korntownballa Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 would it be kinda like the grady sizemore deal where we can lock him up for 6 more years at 30 million dollars b/c hes not a FA yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLAK Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 The poison in this deal is Crede's back. I don't think it would be prudent to go 5-6 years guaranteed with a guy at that position who has bad discs, and I doubt the White Sox will. But somebody else might run the risk. Joe has done a wonderful job of diffusing the White Sox V Boras bad history issue and keeping things professional, but when it comes down to nuts and bolts, I predict length of contract will cause Joe to go FA and move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(korntownballa @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 06:07 AM) would it be kinda like the grady sizemore deal where we can lock him up for 6 more years at 30 million dollars b/c hes not a FA yet? Unless he fires Boras, no. That would be much lower than what Boras would aim for. That being said, I do remember Crede saying something awhile ago about how its his contract, and that he isn't a tool who just listens to Boras for everything (not those words of course). I still find it unlikely that $30m/6 would happen. Edited July 30, 2006 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosox41 Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(korntownballa @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 05:07 AM) would it be kinda like the grady sizemore deal where we can lock him up for 6 more years at 30 million dollars b/c hes not a FA yet? I doubt it. Crede can probably go to arbitration next year and get $5-6 mill IMHO. No way Boras lets him sign a deal for that long when he's 2 years awar from free agency. If Boras and Crede did jump at that deal it would tell me that something was wrong with his back. If Crede's 2007 is like his 2006 then he get probably get $7-8 mill in '08. After that he's a free agent and teams would probably sign him to a shorter term deal worth more per year. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 To answer your question, the most the Sox HAVE to pay Crede next year is $0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DABearSoX Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(Felix @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 12:55 PM) Unless he fires Boras, no. That would be much lower than what Boras would aim for. That being said, I do remember Crede saying something awhile ago about how its his contract, and that he isn't a tool who just listens to Boras for everything (not those words of course). I still find it unlikely that $30m/6 would happen. Even with Boras as his agent I believe Crede will sign if he is given a respectable offer. Sorta follow in Paulie's footsteps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 I just want to know from Kenny W that he is making every effort to keep Joe Crede with the Sox. If we are fair and Booooras is fair we can keep Joe for 4 or 5 more years. He is worth it and we need him. Josh Fields can play LF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(elrockinMT @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 11:57 AM) I just want to know from Kenny W that he is making every effort to keep Joe Crede with the Sox. If we are fair and Booooras is fair we can keep Joe for 4 or 5 more years. He is worth it and we need him. Josh Fields can play LF. Why are we worried about this now? It's not exactly a pressing matter, time wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(DABearSoX @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 11:49 AM) Even with Boras as his agent I believe Crede will sign if he is given a respectable offer. Sorta follow in Paulie's footsteps. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only team to outbid the Sox for PK was the Orioles, and they only gave $1 million a year more. Konerko really didn't take a home town discount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(elrockinMT @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 12:57 PM) I just want to know from Kenny W that he is making every effort to keep Joe Crede with the Sox. If we are fair and Booooras is fair we can keep Joe for 4 or 5 more years. He is worth it and we need him. Josh Fields can play LF. Yea, its not like we have the rights to Joe Crede through 2008 or anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 12:14 PM) Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only team to outbid the Sox for PK was the Orioles, and they only gave $1 million a year more. Konerko really didn't take a home town discount. I was thinking the Angels offerd PK a 5yr/65M contract and the Orioles offered even more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(YASNY @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 12:50 PM) I was thinking the Angels offerd PK a 5yr/65M contract and the Orioles offered even more. Aren't we giving him 5/65, the same as the Angels offered? And the Orioles, I believe, offered him 5/70. A home town discount that is not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 01:08 PM) Aren't we giving him 5/65, the same as the Angels offered? And the Orioles, I believe, offered him 5/70. A home town discount that is not. I thought we signed Paulie for 5/60. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(YASNY @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 01:11 PM) I thought we signed Paulie for 5/60. We did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 01:11 PM) We did. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 01:11 PM) We did. I thought the Angels offered exactly the same as us, and the Orioles slightly more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 01:13 PM) I thought the Angels offered exactly the same as us, and the Orioles slightly more? The way I remember it, the Angels offered 5/65 but PK signed with Sox after we picked up Thome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(YASNY @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 02:14 PM) The way I remember it, the Angels offered 5/65 but PK signed with Sox after we picked up Thome. I thought it was Baltimore who offered 65, and the Angels were around 60-62. Could be wrong though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 QUOTE(YASNY @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 01:14 PM) The way I remember it, the Angels offered 5/65 but PK signed with Sox after we picked up Thome. Ya, I'm pretty sure the Angels did offer 5/65 though I'm not 100 percent positive. I am 100 percent though that we signed Paul for 5/60. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Felix @ Jul 30, 2006 -> 02:15 PM) I thought it was Baltimore who offered 65, and the Angels were around 60-62. Could be wrong though. Konerko also was courted by the Angels, who offered just over $60 million for five years, and the Baltimore Orioles, who proposed a $65 million, five-year deal. Several other teams also made inquiries. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2242424 Edited July 30, 2006 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDylan Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 The most? I don't know. 120 billion dollars? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.