VETERANS DAY.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by Spiff

A threat to us, or their own people. Jesus Christ, look at what Saddam has done to his people, testing chemical weapons on them etc. 100% voter turnout and they all vote for him? Does that sound like a society that should be left alone? He f***s around with the U.N., he says he'll let weapon inspectors in then he says no. It's not like Bush is alone in this. He is waiting to see if a deal is reached and carried out with Hussein and the UN, but he's said that he won't sit back and let him stockpile weapons to use against us or anyone else. And people come back with this "OH he only wants to make sure he gets oil". To that I say shut the f*** up.

 

THIS f***TARD HAS BEEN STRINGING ALONG THE UN FOR YEARS. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ALREADY. ITS TIME TO HOLD THIS TINPOT ASSHOLE ACCOUNTABLE & IF HE DOESN'T WANT TO COMPLY WITH THE U.N. AND DISARM HIMSELF THEN HE NEEDS TO GO. IF NOBODY ELSE BESIDES THE U.S. AND BRITAIN HAVE THE BALLS TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM THEN FINE, WE'LL GO DEAL WITH IT.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

O M F G........ i cant believe that you people have turned something as sacred as veterans day into a stupid political arguement..............LET ME PUT IT TO YOU ALL THIS WAY.... HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THOSE MEN AND WOMEN WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE AND DIED IN THE NAME OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY..... YOU ALL WOULD BE BOWING DOWN TO SOME HOLY GOAT OR SOMETHING BECAUSE SOME PATHETIC THRID WORLD COUNTRY WOULD HAVE CAME IN HERE WHILE YOU ALL WERE SINGING KUMBYA AROUND A CAMP FIRE....AND YOU ALL WOULD NOW BE SPEAKING SWAHALI OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.............WAR HAS TO HAPPEN .. ITS GODS WAY OF CLEANING OUT THE POPULATION AND RECYCLING THE BALLANCE OF NATURE.............BE THANKFUL YOUR FOREFATHERS WERE WISE ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT AND DID WHAT THEY HAD TO DO TO KEEP US FREE............................thats all i have to say on the subject so dont come back at me with some lame excuse on how war isnt right.... save it for someone who actually believes that and gives two s***s.... in the end you can thank people like me and nuke and baggs who did our duty to keep you all in a free speaking, thinking country...............

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

O M F G........  i cant believe that you  people have turned something as sacred as veterans day into a stupid political arguement..............LET ME PUT IT TO YOU ALL THIS WAY.... HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THOSE MEN AND WOMEN WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE AND DIED IN THE NAME OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY..... YOU ALL WOULD BE BOWING DOWN TO SOME HOLY GOAT OR SOMETHING BECAUSE SOME PATHETIC THRID WORLD COUNTRY WOULD HAVE CAME IN HERE WHILE YOU ALL WERE SINGING KUMBYA AROUND A CAMP FIRE....AND YOU ALL WOULD NOW BE SPEAKING SWAHALI OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.............WAR HAS TO HAPPEN .. ITS GODS WAY OF CLEANING OUT THE POPULATION AND RECYCLING THE BALLANCE OF NATURE.............BE THANKFUL YOUR FOREFATHERS WERE WISE ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT AND DID WHAT THEY HAD TO DO TO KEEP US FREE............................thats all i have to say on the subject so dont come back at me with some lame excuse on how war isnt right.... save it for someone who actually believes that and gives two s***s.... in the end you can thank people like me and nuke and baggs who did our duty to keep you all in a free speaking, thinking country...............

 

AMEN!

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

O M F G........  i cant believe that you  people have turned something as sacred as veterans day into a stupid political arguement..............LET ME PUT IT TO YOU ALL THIS WAY.... HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THOSE MEN AND WOMEN WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE AND DIED IN THE NAME OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY..... YOU ALL WOULD BE BOWING DOWN TO SOME HOLY GOAT OR SOMETHING BECAUSE SOME PATHETIC THRID WORLD COUNTRY WOULD HAVE CAME IN HERE WHILE YOU ALL WERE SINGING KUMBYA AROUND A CAMP FIRE....AND YOU ALL WOULD NOW BE SPEAKING SWAHALI OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.............WAR HAS TO HAPPEN .. ITS GODS WAY OF CLEANING OUT THE POPULATION AND RECYCLING THE BALLANCE OF NATURE.............BE THANKFUL YOUR FOREFATHERS WERE WISE ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT AND DID WHAT THEY HAD TO DO TO KEEP US FREE............................thats all i have to say on the subject so dont come back at me with some lame excuse on how war isnt right.... save it for someone who actually believes that and gives two s***s.... in the end you can thank people like me and nuke and baggs who did our duty to keep you all in a free speaking, thinking country...............

