Ndgt10 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Quick observation....we need to change our approach against lefties. We had a great approach in the first inning until Cora f***ed us over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 08:56 PM) DJ continues to talk about the good pitching performance by Garland. And now Hawk's blaming the umpire. I haven't seen Garland throw one pitch that I thought was a strike, but called a ball. Hawk sounds stupid blaming umps tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerfan Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Garland is at 122 pitches right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Jon's ERA back up to 6.22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Quick observation....we need to change our approach against lefties. They need to pick one side of the plate or the other with this guy. No one can cover the whole plate on this guy, unless he's totally off and that's rare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Yayyyyy, a scoreless inning from Garland. That's like 3 today. He's getting better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndgt10 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Garland is at 122 pitches right now. Let him throw until his arm falls off. I can't even be sarcastic about Garland anymore. I f***ing hate him and his pussy ass mentality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(SoxHawk1980 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 06:57 PM) "For whatever reason"??? I have a reason for you: his career. Look at the various years of his career. He has a bunch of mediocre years, ONE GOOD YEAR and then this crappy year. How does one good year make him a good pitcher? On the contrary, he has proven that he is at best a mediocre pitcher. See, now logically this is just stupid. Garland hasn't proven anything, good or bad. He's proven he's having an awfully s***ty start to this season, and he proved that he had a great start to last season. I'm certainly not going to be dumb enough to sit here and say Garland will have an ERA over 6 the rest of his life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Well....even if we go on to lose this game, I'm still happy with this series. In all honesty, we could have easily lost all three games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(SoxHawk1980 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 08:57 PM) "For whatever reason"??? I have a reason for you: his career. Look at the various years of his career. He has a bunch of mediocre years, ONE GOOD YEAR and then this crappy year. How does one good year make him a good pitcher? On the contrary, he has proven that he is at best a mediocre pitcher. No question which starter will be packaged away in off season, with any luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Interesting to see Jose and Jon's next starts. Ozzie let them both pitch over 120. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 08:56 PM) DJ continues to talk about the good pitching performance by Garland. And now Hawk's blaming the umpire. I haven't seen Garland throw one pitch that I thought was a strike, but called a ball. i hate it when someone on the sox gives up 5+ runs and ozzie or hawk/dj say they pitched/threw the ball good. i bet ozzies gunn say that today. i dont give a s*** if they had great stuff, struck out 10 or whatever:5+ runs is a lot and all that matters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 01:59 AM) See, now logically this is just stupid. Garland hasn't proven anything, good or bad. He's proven he's having an awfully s***ty start to this season, and he proved that he had a great start to last season. I'm certainly not going to be dumb enough to sit here and say Garland will have an ERA over 6 the rest of his life. Garland is such a headcase. Until he learns to keep the ball in the park, he's going to continue to struggle. He's on a record pace for homers allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndgt10 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 No question which starter will be packaged away in off season, with any luck! We should have packaged Garland's ass after his fluke year last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 01:59 AM) No question which starter will be packaged away in off season, with any luck! Yep....Buehrle to the Cardinals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 The whole team has been bad tonite, and guess what, same old problem ... lack of execution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 08:54 PM) If we lose this game it's not the end of the season. s***, we still have time to come back anyway. I know I'm not upset. This typical bed-wetting pitching performance from Garland isn't unexpected in my mind. Before the series began I said 2/3 would be acceptable. Everyone should have realized of the matchups entering this three-game set, tonight's presented the most trouble. Honestly, any matchup of an average to above average starter against Garland isn't favorable for us. Wait until the day Santana or Liriano opposes Garland. Talk about a guaranteed defeat.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:00 PM) We should have packaged Garland's ass after his fluke year last year. I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(JimH @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 02:01 AM) The whole team has been bad tonite, and guess what, same old problem ... lack of execution. We have to find a way to get Ozuna in the lineup vs lefties. The worst thing to come out of this game is a possible injury to Crede. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndgt10 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Nice job Uribe. Another f***ing first pitch pop up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeoriaSoxFan Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Anybody see this today in the Sun Times. It is hard to argue to much for BA, other than the fact that our other guy can't play CF. THE DEEP SIX Only six players who have more than 100 at-bats are hitting below .200 as of Wednesday. Player Team AVG Rondell White Minn. .193 Jason Lane Hous. .192 Neifi Perez CUBS .192 Aubrey Huff T.B. .182 Tomas Perez T.B. .173 Brian Anderson SOX .158 Source: MLB.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:00 PM) We should have packaged Garland's ass after his fluke year last year. i hope the sox arent stupid and let freddy leave or trade him. we all know mac is gunna be in the rotation, gar better be the one gone. freddy may not be having a great yr or may not be that good, but hes a stud in the playoffs. ill take my chances w/contreras,garcia,buehrle in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxHawk1980 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 See, now logically this is just stupid. Garland hasn't proven anything, good or bad. He's proven he's having an awfully s***ty start to this season, and he proved that he had a great start to last season. I'm certainly not going to be dumb enough to sit here and say Garland will have an ERA over 6 the rest of his life. How many mediocre or worse years do you need to have before you have proven yourself? He's had a bunch of mediocre or worse years and ONE GOOD YEAR. How long does he have to do this before people admit that this is who he is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 ONE GOOD YEAR That one good year resulted in a World championship, chicago's first since 1846. For that I like him and give him a break until he starts the season 0-9 like the Royals' s*** ass pitchers. Shoot me. I like him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Jun 8, 2006 -> 09:02 PM) Nice job Uribe. Another f***ing first pitch pop up. 16 consecutive outs and that's the one that bothers you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts