Leonard Zelig Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 I hope so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 just another example of the man trying to keep poor barry down... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 Personally, I don't like Bonds. I think he's an ass. I don't understand this witch hunt to try and send him to prison however. What is that going to accomplish? I think the government should be using its resources keeping people who are dangers to society off the streets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted July 11, 2006 Share Posted July 11, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Jul 11, 2006 -> 04:58 PM) Personally, I don't like Bonds. I think he's an ass. I don't understand this witch hunt to try and send him to prison however. What is that going to accomplish? I think the government should be using its resources keeping people who are dangers to society off the streets. Witch hunt to send him to prison? I hate that term because it's used so god damned much in inappropriate scenarios. Barry Bonds isn't innocent of anything. He's a steroid abusing woman beater with the nastiest attitude in baseball of all the players whose bad attitudes are well known. It isn't a witchhunt to try and prove that he's guilty of perjury, obstructing justice, income tax invasion and whatever the f*** else that pervert has done. It's a serious crime to lie to a grand jury. Perjury is a crime that fundamentally assaults our justice system. "Witchhunt" my ass. I think that only one group can credibly be called out for "witchhunt[ing]" him, and that's the guys at the SF Chronicle, the newspaper that devoted so many resources and time to find out what he was using, and when. And, personally, I wish more newspapers would do that to more people, in sports and ESPECIALLY out. But I call bulls*** on the witchhunt. I don't think what they did was a witchhunt, but I guess you could call it that. Edit: Actually, I think that's BS, too. I take that back. I don't think you can credibly say that a newspaper doing its job was witchhunting. Edited July 11, 2006 by Gregory Pratt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 -Put him in jail. -Fine the living s*** out of him. -Wipe out his records. -Ban him from baseball without possibility of reinstatement. That should about do for this scumbag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phuck the Cubs Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 (edited) A lifetime ban and wiping all his numbers would be enough, IMO. Edited July 12, 2006 by Cuck the Fubs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 QUOTE(Cuck the Fubs @ Jul 11, 2006 -> 10:51 PM) A lifetime ban and wiping all his numbers would be enough, IMO. 'Fraid not. According to that article he lied to a Federal Grand Jury. That's a felony boys and girls and he needs to get put away for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted July 12, 2006 Share Posted July 12, 2006 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 11, 2006 -> 06:39 PM) I think that only one group can credibly be called out for "witchhunt[ing]" him, and that's the guys at the SF Chronicle, the newspaper that devoted so many resources and time to find out what he was using, and when. And, personally, I wish more newspapers would do that to more people, in sports and ESPECIALLY out. But I call bulls*** on the witchhunt. I don't think what they did was a witchhunt, but I guess you could call it that. Edit: Actually, I think that's BS, too. I take that back. I don't think you can credibly say that a newspaper doing its job was witchhunting. I think the newspaper was just conducting some high quality investigative reporting, which more media outlets need to do instead of regurgitating each others news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.