Jump to content

Tigers V. Sox


MHizzle85

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 453
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Chisoxrd5 @ Sep 18, 2006 -> 08:51 PM)
Nah..I'm not going to agree with that. I just think the wheel fell off the magical wagon, players got injured and tired, and we're done. Theres nothing more to it.

Talk about ridiculous theories LOL! :D

 

Carl said the most talented team doesn't necessarily win it all. He was right.

 

He predicted the Sox would not repeat. He was right.

 

He predicted the Sox would finish third. Right again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(South Side Fireworks Man @ Sep 18, 2006 -> 08:56 PM)
Talk about ridiculous theories LOL! :D

 

Carl said the most talented team doesn't necessarily win it all. He was right.

 

He predicted the Sox would not repeat. He was right.

 

He predicted the Sox would finish third. Right again.

 

 

Carl also expected to finish the season on a major league roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(South Side Fireworks Man @ Sep 18, 2006 -> 08:56 PM)
Talk about ridiculous theories LOL! :D

 

Carl said the most talented team doesn't necessarily win it all. He was right.

 

He predicted the Sox would not repeat. He was right.

 

He predicted the Sox would finish third. Right again.

 

Thanks Jurassic..Have the St. Paul Saints called yet?

Edited by Chisoxrd5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(The Ginger Kid @ Sep 18, 2006 -> 08:58 PM)
i'll bet tiger fans are feeling good about Rogers performance tonight. What a joke. He walks that many against KC and he's going to get hammered. Right now he's up against one of the worst teams in the league.

 

 

If it is any consolation, the Tigers will only play three more games than us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Sep 18, 2006 -> 08:59 PM)
Everett is crazy...but he was dead on regarding the Sox. Chemistry is such a stupid intangible in sports, as good teams are always said to have good chemistry, and bad teams are always said to have bad chemistry.

 

So in fewer words: "Fung is winning and winning is fung?"

 

Didn't Socartes or Descartes say that somewhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...