Steff Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 Me.. I would not have my child in a pose like this. And what's with the tat..? This child is 5 years old. (Picture removed of Cindy Crawford's five year old daughter posing semi-nude to model a swimsuit with a fake tattoo on the small of her back.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen Prawn Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 It was discussed on another board I frequent and I think Cindy Crawford (that's one of her kids) needs to be investigaged (or at least have her head examined) that she allowed such a picture to be taken. There is another one that I find to be equally questionable that I saw posted elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 That is not right. I'm a little disturbed that it is even on my screen. Creepy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 I would bet, I would hope, that the tat is not real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 The short answer is: away. Not because anything talked about on this thread was a problem, but because a few moderators - including myself - felt that the picture is inappropriate for this website. In my opinion, that shot is child exploitation when its published and toes the line on legality. Feel free to continue talking about the picture, but don't post it. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted September 21, 2006 Author Share Posted September 21, 2006 QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Sep 21, 2006 -> 10:16 AM) The short answer is: away. Not because anything talked about on this thread was a problem, but because a few moderators - including myself - felt that the picture is inappropriate for this website. In my opinion, that shot is child exploitation when its published and toes the line on legality. Feel free to continue talking about the picture, but don't post it. Thanks. Why not just remove the picture, post an edit, and leave the thread alone? Not that it matters. Can't really discuss a picture when it can't be viewed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted September 21, 2006 Share Posted September 21, 2006 You're probably right I could do that. This is what happens when you moderate fresh out of bed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted September 22, 2006 Share Posted September 22, 2006 I guess when you live in that world, having your daughter pose is probably something Cindy didn't give a second thought to. And it shouldn't have needed a second thought, the first thought should have been no way will my daughter pose like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.