 

You do know that November 11 was originally known as Armistice Day, a day promoting peace after World War 1, right?

 

Gandhi defeated the entire British army without using a single weapon and liberated all of India without firing a single gun. He knew that violence only breeds more violence.

 

If we are going to get on the case that Saddam needs to be ousted because he is killing his own people then I have a few questions.

 

Why don't we out the militaristic dictators in Colombia who are slaughtering peasant farm workers and church workers

and labor unionizers?

 

Why didn't we oust Augusto Pinochet in Chile when we knew that he was slaughtering thousands of people (including US citizens living in Chile)?

 

Or Pol Pot in Cambodia?

 

Or oust Roberto D'Aubuisson for being one of the orchestrators of an infamous citizen Central American death squad Batallion 3:16?

 

Or oust the leaders that authorized the El Mazote massacre of 900 civilians (over 1/2 under the age of 12) in El Salvador?

 

Or how about ousting Ariel Sharon for his actions in Sabra and Shatila in the 1980s?

 

Why is the US so picky about which dictators it doesn't like?

 

I mean, we obviously helped the Contras during the Reagan years and the Moujhadeen as well, so we must like some terrorists.

 

Or how about killing the Israeli intelligence agency for allowing "Operation Wrath of God"?

 

WHY IS THE US SO GODDAMN PICKY ABOUT WHAT IS TERRORISM AND WHAT ISN'T?

 

and somebody explain to me how us bombing Iraqi & Afghan civilians can NOT be terrorism. we are using "weapons of mass destruction" to kill innocent people. Sounds like terrorism to me.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

may as well get them before they get us... if it were up to me apu i would blast the s*** out of anyone who didnt think like us.. let the terrorists get a taste of their own medicine for a change.... sound familiar????? like i said before its time to ballance out nature again.. may as well be them instead of me.......thats how i see it anyhow........

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

may as well get them before they get us... if it were up to me apu i would blast the s*** out of anyone who didnt think like us.. let the terrorists get a taste of their own medicine for a change.... sound familiar????? like i said before its time to ballance out nature again.. may as well be them instead of me.......thats how i see it anyhow........

 

Yes, beat the s*** out of anyone who didn't like us...why must we be the world bully?

 

Haven't we seen where bomb dropping has gotten us so far? Just more people hating us.

 

Hell, Bush went AWOL and didn't fight and Cheney had "other obligations" instead of serving. I don't see how all you Hawks can admire him when our leader didn't even serve and ran out on his country in it's time of need.

 

Think about that.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

You do know that November 11 was originally known as Armistice Day, a day promoting peace after World War 1, right?

 

Gandhi defeated the entire British army without using a single weapon and liberated all of India without firing a single gun.  He knew that violence only breeds more violence.

 

If we are going to get on the case that Saddam needs to be ousted because he is killing his own people then I have a few questions.

 

Why don't we out the militaristic dictators in Colombia who are slaughtering peasant farm workers and church workers

and labor unionizers?

 

Why didn't we oust Augusto Pinochet in Chile when we knew that he was slaughtering thousands of people (including US citizens living in Chile)?

 

Or Pol Pot in Cambodia?

 

Or oust Roberto D'Aubuisson for being one of the orchestrators of an infamous citizen Central American death squad Batallion 3:16?

 

Or oust the leaders that authorized the El Mazote massacre of 900 civilians (over 1/2 under the age of 12) in El Salvador?

 

Or how about ousting Ariel Sharon for his actions in Sabra and Shatila in the 1980s?

 

Why is the US so picky about which dictators it doesn't like?

 

I mean, we obviously helped the Contras during the Reagan years and the Moujhadeen as well, so we must like some terrorists.

 

Or how about killing the Israeli intelligence agency for allowing "Operation Wrath of God"?

 

WHY IS THE US SO GODDAMN PICKY ABOUT WHAT IS TERRORISM AND WHAT ISN'T?

