Jump to content

Bush & War numbers going up


minors

Recommended Posts

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 02:54 PM)
Well Thanks but maybe I should change a some of the words because I certainly do not want to sound like her

Ann Coulter :finger

If it's any consolation, I've never heard her use the word "hippies" or "hippie" ;)

 

Do you hate Coulter because of that comment she made to a Vietnam Veteran who had opposed the war and had lost his legs, where she said, "It's people like you that cost us the war!"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 02:00 PM)
Booo...that one was humorous and didn't come off as arrogant...most of minors' posts have been about how unbelievably amazing of a job republicans do anyways...

 

Yeah, sheesh, you give a guy God-like Mod powers and all of a sudden it goes to his head and he gets all thread Nazi. :headshake

 

;) ;) ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ruin the party? Their plan will never be used. If they ever have a plan on Iraq they'll only be able to use it when they're in power. And that means at least waiting til 2008 if I have any idea how the American system works. Their so-called plans are only about making political hay and are probably not realistic. The situation is so much more complicated then either cutting and running or staying the course. The implications are global and increased terrorist attacks on the home soil should probably be a secondary thought at this point. And really probably have virtually no connection to the Iraq War.

 

 

The war could still be on going in 08. Iraq is a country which supports Terrorism and it needed to dealt with. And by 2008 we could be at war with Libya, North Korea or Iran or all of them who knows, but a cut and run strategy in this war on terror could and most likely lead to another attack if that were to happen while a lib was in office the party could be dealt a huge blow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 24, 2006 -> 01:14 AM)
The war could still be on going in 08. Iraq is a country which supports Terrorism and it needed to dealt with. And by 2008 we could be at war with Libya, North Korea or Iran or all of them who knows, but a cut and run strategy in this war on terror could and most likely lead to another attack if that were to happen while a lib was in office the party could be dealt a huge blow.

 

I recommend that we add a new nation to the "countries we could be at war with" list, but this country is one we absolutely should be at War with. It's a new addition, and I don't believe that many people have talked it up yet as the threat that it is but I, being a foreign policy visionary, will. I am talking about Peru. We've got to invade Peru. It is paramount to American survival. Now think about it -- Osama bin Laden has evaded capture. We didn't find Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. It might seem unrelated to you, but that's because you've not the subtlety to understand. Those WMD didn't just get up and leave by themselves -- it was bin Laden who took them! I'm not sure exactly how, but intelligence suggests that he hid them in his beard. Osama's calculation was that the United States would look foolish because of the whole debacle, and he knew that only in Machu Picchu Peru could he be safe. He figured that, hey, nobody pays attention to that part of the World as it is, and there he went.

 

It makes more sense than going to war with a nuclear North Korea, a country like Iraq but for one letter, and, frankly, I haven't got a clue why we'd ever attack Libya, considering that Bush considers it one of his greatest peaceful accomplishments. (Not that they really had much of a program to begin with: http://www.slate.com/id/2103989/ )

 

So let's hop to it, and git 'er done: WMD in Peru, and bin Laden too! shall be our war cry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 24, 2006 -> 01:14 AM)
The war could still be on going in 08. Iraq is a country which supports Terrorism and it needed to dealt with. And by 2008 we could be at war with Libya, North Korea or Iran or all of them who knows, but a cut and run strategy in this war on terror could and most likely lead to another attack if that were to happen while a lib was in office the party could be dealt a huge blow.

 

Could be going on in '08? Try could be still going in in '88.

 

Yah cause cutting and running and being struck maybe once or twice in the next 20 years by terrorists would be much worse than being at War with North Korea, Iran and Syria.

 

War on terror, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 23, 2006 -> 12:34 PM)
Bush approval gained the last 4 days and up 44% and the war have also climbes. This is good news and good news for conservative candidates who should win big in November.

