Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Wedge @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:02 AM) I guess I don't get it. Aren't the A's in contention? Why are they trading their Ace? He's not going to resign there in the offseason, and Billy Beane is the sort of guy that would deal him for the right prospects (Milledge and McCarthy are high up on his list afaik) so they get something better than 2 draft picks which they would receive as compensation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 02:01 PM) FWIW, to get a Zito, we would realistically have to include Brandon McCarthy and that ain't happenin. The right strategy IMHO should be to trade a starter in Garcia or Vazquez to open up a spot for B-Mac, not trade for another starter. Doesn't make sense for a 2 month rental, considering the players you would have to give up. It makes sense that another team would want and overpay to get Zito. The Sox don't really need to, despite the SP's struggles. Now if Zito was under contract for another yr or two, yes KW would probably pull a deal. But he's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Wedge @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:02 AM) I guess I don't get it. Aren't the A's in contention? Why are they trading their Ace? Typical Beane move, e.g the Hudson and Mulder deals. He knows that Zito won't be coming back, and if he can get a young stud SP prospect, or even a position player e.g like Dan Meyer and Dan Haren, he'll probably make the deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:05 AM) I would love this deal, provided we don't lose BMAC. Give Oakland Sweeney or Fields or someone in the minors that they may want. Some prospects. Give the Mets Freddy or Vazquez. Take Zito, and when he's gone in the offseason, plug McCarthy into his spot. That's what I'd like, anyway. At least now we have an idea what Kenny's "bigger than that" comment meant. I would hate to see Sweeney elsewhere, especially when we'd only be getting a 2 month rental. That would be a huge ripoff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Felix @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 08:06 AM) He's not going to resign there in the offseason, and Billy Beane is the sort of guy that would deal him for the right prospects (Milledge and McCarthy are high up on his list afaik) so they get something better than 2 draft picks which they would receive as compensation. so he's bizzaro Kenny? He thinks the 2008 World Series can be won in 2006? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:06 AM) or even a position player e.g like Dan Meyer and Dan Haren Both Meyer and Haren are pitchers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 The MEts wouldn't help us get Zito. He's the SP they'd want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(beck72 @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:06 AM) It makes sense that another team would want and overpay to get Zito. The Sox don't really need to, despite the SP's struggles. Now if Zito was under contract for another yr or two, yes KW would probably pull a deal. But he's not. That's why he got a guy in MacDougall who we'll control until 2009 IIRC. Getting Zito doesn't make any sense to me, when I personally think there's better moves to make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Wedge @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:07 AM) so he's bizzaro Kenny? He thinks the 2008 World Series can be won in 2006? No, but he doesn't have the money at his disposal to make moves to win it this year, so he'll trade off players that won't resign to put himself in a better position for the future with young studs. I mean, seriously, which would you rather? 2 months of Zito or 6 years of someone like Milledge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Felix @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:07 AM) Both Meyer and Haren are pitchers Yeah I know, switch the position player and SP spect in that sentence, but u get my drift. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(beck72 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:07 AM) The MEts wouldn't help us get Zito. He's the SP they'd want Suppose someone like Vazquez or Freddy was sent to the Mets. Vazquez has connections with Minaya through Montreal, and both pitchers are hispanic, something that is apparently important to the Mets. If that were the case, they might be willing to, although I wouldn't bet on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 02:08 PM) That's why he got a guy in MacDougall who we'll control until 2009 IIRC. Getting Zito doesn't make any sense to me, when I personally think there's better moves to make. That's why, if this story is correct, I think the Sox could be the 3rd team, not getting Zito, but other useful players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(beck72 @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:10 AM) That's why, if this story is correct, I think the Sox could be the 3rd team, not getting Zito, but other useful players Yeah for example if you traded prospects to acquire Zito right, then you traded him to a team that desperately needed him like say for instance the Dodgers, who could give up a package including say a Jonathan Broxton, a young stud reliever who can help you now and in the future. That's the only way I could see us being invovled in a 3 way deal revolving around Barry Zito. EDIT: How does a Zito and Uribe for Broxton, Furcal and maybe a spect deal sound? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 08:55 AM) Zito will help us now. FWIW, Boras was at 2 Boston/White Sox games. 1 in Unc's box. Perhaps they've mended the fence. Well that certianly makes things interesting. Could we be talking about a signing along with a trade then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:13 AM) Well that certianly makes things interesting. Could we be talking about a signing along with a trade then? If you could get Zito locked up, then hell yeah do the deal. But looking at Bora$$'$ history, how many of clients has he allowed to re-sign with their current team when they are about to hit FA that off-season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:11 AM) EDIT: How does a Zito and Uribe for Broxton, Furcal and maybe a spect deal sound? Fish no (and yes, I typed fish). Furcal is not that good a baseball player, and is hardly worth the 13 million he'll be making both next year and 2008. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Felix @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:18 AM) Fish no (and yes, I typed fish). Furcal is not that good a baseball player, and is hardly worth the 13 million he'll be making both next year and 2008. I suggested that because maybe you could get the Dodgers pay a bit of his deal, like they did with Odalis Perez. And with Podsednik probably leaving next season (even though he is arbitration eligible IIRC), we'll need a leadoff hitter to replace him. Upgrading from Uribe, seems like the best choice for me, if you can't get a guy like Carl Crawford. Plus if you trade Garcia, you save the $10M you'll have to pay him next season as well. You might as well put that money towards something right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 09:11 AM) Yeah for example if you traded prospects to acquire Zito right, then you traded him to a team that desperately needed him like say for instance the Dodgers, who could give up a package including say a Jonathan Broxton, a young stud reliever who can help you now and in the future. That's the only way I could see us being invovled in a 3 way deal revolving around Barry Zito. EDIT: How does a Zito and Uribe for Broxton, Furcal and maybe a spect deal sound? Why on earth would we want to deal Uribe for Furcal? A player who makes $13 million to steal bases? Juan just about matches him defensively and hits for more power. I want no part of a declining Rafael Furcal. I don't understand why a reliever is even necessary at this point. As for the Zito speculation, I cannot fathom a scenario wherein the third team involved would be the Mets. Minyana would get CRUCIFIED if he was involved in a deal involving Zito and allowed him to go to Chicago. And I cannot see Kenny being involved in ANY deal where he isn't getting the highest impact player. The Mets and White Sox both have GM's who go after impact players and there just aren't enough impact players for the A's to give up to two teams. If this is true, I imagine it would be a deal where the White Sox get Zito, another team gets Garcia, and we swing Broadway along with the prospects from the other team to the A's for Zito. That third team would HAVE to be a national league team, because there isn't another AL team that would help us acquire Zito AND take on a high-salaried player. I dunno...this sounds pretty difficult to imagine being true... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Steff @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 08:55 AM) Zito will help us now. FWIW, Boras was at 2 Boston/White Sox games. 1 in Unc's box. Perhaps they've mended the fence. I don't think Boras is ever going to change the way he does business, so I see no way that fence will ever be mended. They may have been discussing a contract for Crede. Either that, or maybe JR wasn't at the game Boras was in his box. Edited July 26, 2006 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 09:14 AM) If you could get Zito locked up, then hell yeah do the deal. But looking at Bora$$'$ history, how many of clients has he allowed to re-sign with their current team when they are about to hit FA that off-season? Boras was just quoted as saying he doesn't believe there is enough time to be able to structure and agree to an extension before the deadline. "These things take too much time." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Jul 27, 2006 -> 12:22 AM) I don't think Boras is ever going to change the way he does business, so I see no way that fence will ever be mended. They may have been discussing a contract for Crede. Either that, or maybe JR wasn't at the game Boras was in his box. Even better news if the they can get Joe locked up to a long - term deal for a few years. Has certainly earned that with his play this season thus far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(iamshack @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 09:24 AM) Boras was just quoted as saying he doesn't believe there is enough time to be able to structure and agree to an extension before the deadline. "These things take too much time." Exactly. I see no way Zito signs a contract quickly with Boras running the show. He's has to be as near of lock as can be to be a free agent unless the Mets trade for him and give him an ungodly contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 10:21 AM) I suggested that because maybe you could get the Dodgers pay a bit of his deal, like they did with Odalis Perez. And with Podsednik probably leaving next season (even though he is arbitration eligible IIRC), we'll need a leadoff hitter to replace him. Upgrading from Uribe, seems like the best choice for me, if you can't get a guy like Carl Crawford. Plus if you trade Garcia, you save the $10M you'll have to pay him next season as well. You might as well put that money towards something right? I don't consider Furcal much of an upgrade over Uribe, especially when you look at their salaries. That's just me though, I know that Soxtalk was all over the Furcal bandwagon during the last offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Ok, has anyone else actually heard this report, or is this someone playing a little prank to give us something to talk about in the wake of the Soriano (non) deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beck72 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 QUOTE(iamshack @ Jul 26, 2006 -> 02:21 PM) As for the Zito speculation, I cannot fathom a scenario wherein the third team involved would be the Mets. Minyana would get CRUCIFIED if he was involved in a deal involving Zito and allowed him to go to Chicago. And I cannot see Kenny being involved in ANY deal where he isn't getting the highest impact player. The Mets and White Sox both have GM's who go after impact players and there just aren't enough impact players for the A's to give up to two teams. If this is true, I imagine it would be a deal where the White Sox get Zito, another team gets Garcia, and we swing Broadway along with the prospects from the other team to the A's for Zito. That third team would HAVE to be a national league team, because there isn't another AL team that would help us acquire Zito AND take on a high-salaried player. I dunno...this sounds pretty difficult to imagine being true... The only teams that could or might be interested in Zito would be STL, Ariz, SD. The dodgers maybe, but they need other help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.