 

and somebody explain to me how us bombing Iraqi & Afghan civilians can NOT be terrorism.  we are using "weapons of mass destruction" to kill innocent people.  Sounds like terrorism to me.

 

DUMB f***, WE DONT BOMB CIVILLIANS, AT LEAST NOT ON PURPOSE. AND FUNNY, NONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES YOU MENTIONED (EXCEPT FOR AFGHANISTAN & IRAQ EVER POSED A THREAT TO THE US DID THEY? WE GO TAKE DOWN WHO THREATENS US AND OUR INTERESTS. YOU KNOW THIS, BUT YOU KEEP POSTING MINDLESS GARBAGE LIKE YOUR LAST POST. WHAT THE f*** EVER.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

You do know that November 11 was originally known as Armistice Day, a day promoting peace after World War 1, right?

 

Gandhi defeated the entire British army without using a single weapon and liberated all of India without firing a single gun.  He knew that violence only breeds more violence.

 

If we are going to get on the case that Saddam needs to be ousted because he is killing his own people then I have a few questions.

 

Why don't we out the militaristic dictators in Colombia who are slaughtering peasant farm workers and church workers

and labor unionizers?

 

Why didn't we oust Augusto Pinochet in Chile when we knew that he was slaughtering thousands of people (including US citizens living in Chile)?

 

Or Pol Pot in Cambodia?

 

Or oust Roberto D'Aubuisson for being one of the orchestrators of an infamous citizen Central American death squad Batallion 3:16?

 

Or oust the leaders that authorized the El Mazote massacre of 900 civilians (over 1/2 under the age of 12) in El Salvador?

 

Or how about ousting Ariel Sharon for his actions in Sabra and Shatila in the 1980s?

 

Why is the US so picky about which dictators it doesn't like?

 

I mean, we obviously helped the Contras during the Reagan years and the Moujhadeen as well, so we must like some terrorists.

 

Or how about killing the Israeli intelligence agency for allowing "Operation Wrath of God"?

 

WHY IS THE US SO GODDAMN PICKY ABOUT WHAT IS TERRORISM AND WHAT ISN'T?

 

and somebody explain to me how us bombing Iraqi & Afghan civilians can NOT be terrorism.  we are using "weapons of mass destruction" to kill innocent people.  Sounds like terrorism to me.

 

DUMB f***, WE DONT BOMB CIVILLIANS, AT LEAST NOT ON PURPOSE. AND FUNNY, NONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES YOU MENTIONED (EXCEPT FOR AFGHANISTAN & IRAQ EVER POSED A THREAT TO THE US DID THEY? WE GO TAKE DOWN WHO THREATENS US AND OUR INTERESTS. YOU KNOW THIS, BUT YOU KEEP POSTING MINDLESS GARBAGE LIKE YOUR LAST POST. WHAT THE f*** EVER.

 

IF WE'RE FIGHTING A WAR ON TERROR THEN WHY NOT FIGHT TERROR IN ALL FORMS?

 

OR IS IT JUST THE TERROR THAT INTERFERES WITH US BUSINESS INTERESTS?

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

apu you go on an rant and rave all you want to .. they did the first strike on us this time and they can not go unpunished....any of them.. they are building a stockpile of nerve gas and other chemical weapons which im sure they intend on dropping on us with the next pass of terror.... so why not get them before they have a chance to????? or you going to wait till the next bomb hits you on your head before you think we need to do something about it...........

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

IF WE'RE FIGHTING A WAR ON TERROR THEN WHY NOT FIGHT TERROR IN ALL FORMS?   

 

OR IS IT JUST THE TERROR THAT INTERFERES WITH US BUSINESS INTERESTS?

 

I SUPPOSE THAT DEPOSING THE TALIBAN WAS TO EARN ENRON A FEW MORE BUCKS. YEAH I THOUGHT THAT IT HAD TO DO WITH BUILDINGS GETTING BLOWN UP & PEOPLE DYING, BUT I HAD SIDESHOW TO STRAIGHTEN ME OUT ON THAT ONE. I'M ALL GOOD NOW.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

IF WE'RE FIGHTING A WAR ON TERROR THEN WHY NOT FIGHT TERROR IN ALL FORMS?   

 

OR IS IT JUST THE TERROR THAT INTERFERES WITH US BUSINESS INTERESTS?

 

I SUPPOSE THAT DEPOSING THE TALIBAN WAS TO EARN ENRON A FEW MORE BUCKS. YEAH I THOUGHT THAT IT HAD TO DO WITH BUILDINGS GETTING BLOWN UP & PEOPLE DYING, BUT I HAD SIDESHOW TO STRAIGHTEN ME OUT ON THAT ONE. I'M ALL GOOD NOW.

 

Oh yes, and we just happened to forget about the plans from 1997 that there was an oil pipeline to be build across Afghanistan that the Taliban didn't want.

...the business deals took place in Texas...and brace yourself, the lead corporation was Halliburton and Dubya was involved in courting the Taliban!

 

Sounds economic to me, asshat.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

IF WE'RE FIGHTING A WAR ON TERROR THEN WHY NOT FIGHT TERROR IN ALL FORMS?   

 

OR IS IT JUST THE TERROR THAT INTERFERES WITH US BUSINESS INTERESTS?

 

I SUPPOSE THAT DEPOSING THE TALIBAN WAS TO EARN ENRON A FEW MORE BUCKS. YEAH I THOUGHT THAT IT HAD TO DO WITH BUILDINGS GETTING BLOWN UP & PEOPLE DYING, BUT I HAD SIDESHOW TO STRAIGHTEN ME OUT ON THAT ONE. I'M ALL GOOD NOW.

 

Oh yes, and we just happened to forget about the plans from 1997 that there was an oil pipeline to be build across Afghanistan that the Taliban didn't want.

...the business deals took place in Texas...and brace yourself, the lead corporation was Halliburton and Dubya was involved in courting the Taliban!

 

Sounds economic to me, asshat.

 

SO THEY DIDNT WANT A PIPELINE? IS THAT WHY THEY KILLED ALL THOSE PEOPLE? LMFAO. YOU ARE SUCH THE TWIT.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Now that the Taliban is gone...don't you think that those people are going to be indebted to us?

 

If you don't, then you my friend are the twit.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Now that the Taliban is gone...don't you think that those people are going to be indebted to us?

 

If you don't, then you my friend are the twit.

 

I THINK THEY ARE. FUNNY HOW THESE HORRIBLE AMERICANS WHO BOMB CIVILLIANS & TRAMPLE ALL OVER THE POOR ISLAMIC PEOPLE ARE NOW OVER THERE REBUILDING THEIR COUNTRY & KEEPING THE FIRST PEACE THERE SINCE 1979. OOOOO WE'RE SOOOO TERRIBLE.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Now that the Taliban is gone...don't you think that those people are going to be indebted to us?

 

If you don't, then you my friend are the twit.

 

I THINK THEY ARE. FUNNY HOW THESE HORRIBLE AMERICANS WHO BOMB CIVILLIANS & TRAMPLE ALL OVER THE POOR ISLAMIC PEOPLE ARE NOW OVER THERE REBUILDING THEIR COUNTRY & KEEPING THE FIRST PEACE THERE SINCE 1979. OOOOO WE'RE SOOOO TERRIBLE.

 

Yes, and the Taliban is the same regime that we gave over $100 million. The same terrorist harboring nation...explain why we would support terrorism by giving the well known terrorist harboring nation money? Bush aids terrorism!

 

Bush Bush you corporate whore We don't want your oil war!

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Now that the Taliban is gone...don't you think that those people are going to be indebted to us?

 

If you don't, then you my friend are the twit.

 

I THINK THEY ARE. FUNNY HOW THESE HORRIBLE AMERICANS WHO BOMB CIVILLIANS & TRAMPLE ALL OVER THE POOR ISLAMIC PEOPLE ARE NOW OVER THERE REBUILDING THEIR COUNTRY & KEEPING THE FIRST PEACE THERE SINCE 1979. OOOOO WE'RE SOOOO TERRIBLE.

 

Yes, and the Taliban is the same regime that we gave over $100 million. The same terrorist harboring nation...explain why we would support terrorism by giving the well known terrorist harboring nation money? Bush aids terrorism!

 

Bush Bush you corporate whore We don't want your oil war!

 

SO THEY TOOK OUR MONEY & THEN DECIDED TO f*** WITH US. FINE. LET THE BOMBS START FALLING! NOBODY CROSSES US LIKE THAT AND GETS AWAY WITH IT.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

apu if you go back further you will see we aided them long before bush.... remember russia and the cold war?????? and it goes even further back from there........maybe bush has to do with oil but the later presidents it had to do with our hate twards russia

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

apu if you go back further you will see we aided them long before bush.... remember russia and the cold war?????? and it goes even further back from there........maybe bush has to do with oil but the later presidents it had to do with our hate twards russia

 

I know, we supported terrorists then. And we continue to do so now.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

apu hon.. you know i love you dearly.. dont make me get pissed enough to come out there and kick your ass ok..... lets just say thanks to the vets and leave it at that alright????? thankyou..........

[CubKilla]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

apu hon.. you know i love you dearly.. dont make me get pissed enough to come out there and kick your ass  ok..... lets just say thanks to the vets and leave it at that alright????? thankyou..........

 

They can't let it go though HSC. The War on Terrorism has everything to do with oil and nothing to do with the WTC and Pentagon tragedies. The sooner you get that through your head HSC, the better. Only problem is, you'd have to stick your head about 3 feet up into your ass to buy that argument.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

lol killa.. well i would just rather they say THANKYOU and went on their way.... isnt that how jack says it in a few good men??? they cant handle the truth so they sugar coat it ....ect. ect.. you get the point....... this isnt about f***in oil... it has to do with the fact that we were bombed and we need to retaliate in some way or the other countries like russia, japan, china are going to be watching and saying wtf those us folks are a bunch of pussies.. .lets go in there and take them over .. hell if a little asshole like bin laden can cause a little destruction why we can cause a bit more and make the americans sucumb to our ways.........aint that more like what its all about?????

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by CubKilla

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

apu hon.. you know i love you dearly.. dont make me get pissed enough to come out there and kick your ass ok..... lets just say thanks to the vets and leave it at that alright????? thankyou..........

 

They can't let it go though HSC.

 

The War on Terrorism has everything to do with oil and nothing to do with the WTC and Pentagon tragedies.

 

LOL! TALKING SENSE INTO HIM IS TOTALLY POINTLESS. HE AND HIS PALS HERE OBVIOUSLY DONT LIKE AMERICA VERY MUCH & PROBABLY WOULD CELEBRATE IF IT EVER CAME TO AN END. FORTUNATELY NEARLY ALL OF US KNOW BETTER AND SEE HIM AND HIS IDEAS FOR WHAT THEY ARE. BULLs***.

 

THATS ALL THAT NEEDS TO BE SAID.

[CubKilla]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

lol killa.. well i would just rather they say THANKYOU and went on their way.... isnt that how jack says it in a few good men??? they cant handle the truth so they sugar coat it ....ect. ect.. you get the point....... this isnt about f***in oil... it has to do with the fact that we were bombed and we need to retaliate in some way or the other countries like russia, japan, china are going to be watching and saying wtf those us folks are a bunch of pussies.. .lets go in there and take them over .. hell if a little asshole like bin laden can cause a little destruction why we can cause a bit more and make the americans sucumb to our ways.........aint that more like what its all about????? 

 

That..... and for about a decade now, Saddam has denied UN Weapons Inspectors access to Iraq. This, after Saddam used force to overtake Kuwait. This, after Saddam agreed to unrestricted access to Weapons Inspectors assigned to Iraq. This, after Saddam has shown the world he doesn't care about the effects of using chemical weapons on his own people. Saddam only knows violence. Why do you think the Iraqi Parliament (funny they have a "Parliament" when Saddam is a dictator!) voted unanimously to ignore the UN Resolution? If they voted for it, they'd be dead right now. Iraq is in defiance of the whole world. For God's sake, even France sided with the US on this Resolution. But somehow, in the eyes of Cerbaho, Apu, and doubleM, we're the bad guy here.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

well i say send them over there to live and they can look up to the nite sky and give us a live report on the conditions there when the first nukes come landing......

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

well i say send them over there to live and they can look up to the nite sky and give us a live report on the conditions there when the first nukes come landing......

 

NAH, THEY WOULDNT LIVE THAT LONG. THESE DICTATORS THAT THEY HAVE SUCH A LOVE AFFAIR WITH WOULDNT LET THESE THREE LIVE 5 MINUTES WITH ATTITUDES LIKE THAT. ONE OF THE IRONIES OF LIVING IN AMERICA IS THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT WILL TOLERATE PEOPLE LIKE THEM IS THE SAME COUNTRY THAT THEY SPIT ON EVERY CHANCE THEY GET.