President Bush :cheers

 

 

oh sweet irony:

 

take a look at this post made by Minors not more than two weeks ago:

 

 

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 11, 2006 -> 12:49 PM)
Your right I should tone it down a little but it just seems to me that liberals are disappointed that we got this guy because it is a victory for President Bush and might hurt there poll numbers. Wars should not be about poll numbers and that is why I snapped.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh sweet irony:

 

take a look at this post made by Minors not more than two weeks ago:

 

 

Well it was started by liberals and how he was declining of course everyone said it was such great news so I am certainly going to use it to my advantage. Seems like liberals can't handle the numbers so they have to attack the messenger which is a typical liberal tactic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 25, 2006 -> 10:53 PM)
Well it was started by liberals and how he was declining of course everyone said it was such great news so I am certainly going to use it to my advantage. Seems like liberals can't handle the numbers so they have to attack the messenger which is a typical liberal tactic

 

In that whole post I didn't see anything in response to what Abe said. All I see is more liberal bashing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that whole post I didn't see anything in response to what Abe said. All I see is more liberal bashing.

 

Why don't you stay away from this forum, you really have no clue on politics. This is not an insult just so the mods know. But seriously you are so far out of the real world it isn't funny so as a helpful hint please either get some idea on politics or leave the debating to the experts. Again not meant to be an insult

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 26, 2006 -> 01:07 AM)
Why don't you stay away from this forum, you really have no clue on politics. This is not an insult just so the mods know. But seriously you are so far out of the real world it isn't funny so as a helpful hint please either get some idea on politics or leave the debating to the experts. Again not meant to be an insult

 

I do believe you've been warned to tone it down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 25, 2006 -> 11:07 PM)
Why don't you stay away from this forum, you really have no clue on politics. This is not an insult just so the mods know. But seriously you are so far out of the real world it isn't funny so as a helpful hint please either get some idea on politics or leave the debating to the experts. Again not meant to be an insult

 

What have I ever said to warrant that statement. I would like to know because it is baffling me, I know I am not an expert on politics and never said so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 26, 2006 -> 01:07 AM)
Why don't you stay away from this forum, you really have no clue on politics. This is not an insult just so the mods know. But seriously you are so far out of the real world it isn't funny so as a helpful hint please either get some idea on politics or leave the debating to the experts. Again not meant to be an insult

 

You're a f***in momo. There's an insult for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a f***in momo. There's an insult for you.

 

 

Same to you

 

Could be going on in '08? Try could be still going in in '88.

 

Yah cause cutting and running and being struck maybe once or twice in the next 20 years by terrorists would be much worse than being at War with North Korea, Iran and Syria.

 

War on terror, lol.

 

 

Well to someone from Canada I guess it wouldn't matter what would they want with that place anyway. But here in America we do care if 50K people are killed in the homeland by terrorists.

 

What have I ever said to warrant that statement. I would like to know because it is baffling me, I know I am not an expert on politics and never said so.

 

Again I didn't mean it to be an insult, I agree I should have said it better it just seems like you think you know everything and you don't. I will say it again it is not an INSULT just a suggestion so take it easy.

 

I do believe you've been warned to tone it down

 

 

 

I don't believe I said anything offensive, I am sorry you took it that way I said it was not an insult several times. I have been called much worse on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 26, 2006 -> 01:07 AM)
Why don't you stay away from this forum, you really have no clue on politics. This is not an insult just so the mods know. But seriously you are so far out of the real world it isn't funny so as a helpful hint please either get some idea on politics or leave the debating to the experts. Again not meant to be an insult

 

You are treading on thin ice. Adding the phrase "Again not meant to be an insult" doesn't mitigate the fact that clearly, those are insults. Next personal attack in this thread by anyone, and its closed. Further actions possible as well.

 

QUOTE(KipWellsFan @ Jun 26, 2006 -> 01:31 AM)
You're a f***in momo. There's an insult for you.

 

Um... I have no idea what a momo is, but I'm pretty sure you aren't helping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(minors @ Jun 26, 2006 -> 12:53 AM)
Well it was started by liberals and how he was declining of course everyone said it was such great news so I am certainly going to use it to my advantage. Seems like liberals can't handle the numbers so they have to attack the messenger which is a typical liberal tactic

 

Attack the messenger? All I did was take two posts, THAT YOU WROTE, and compared them.

 

That's fair game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...