Heads22 Posted July 23, 2006 Share Posted July 23, 2006 Greasy wanted me to start a new Tiger Watch. Enjoy. Maybe it'll bring a hex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 changed the name a bit so people don't think it's a dos and don'ts thread... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phuck the Cubs Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 LOSE, TIGERS, LOSE!!! GOD DAM IT!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldmember Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Cuck the Fubs @ Jul 23, 2006 -> 11:24 PM) LOSE, TIGERS, LOSE!!! GOD DAM IT!! they do lose, it just so happens that we lose at the same time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 My goodness, did anyone just see that ridiculous bit on sportscenter? Why both Tiger Woods and the Tigers are so great. Wow. What a gigantic fluff piece. We never got sh*t like that last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonderman38 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 It's only because of the surprise. The Sox were a bit of a surprise last year, but not this big of one. But, I agree. There is absolutely no point in comparing the Tigers to Tiger Woods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan76 Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Bonderman38 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 01:18 AM) It's only because of the surprise. The Sox were a bit of a surprise last year, but not this big of one. But, I agree. There is absolutely no point in comparing the Tigers to Tiger Woods. The Sox were picked to finish 4th by many "experts". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spawn Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 I'm thinking we need to worry more about the Sox winning than the Tigers losing. Just my .02. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loltrain Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 The Sox get just as much positive coverage as the Tigers. Up until a week ago nearly everyone on ESPN predicted Chicago would win the world series, and talked about how great your pitching was... As for fluff pieces, how about that commercial for the ESPYs? "and everyone got behind us...." Of course, both of our teams coverage pales in comparison to what the Bostons and New Yorks of the world get, but that's to be expected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 23, 2006 -> 09:42 PM) My goodness, did anyone just see that ridiculous bit on sportscenter? Why both Tiger Woods and the Tigers are so great. Wow. What a gigantic fluff piece. We never got sh*t like that last year. I blame Magnum PI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTalkThai Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 QUOTE(spawn @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 01:44 PM) I'm thinking we need to worry more about the Sox winning than the Tigers losing. Just my .02. I'm thinking that the reality of the situation isn't going to be affected at all, in either direction regardless of what folks in here worry about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34FG56MB52JC Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Tigers beating Indians 5-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerfan Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Not nomore. 9-7 Tigers in the bottom of the 8th. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loltrain Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Well, this was one of the most boring games I've ever seen, I swear every Indians pitcher took about 5 minutes for each pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonderman38 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 QUOTE(SoxFan76 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 10:44 AM) The Sox were picked to finish 4th by many "experts". The Sox didn't average 100 losses in the last five years and they didn't lose 119 games in 2003 though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerfan Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Just read a very interesting stat. With our 5 run 1st tonight against the Tribe, the Tigers became the first team since 1891 to score 5 or more runs in the 1st inning in 3 consecutive games. The Cleveland Browns of that year had been the last to do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan76 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 QUOTE(Bonderman38 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 10:34 PM) The Sox didn't average 100 losses in the last five years and they didn't lose 119 games in 2003 though. Nope, they didn't. You got me there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 QUOTE(Bonderman38 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 10:34 PM) The Sox didn't average 100 losses in the last five years and they didn't lose 119 games in 2003 though. They were equally surprising. Both were teams that hadn't done spiff in a decade. The Tigers sucked the past 10 years or so, while the Sox were mediocre. You generally never strive to suck or strive for mediocrity(unless you're the Cubs), so there is no pride really in either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 QUOTE(Bonderman38 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 08:34 PM) The Sox didn't average 100 losses in the last five years and they didn't lose 119 games in 2003 though. And therefore, we didn't get to draft anyone nearly as sure as a Justin Verlander. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan76 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 25, 2006 -> 01:40 PM) And therefore, we didn't get to draft anyone nearly as sure as a Justin Verlander. I've always said I'd rather be spiffty than mediocre. At least you get the draft picks. Less heart break too, you can just say we suck instead of being so close, yet so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonderman38 Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jul 25, 2006 -> 02:40 PM) And therefore, we didn't get to draft anyone nearly as sure as a Justin Verlander. Good point. I didn't even think about it from that perspective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDsDirtySox Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 Tuesday... July 25... Bottom of the 1st... Tribe 5... Tigers 0... still no outs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loltrain Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 8-7 now, Brandon Inge is the hottest hitter in MLB right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackTalkThai Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(loltrain @ Jul 25, 2006 -> 08:36 PM) 8-7 now, Brandon Inge is the hottest hitter in MLB right now. 20 HR's and 60 RBI from your #9 hitter is pretty damn impressive production. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loltrain Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Looks like the Indians will win this one, Craig Monroe decides that playing defense isn't his style leading to an inside the park homer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.