Jump to content

Game Thread: 6/9, 7:35pm vs Indians


Recommended Posts

QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 10:05 PM)
It's going to be fun watching our offense hit against Sabathia tomorrow.

 

Could someone explain what "ball 4, base hit" means again?

 

Basically, Hawk means ball 4 "or" base hit. He's saving words I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 474
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 10:05 PM)
It's going to be fun watching our offense hit against Sabathia tomorrow.

 

Could someone explain what "ball 4, base hit" means again?

 

Isn't it self explanatory? He wants the guy to reach base via walk or hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(JimH @ Jun 10, 2006 -> 03:04 AM)
Yeah sure, whatever you say.

 

You know you said Thornton was a better matchup, when in fact you never thought that a good offspeed pitch vs. Hafner is what's needed.

 

You really need to stop all your 2nd guessing when you really don't know.

 

I never said s*** about the offspeed pitch. I think Thornton has a terrible offspeed pitch. However, I thought he had enough velocity to be able to throw it by Hafner upstairs. When it comes to our bullpen, lets just be happy they got a guy out. I'm not blaming this on Ozzie in any shape or form though. This team just isn't good right now besides Dye and Jenks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 10:00 PM)
Man, do we have low expectations for our pitchers this year. Vazquez gave up like 50 runners in this game. He pitched with balls...but he had his work cut out for him.

 

I only have low expectations for Garland, although I've only got mild expectations of Garcia.

 

It was the fact that Vazquez pitched through his hit batsmen and all the runners that I was proud of him. But I am somewhat biased, as he and Contreras are my personal favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it self explanatory? He wants the guy to reach base via walk or hit.

 

Or it could be interpreted ball 4 with the present hitter, then basehit by the ondeck hitter. So no, I don't think it is self explanatory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Ndgt10 @ Jun 9, 2006 -> 10:08 PM)
Or it could be interpreted ball 4 with the present hitter, then basehit by the ondeck hitter. So no, I don't think it is self explanatory.

No. It could not be interpreted as that unless you just started following baseball this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...