EvilMonkey Posted September 15, 2006 Share Posted September 15, 2006 http://www.observer.com/20060918/20060918_...fftherecord.asp Sounds to me like teaching them to obstruct justice by destroying and/or conceling evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 The Soviet Union never had this problem. The government would just tell everyone the stories and then TAAS would report the news. No free press was needed, the government voluntarily disclosed that stuff. Too bad we couldn't be more like that. Newspapers wouldn't need confidential sources when the government starts telling us what the news really is. Once the government eliminates judges and newspapers that hinder their abilities to rule absolutely, we'll be so much happier. It worked so well in other countries. Sounds to me like they are trying to protect their sources. Sounds to me that if a whistleblower wants to come forward the newspaper will go to the wall to protect them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts