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:12 PM)
I don't want the finesse Freddy. You have to make the playoffs before you can worry about the rotation. If you have bad pitchers like Garcia, and Garland going 40 pct of your games, good luck making the playoffs.

i dont know, i simply was just trying to say that w/the way gar has pitched this year and throughout his career, that i dont think it would make any sense at all to keep gar over freddy who is proven throughout his career and is a big game pitcher.

18 in a row :headshake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 08:12 PM)
I don't want the finesse Freddy. You have to make the playoffs before you can worry about the rotation. If you have bad pitchers like Garcia, and Garland going 40 pct of your games, good luck making the playoffs.

 

Garcia has 9 quality starts in 12 chances this season. That is bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW...this was one of the reasons that I thought the Rogers signing was great for the Tigers. He's always given us trouble.

 

QUOTE(jphat007 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 02:15 AM)
Garcia has 9 quality starts in 12 chances this season. That is bad?

 

Yep...if he keeps pitching like the way he's doing, his ERA is going to be above 5 for the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(illinilaw08 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:13 PM)
Last year Freddy was throwing 93, this year he's lucky to touch 90.

 

Hopefully you are right and Freddy gets his velocity back... Sox need him.

has freddy simply lost his velocity? i dont understand why hes trying to be gregg maddux, all of the sudden out of no where. ill take finesse freddy over s***ty garland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:16 PM)
BTW...this was one of the reasons that I thought the Rogers signing was great for the Tigers. He's always given us trouble.

Yep...if he keeps pitching like the way he's doing, his ERA is going to be above 5 for the season.

 

 

Rogers pitched well last yr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:13 PM)
It's amazing how many Garland apologists there are.

It's been this way for his last several starts.

 

Whether it's the Toronto start, or Cleveland, or tonite, he apparently is "blooped" to death. Or, is the recepient of bad luck, bad umpiring, or bad defense behind him. Just remember, his stuff is just as good as last season. That should keep his supporters latched on for just a little bit longer. Until they realize he's simply not that good, and certaintly not deserving of the contract he received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(jphat007 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:17 PM)
LOL. I'm the farthest thing from a Garland apologist. But whatever. He threw the ball pretty well tonight.

His ERA for the game was 9.00. You should increase your expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 08:18 PM)
His ERA for the game was 9.00. You should increase your expectations.

 

Yah. That's the way to judge how a pitcher pitched on a night. He did not pitch well in Toronto, but he pitched well tonight. His defense let him down.

 

Jose pitched well last night, but if the final pitch he threw is a foot more to the left or the right do you say he didn't pitch well? It goes beyond results.

Edited by jphat007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...