SouthSidePride05 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 After that bad inning by Buerhle, it was basically over.. again. That one bad inning is killing us, and it doesn't help when the lineup is in a mental slump. This sucks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(JimH @ Jul 22, 2006 -> 03:10 AM) Well I'm not going to go back and research your posts but you know and I know you have been beating the drum for at least two years now about Cotts being good vs. righthanded hitters, and why doesn't Ozzie leave him in for the whole inning. How about just admitting it for once? As for leaving Cotts in, they were down by 3 runs already so I can see why he did it. Its funny how on your previous post you said that it is more important for some people on here to be correct than for the sox to win. Yet, you are doing the exact same thing trying to insult and challenge Fathom. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Them damn Rangers are using lights on the scoreboard again. Crafty devils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:12 PM) Words mean things, but whatever. I'm not going to get into a pissing contest with you. Have you ever heard the term "heat of the moment"? Apparently not. Why are you obsessed with me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(JimH @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:07 PM) He was right, sometimes it seems it's more important for people to be right on this site vs. the White Sox winning. Further IMO there was no need for your post just to rub it in his face. Totally not necessary. Again IMO. Yeah, sometimes certain things seem to occur on Soxtalk. That's inevitable with several hundred consistent posters. I could say it "seems" certain posters can't handle criticism of their ballclub. I did mock him. I won't deny it. He could have made his point without sounding like a whining child. Telling us how the website is going in a wrong direction, and he's not going to be a part of it -- like a message board can honestly affect someones like to that extent. I'm sorry if I don't feel sympathy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(JimH @ Jul 22, 2006 -> 03:10 AM) Well I'm not going to go back and research your posts but you know and I know you have been beating the drum for at least two years now about Cotts being good vs. righthanded hitters, and why doesn't Ozzie leave him in for the whole inning. How about just admitting it for once? As for leaving Cotts in, they were down by 3 runs already so I can see why he did it. You're right that I say Cotts should be allowed to start an inning once in a while. He's good enough where he should be allowed the right to get 3 outs on his own in an inning. Against a tough righty though who has seen Cotts before and done well vs him, I don't think he should still be in. We have 3 very good non-closer relievers in Cotts, McCarthy, and Thornton. All 3 of them should be allowed to be more than just one batter relievers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:13 PM) Have you ever heard the term "heat of the moment"? Apparently not. Why are you obsessed with me? Since when was replying to something incredibly stupid someone said the equivelant of an obsession? "Heat of the moment" doesn't quite work out well as an excuse on the Internet, either, unless you're a chimpanzee banging on keys. You've got a moment to think about what you're going to type, time to type it, and then the "submit" button to click. It's not like you were sitting around a coffee table and suddenly said, "SHOOT, I HATE THIS!" I'm so not obsessed with you that I'm going to put you on ignore now. Farewell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(SouthSidePride05 @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:13 PM) After that bad inning by Buerhle, it was basically over.. again. That one bad inning is killing us, and it doesn't help when the lineup is in a mental slump. This sucks! It kills the team mentally. I mean everything wasn't going too bad then "here we go again." The way their playing right now is comparable to last seasons rough stretch. All the pressure builds up and everyone tries to get the big hit. According to Hawk though, Guillen is the cure to everything in the clubhouse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Is the hit streak gonna live or die? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Its funny how on your previous post you said that it is more important for some people on here to be correct than for the sox to win. Yet, you are doing the exact same thing trying to insult and challenge Fathom. Why? Well obviously you can't figure it out so let me explain it to you. The last thing I'm trying to do is insult fathom, so before you open your yap next time, please know what you're talking about ok? Next, I am calling him out for his flip flopping. He posts so much and criticizes so much that he ends up contradicting himself. He criticizes Guillen for taking Cotts out vs. right handed hitters and then he criticizes Guillen for leaving Cotts in vs. righthanded hitters ... depending on the results. I trust I've explained it well enough so even you can understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:16 PM) Since when was replying to something incredibly stupid someone said the equivelant of an obsession? "Heat of the moment" doesn't quite work out well as an excuse on the Internet, either, unless you're a chimpanzee banging on keys. You've got a moment to think about what you're going to type, time to type it, and then the "submit" button to click. It's not like you were sitting around a coffee table and suddenly said, "SHOOT, I HATE THIS!" I'm so not obsessed with you that I'm going to put you on ignore now. Farewell! Whatever. Go calculate your 2.0 GPA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:03 PM) Wow. Sean was our most impressive pitcher tonight. Until Sean remembered he's a White Sox pitching prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Oh come on Hawk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 This game is no way to treat small children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxHawk1980 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Yeah, sometimes certain things seem to occur on Soxtalk. That's inevitable with several hundred consistent posters. I could say it "seems" certain posters can't handle criticism of their ballclub. I did mock him. I won't deny it. He could have made his point without sounding like a whining child. Telling us how the website is going in a wrong direction, and he's not going to be a part of it -- like a message board can honestly affect someones like to that extent. I'm sorry if I don't feel sympathy. As I said, intelligent fans can handle hearing criticism about their team and don't close their eyes to reality. I'm sure there are lots of cheerleading threads for you to post in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Well, that caps the night off perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Charge the mound! Were's the fire?? Eff this Ranger team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Thank you Texas!!! That might be the spark we need. Ozzie is going to flip about this. Why can't Ozzie charge Buck in the dugout? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JimH Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 You're right that I say Cotts should be allowed to start an inning once in a while. He's good enough where he should be allowed the right to get 3 outs on his own in an inning. Against a tough righty though who has seen Cotts before and done well vs him, I don't think he should still be in. We have 3 very good non-closer relievers in Cotts, McCarthy, and Thornton. All 3 of them should be allowed to be more than just one batter relievers. Fathom ... this is your usual tap dance. You know, and I know, you have criticized Guillen for taking Cotts out vs. righthanded hitting. And now you criticize him for leaving him in. You can't have it both ways. That's all I'm saying. I have been around here long enough and have read your criticisms long enough to know what you have said and haven't said. I have made my point on this and I will leave it alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 QUOTE(fathom @ Jul 21, 2006 -> 10:19 PM) Thank you Texas!!! That might be the spark we need. Ozzie is going to flip about this. Why can't Ozzie charge Buck in the dugout? Lol I feel sorry for Tracey... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Talk about the ultimate retaliation. You can't possibly believe it was accident, 1-2, 2 outs, up 7 runs. This is just embarrassing. Like kicking us while we're down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts