VETERANS DAY.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

EVERY TIME APU, CERBAHO & DOUBLEM RUN THEIR YAPS IT MAKES BELLS RING IN MY HEAD.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by CubKilla

That..... and for about a decade now, Saddam has denied UN Weapons Inspectors access to Iraq. This, after Saddam used force to overtake Kuwait. This, after Saddam agreed to unrestricted access to Weapons Inspectors assigned to Iraq. This, after Saddam has shown the world he doesn't care about the effects of using chemical weapons on his own people. Saddam only knows violence. Why do you think the Iraqi Parliament (funny they have a "Parliament" when Saddam is a dictator!) voted unanimously to ignore the UN Resolution? If they voted for it, they'd be dead right now. Iraq is in defiance of the whole world. For God's sake, even France sided with the US on this Resolution. But somehow, in the eyes of Cerbaho, Apu, and doubleM, we're the bad guy here.

 

IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT WE DO KILLA WE ARE ALWAYS GONNA BE THE BAD GUY IN THEIR EYES. WE MAY AS WELL DO WHAT WE KNOW WE HAVE TO DO & LET THEM BUZZ AROUND & MAKE STUPID NOISES ALL THEY WANT TO.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

AKKKKKKKK............ JUST TELL ME f***ING THANKYOU FOR PROVIDING SECURITY WHILE WE ARE DOING OUR DAY TO DAY ROUTINE AND YOUR OFF FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM IN A FAR OFF PLACE..... THATS ALL I NEED TO HEAR........THATS ALL I ASK FOR MY SERVICES......AND IF YOU CANT MUSTER UP THAT MUCH THEN f*** YOU GO FIGHT FOR YOUR OWN FREEDOM........MOVE TO ANOTHER COUNTRY OR SOMETHING.. BUT DO NOT TELL ME MY EFFORTS WERE FOR NOUGHT.......................ENOUGH SAID IM DONE...............

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by CubKilla

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

apu hon.. you know i love you dearly.. dont make me get pissed enough to come out there and kick your ass ok..... lets just say thanks to the vets and leave it at that alright????? thankyou..........

 

They can't let it go though HSC. The War on Terrorism has everything to do with oil and nothing to do with the WTC and Pentagon tragedies.

 

Cub, tell me what exactly Saddam did to perpetrate the WTC and Pentagon attacks, please. The fact is that Dubya is using "The War On Terror" to do whatever the hell he wants and get away with it using the dead of 9/11 as a f***ing carpet.

 

Yes, I agree with you that Saddam is a f***. But explain to me how massive bombing strikes would kill him. It didn't work in '91, it didn't work with bin Laden, it didn't work when we tried in Libya, our bombing didn't kill Hitler....do we see a trend here?

 

Also, am I just supposed to disregard the fact that Bush and his buddies are all huge oil company friends and the influence from that is quite the influence to invade Iraq.

 

And HSC, I value the troops. I think I value them most by saying "Bring them home so they don't die and have to be remembered. I don't want them to die so Exxon and Texeco can produce cheaper oil."

 

What happened the TWAT (The War On Terror) plan to get bin Laden and Al Qaeda top officials. So far we've captured a whole 0 top officials and the ones killed can be counted on 1 hand. Might it be that Bush and Co. didn't wanna look like they had egg on their face right before midterm elections and thusly decided to do what Daddy Bush did and threaten Iraq?

 

I do agree that Saddam is a f*** and that he does need to be taken care of for what he is doing to his own citizenry, but not with a massive military attack that has not been provoked.

You can claim that he has a nuclear arsenal, but a recent CIA report claims that with a very high probability, Iraq does not have nuclear capabilities. Yes, our CIA said that.

 

Our veterans did sacrifice a lot. But a near third world country in the Middle East like Iraq poses no threat. They have no military, no nuclear arsenal...Bush just needs to swing out his militaristic wang and dicksmack somebody with it instead of dealing with our failing economy or dealing with the fact that he can't find Al Qaeda.

 

Explain to me again how massive bombing strikes are gonna get one man. I'd really like to hear the explanation for that one.

 

And Cub, if you really want the oil relationships between top Bush executives and the influence that oil companies are having on this war in Iraq, I'll gladly hook you up with some informational sources (don't worry NUKE, not leftist ones...it's a source that shows how much companies contribute to campaigns...they get this info via the Freedom of Information Act and just post it for political science research purposes...it's a very respected political science research site www.opensecrets.org)

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

HOW IN THE f*** DO YOU FIGURE THAT A MASS ATTACK ON THE WTC WAS NOT DESERVING OF A MASS ATTACK ON THE PISS ANT COUNTRY WHICH HARBORS THE ASSHOLE WHO PLOTED IT.....YOU ARE f***ED UP IN YOUR BELIEFS... GO TOTE A GUN AND STAND A f***ING POST AND THEN COME BACK AND TELL ME HOW MUCH YOU VALUE THE TROOPS...... THOSE MEN AND WOMEN ARE PROUD AND THERE TO DO THEIR DUTY FOR THEIR COUNTRY AND THOSE WHO HAVE FALLEN IN THIS BULLs*** ATTACK ON US... TELL THE FAMILIES OF THOSE WTC FOLKS THAT THEIR DEATHS DONT DESERVE SOME REVENGE..............YOUR STARTING TO REALLY PISS ME OFF APU................

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

HOW IN THE f*** DO YOU FIGURE THAT A MASS ATTACK ON THE WTC WAS NOT DESERVING OF A MASS ATTACK ON THE PISS ANT COUNTRY WHICH HARBORS THE ASSHOLE WHO PLOTED IT.....YOU ARE f***ED UP IN YOUR BELIEFS... GO TOTE A GUN AND STAND A f***ING POST AND THEN COME BACK AND TELL ME HOW MUCH YOU VALUE THE TROOPS...... THOSE MEN AND WOMEN ARE PROUD AND THERE TO DO THEIR DUTY FOR THEIR COUNTRY AND THOSE WHO HAVE FALLEN IN THIS BULLs*** ATTACK ON US... TELL THE FAMILIES OF THOSE WTC FOLKS THAT THEIR DEATHS DONT DESERVE SOME REVENGE..............YOUR STARTING TO REALLY PISS ME OFF APU................

 

Afghanistan harbored the 9/11 attackers...and if we want to get technical 15 of them were born in Saudi Arabia.

 

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. SADDAM HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11!

Do I need to scream this from the mountaintops?

[LowerCaseRepublican]

http://www.opensecrets.org/bush/cabinet.asp##1

 

Please, I ask that you take a look at these. It's a very interesting read.

[baggio202]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by CubKilla

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

apu hon.. you know i love you dearly.. dont make me get pissed enough to come out there and kick your ass ok..... lets just say thanks to the vets and leave it at that alright????? thankyou..........

 

They can't let it go though HSC. The War on Terrorism has everything to do with oil and nothing to do with the WTC and Pentagon tragedies.

 

if you "value the troops" and want to see them brought home...they why the hell wernt you screaming for klinton's head during his 2nd term when he had our troops deployed all over the friggen place???....somalia, haiti , bosnia , serbia , and god knows where else he had them deployed that im forgetting about..and lest we forget klinton routinely bomb iraq..which you are screaming about bush wanting to do..

 

so why no recall of klinton from you???

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by baggio202

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by CubKilla

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

apu hon.. you know i love you dearly.. dont make me get pissed enough to come out there and kick your ass ok..... lets just say thanks to the vets and leave it at that alright????? thankyou..........

 

They can't let it go though HSC. The War on Terrorism has everything to do with oil and nothing to do with the WTC and Pentagon tragedies.

 

Simply, Clinton is no longer in power. I had shown great disgust at Clinton as well for his bombing of civilians and use of massive military force in areas.

I hate Clinton just as much as anybody. I don't want Bush to get the same innocent blood on his hands the same way that Clinton authorized it.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

SO WHO DO YOU THINK HELPED FUND THIS WHOLE THING? AND WHO DO YOU THINK BACKED THIS WHOLE THING UP WITH 100 % BLESSINGS?? THE FREAKIN POPE???? SADDAM IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME AS BIN LADEN, THEY ARE TWO OF A KIND.. ILL BET THEY ARE HUNKERED DOWN IN A BUNKER RIGHT NOW SMOKING HAVANNAS AS WE ARGUE THE ISSUE.....f*** ALL OF THEM OVER THERE BLAST THE s*** OUT OF THE f***ING SAND BOX AND BE DONE WITH IT ALREADY.... THIS s*** HAS TO BE STOPPED..... AND BOMBING IT IS THE MOST FEESABLE WAY TO DO IT.... HELL IT CANT ALL BE ABOUT OIL CAUSE IF THEY CARPET BOMB THE PLACE THERE WONT BE ANYTHING WORTH HAVING FOR A WHILE AOUND THOSE PARTS ANYHOW.........AND THAT INCLUDES OIL........

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

HOW IN THE f*** DO YOU FIGURE THAT A MASS ATTACK ON THE WTC WAS NOT DESERVING OF A MASS ATTACK ON THE PISS ANT COUNTRY WHICH HARBORS THE ASSHOLE WHO PLOTED IT.....YOU ARE f***ED UP IN YOUR BELIEFS... GO TOTE A GUN AND STAND A f***ING POST AND THEN COME BACK AND TELL ME HOW MUCH YOU VALUE THE TROOPS...... THOSE MEN AND WOMEN ARE PROUD AND THERE TO DO THEIR DUTY FOR THEIR COUNTRY AND THOSE WHO HAVE FALLEN IN THIS BULLs*** ATTACK ON US... TELL THE FAMILIES OF THOSE WTC FOLKS THAT THEIR DEATHS DONT DESERVE SOME REVENGE..............YOUR STARTING TO REALLY PISS ME OFF APU................

 

Afghanistan harbored the 9/11 attackers...and if we want to get technical 15 of them were born in Saudi Arabia.

 

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. SADDAM HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11!

Do I need to scream this from the mountaintops?

 

NAH, JUST JUMP OFF OF ONE.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

SO WHO DO YOU THINK HELPED FUND THIS WHOLE THING? AND WHO DO YOU THINK BACKED THIS WHOLE THING UP WITH 100 % BLESSINGS?? THE FREAKIN POPE???? SADDAM IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME AS BIN LADEN, THEY ARE TWO OF A KIND.. ILL BET THEY ARE HUNKERED DOWN IN A BUNKER RIGHT NOW SMOKING HAVANNAS  AS WE ARGUE THE ISSUE.....f*** ALL OF THEM OVER THERE BLAST THE s*** OUT OF THE f***ING SAND BOX AND BE DONE WITH IT ALREADY.... THIS s*** HAS TO BE STOPPED..... AND BOMBING IT IS THE MOST FEESABLE WAY TO DO IT.... HELL IT CANT ALL BE ABOUT OIL CAUSE IF THEY CARPET BOMB THE PLACE THERE WONT BE ANYTHING WORTH HAVING FOR A WHILE AOUND THOSE PARTS ANYHOW.........AND THAT INCLUDES OIL........

 

bin Laden's millions from his parent's oil and construction companies that he inherited has funded his fundamentalistic militant regime for years. also, bin Laden is an Islamic fundamentalist extremist that is VERY religious.

Saddam, on the other hand, if from a secular party and is not religious at all. In fact, many of the dissodent parties in Iraq are religious fundamentalist parties. Which shows that Saddam does not necessarily agree with bin Laden.

 

So, the slaughter of innocent civilians that may not agree with Saddam's policies is OK with you HSC? I highly doubt that. You hate Saddam, however there are MANY people over there that hate him for what he has done to Iraq (i.e. many grassroots parties in Iraq that don't like Saddam but lack the effective political power to do anything about it) and people won't vote for them due to the backlash.

 

A bombing campaign does nothing to oust Saddam, just kills people that obviously, Saddam doesn't give a flying f*** about.

 

If Saddam is the big threat as he is seen to be, then NATO or the UN should get rid of him. If the US got off the 'he has nukes and biological weapons' campaign and moved to...'holy s***, he's f***ing the Iraqi citizens up the ass with a 12 ft. poll and totally violating their human rights, something needs to be done to get rid of his dumb ass', then a deposition of him could be possible with minimal bloodshed.

 

I just take offense that the US is ready to rush in at the drop of a pin to depose him using bombs, DU, and nearly every weapon in our arsenal.

I don't want to see any more Iraqi civilians die and I don't want to see US troops be forced to die for economic interests instead of the more imporant human rights issues in the Iraqi territory.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Simply, Clinton is no longer in power.  I had shown great disgust at Clinton as well for his bombing of civilians and use of massive military force in areas. 

I hate Clinton just as much as anybody.  I don't want Bush to get the same innocent blood on his hands the same way that Clinton authorized it.

 

YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE MILITARY OR HOW ITS USED. EVERY TIME YOU OPEN UP YOUR YAP ABOUT US KILLING CIVILLIANS YOU DISPLAY YOUR OWN IGNORANCE. IF WE WERE TRYING TO WIPE OUT CIVILLIANS THEN IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN WOULD BE PARKING LOTS DEVOID OF LIFE. THE ONLY THING STOPPING US FROM KILLING EVERYONE IN THESE s***HOLES IS OUR DESIRE TO HELP THEIR PEOPLE AND TAKE DOWN THE f***TARDS THAT ARE IN CHARGE. THATS IT.

 

YOU ARE JUST IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE NO MILITARY FORCE IS JUSTIFIED TO YOU. EVER.

 

JUST A POINT OF CURIOSITY, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE TO RESPOND TO THE WTC ATTACKS IF IT WAS UP TO YOU?

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

HOW IN THE f*** DO YOU FIGURE THAT A MASS ATTACK ON THE WTC WAS NOT DESERVING OF A MASS ATTACK ON THE PISS ANT COUNTRY WHICH HARBORS THE ASSHOLE WHO PLOTED IT.....YOU ARE f***ED UP IN YOUR BELIEFS... GO TOTE A GUN AND STAND A f***ING POST AND THEN COME BACK AND TELL ME HOW MUCH YOU VALUE THE TROOPS...... THOSE MEN AND WOMEN ARE PROUD AND THERE TO DO THEIR DUTY FOR THEIR COUNTRY AND THOSE WHO HAVE FALLEN IN THIS BULLs*** ATTACK ON US... TELL THE FAMILIES OF THOSE WTC FOLKS THAT THEIR DEATHS DONT DESERVE SOME REVENGE..............YOUR STARTING TO REALLY PISS ME OFF APU................

 

Afghanistan harbored the 9/11 attackers...and if we want to get technical 15 of them were born in Saudi Arabia.

 

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. SADDAM HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11!

Do I need to scream this from the mountaintops?

 

NAH, JUST JUMP OFF OF ONE.

 

Aw, thanx Nuke.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Simply, Clinton is no longer in power.  I had shown great disgust at Clinton as well for his bombing of civilians and use of massive military force in areas. 

I hate Clinton just as much as anybody.  I don't want Bush to get the same innocent blood on his hands the same way that Clinton authorized it.

 

YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE MILITARY OR HOW ITS USED. EVERY TIME YOU OPEN UP YOUR YAP ABOUT US KILLING CIVILLIANS YOU DISPLAY YOUR OWN IGNORANCE. IF WE WERE TRYING TO WIPE OUT CIVILLIANS THEN IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN WOULD BE PARKING LOTS DEVOID OF LIFE. THE ONLY THING STOPPING US FROM KILLING EVERYONE IN THESE s***HOLES IS OUR DESIRE TO HELP THEIR PEOPLE AND TAKE DOWN THE f***TARDS THAT ARE IN CHARGE. THATS IT.

 

YOU ARE JUST IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE NO MILITARY FORCE IS JUSTIFIED TO YOU. EVER.

 

JUST A POINT OF CURIOSITY, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE TO RESPOND TO THE WTC ATTACKS IF IT WAS UP TO YOU?

 

 

Nuke, I'd actually go after the people responsible (aka Al Qaeda) NOT Saddam.

You yourself has admitted that we accidentally kill civilians during warfare and that it is a necessary vice.

 

And Nuke, are we gonna help Afghanistan just like we did in 1989? You know, rid them of the oppressor and then just let them fight it out for control and let them install another Taliban like regime?

 

The war on terror is just gonna be like the war on drugs...Remember that war when you couldn't buy drugs anymore after it was over? It's gonna be just like that!

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Simply, Clinton is no longer in power.  I had shown great disgust at Clinton as well for his bombing of civilians and use of massive military force in areas. 

I hate Clinton just as much as anybody.  I don't want Bush to get the same innocent blood on his hands the same way that Clinton authorized it.

 

YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE MILITARY OR HOW ITS USED. EVERY TIME YOU OPEN UP YOUR YAP ABOUT US KILLING CIVILLIANS YOU DISPLAY YOUR OWN IGNORANCE. IF WE WERE TRYING TO WIPE OUT CIVILLIANS THEN IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN WOULD BE PARKING LOTS DEVOID OF LIFE. THE ONLY THING STOPPING US FROM KILLING EVERYONE IN THESE s***HOLES IS OUR DESIRE TO HELP THEIR PEOPLE AND TAKE DOWN THE f***TARDS THAT ARE IN CHARGE. THATS IT.

 

YOU ARE JUST IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE NO MILITARY FORCE IS JUSTIFIED TO YOU. EVER.

 

JUST A POINT OF CURIOSITY, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE TO RESPOND TO THE WTC ATTACKS IF IT WAS UP TO YOU?

 

 

Nuke, I'd actually go after the people responsible (aka Al Qaeda) NOT Saddam.

You yourself has admitted that we accidentally kill civilians during warfare and that it is a necessary vice.

 

And Nuke, are we gonna help Afghanistan just like we did in 1989? You know, rid them of the oppressor and then just let them fight it out for control and let them install another Taliban like regime?

 

The war on terror is just gonna be like the war on drugs...Remember that war when you couldn't buy drugs anymore after it was over? It's gonna be just like that!

 

UHH

 

WE DID GO AFTER AL QUEADA. NOW THEY ARE ON THE RUN, THEY'RE RUNNING OUT OF MONEY AND ARE GROWING DESPERATE. THEIR LEADERS, THOSE THAT REMAIN, ARE COWERING IN CAVES SOMEWHERE BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID TO SHOW THEMSELVES TO A PREDATOR DRONE FLYING OVERHEAD READY TO SHOVE A HELLFIRE MISSILE UP THEIR ASS.

 

AS FOR IRAQ. MAYBE THERE IS NO IMMINENT THREAT OF ATTACK BUT WHY LET HIM GET TO THAT POINT. WE CANNOT AFFORD ANOTHER 9-11. THIS MEANS ACTING PRE-EMPTIVELY TO PROTECT OURSELVES. ID JUST LOVE FOR SADDAM TO CO-OPERATE & RESOLVE THIS PEACEFULLY, BUT IF HE DOESNT THEN HE NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

Right, but the citizenry and others in Iraq don't need to be held accountable.

 

and if we are going after Al Qaeda, I'd like to see them caught and put behind bars. Let's invest our time in that while keeping a watchful eye on Iraq.

 

Why not do both: stop Iraq from getting powerful and also go after and get Al Qaeda?

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Originally posted by hotsoxchick1

SO WHO DO YOU THINK HELPED FUND THIS WHOLE THING? AND WHO DO YOU THINK BACKED THIS WHOLE THING UP WITH 100 % BLESSINGS?? THE FREAKIN POPE???? SADDAM IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME AS BIN LADEN, THEY ARE TWO OF A KIND.. ILL BET THEY ARE HUNKERED DOWN IN A BUNKER RIGHT NOW SMOKING HAVANNAS  AS WE ARGUE THE ISSUE.....f*** ALL OF THEM OVER THERE BLAST THE s*** OUT OF THE f***ING SAND BOX AND BE DONE WITH IT ALREADY.... THIS s*** HAS TO BE STOPPED..... AND BOMBING IT IS THE MOST FEESABLE WAY TO DO IT.... HELL IT CANT ALL BE ABOUT OIL CAUSE IF THEY CARPET BOMB THE PLACE THERE WONT BE ANYTHING WORTH HAVING FOR A WHILE AOUND THOSE PARTS ANYHOW.........AND THAT INCLUDES OIL........

 

bin Laden's millions from his parent's oil and construction companies that he inherited has funded his fundamentalistic militant regime for years. also, bin Laden is an Islamic fundamentalist extremist that is VERY religious.

Saddam, on the other hand, if from a secular party and is not religious at all. In fact, many of the dissodent parties in Iraq are religious fundamentalist parties. Which shows that Saddam does not necessarily agree with bin Laden.

 

So, the slaughter of innocent civilians that may not agree with Saddam's policies is OK with you HSC? I highly doubt that. You hate Saddam, however there are MANY people over there that hate him for what he has done to Iraq (i.e. many grassroots parties in Iraq that don't like Saddam but lack the effective political power to do anything about it) and people won't vote for them due to the backlash.

 

A bombing campaign does nothing to oust Saddam, just kills people that obviously, Saddam doesn't give a flying f*** about.

 

If Saddam is the big threat as he is seen to be, then NATO or the UN should get rid of him. If the US got off the 'he has nukes and biological weapons' campaign and moved to...'holy s***, he's f***ing the Iraqi citizens up the ass with a 12 ft. poll and totally violating their human rights, something needs to be done to get rid of his dumb ass', then a deposition of him could be possible with minimal bloodshed.

 

I just take offense that the US is ready to rush in at the drop of a pin to depose him using bombs, DU, and nearly every weapon in our arsenal.

I don't want to see any more Iraqi civilians die and I don't want to see US troops be forced to die for economic interests instead of the more imporant human rights issues in the Iraqi territory.

 

 

see where your wrong here apu is the fact that saddam and bin laden are quite much alike.. they both have a common interest and thats making the united states look like jackasses.. .they both harbor the same hatred for us .......they are much alike in many other ways... they both hide behind their civilians and such to fight for their own issues and causes.. they use their civilians to make us look bad .. oh look at the big bad us they are fighting poor us the third world country and hurting our civilians.. they use those people and those people gladly let themselves be used......while i dont condone the outright slaughter of innocents. i do however believe they are casualities of war which happens.... so f***ing what... they didnt blink twice when we were at so called peace time and drove airplanes into our buildings did they?? no ... how many f***ing faces do you need to see jumping for joy over there in the sand box on the nitely news after the wtc happened......those smiling jovial faces make me believe that they are backing the ideas and their leaders in their decisions.. i didnt see bin laden holding guns to their heads while they were rejoycing in the streets and burning american flags.... and saddam was nowhere to be found either.... sure bin laden had money and stuff but saddam also put his share of time and effort in this believe me.......and if you think its all about oil and stuff you are wrong.... there wont be enough oil to power a lawn mower for a while over there after a full blown carpet bombing takes place... f*** THOSE ASSHOLES OVER THERE.. THEY DESERVE WHAT EVER COMES THEIR WAY... AND IF IT BE IN THE FORM OF TOTAL DISTRUCTION THEN SO BE IT... THATS WHAT THEY GET FOR MESSING WITH THE USA.................IN THIS CASE NOONE IS INNOCENT UNTILL PROVEN SO AND SO FAR NOONES STEPPED FOWARD TO PROVE IT..........f*** EM ALL LET THEM DIE A MISERABLE DEATH JUST LIKE THOSE AMERICANS AND OTHER PEOPLE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES WHO WERE PART OF THE WTC BOMBINGS......THOSE WHO WERE ALL INNOCENT BY THE WAY...........

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

Right, but the citizenry and others in Iraq don't need to be held accountable.

 

and if we are going after Al Qaeda, I'd like to see them caught and put behind bars.  Let's invest our time in that while keeping a watchful eye on Iraq.

 

Why not do both:  stop Iraq from getting powerful and also go after and get Al Qaeda?

 

PUT PEOPLE BEHIND BARS THAT HAD A HAND IN KILLING 3000 AMERICANS? I THINK NOT. WHILE DEATH IS TOO GOOD FOR THESE SUB-HUMAN COCK SUCKERS IT IS THE WORST FATE WE CAN GIVE THEM.

 

2 MORE THINGS

 

1. IF WE GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ WE ARE NOT GOING THERE TO KILL CIVILLIANS. PLEASE GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.

 

2. WE'VE BEEN WATCHING IRAQ FOR 12 YEARS NOW. ENOUGH IS f***ING ENOUGH.

[LowerCaseRepublican]

You don't think throwing these f***s in a prison where they'll get forced to be Bubba's girlfriend every day for the rest of their lives is torture?

 

Come on, every day will be a living hell for them. They'd beg us for death...

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

no actually i dont.. i think that throwing them into prison with a bunch of women running the joint would have better effects... but since that wont happen and i dont really want my hard earned tax dollars wasted keeping them alive for the next 50 or so years...and i think they better spent on educating our kids for the future.... i believe that if they meet a demise with carpet bombing or are themselves fallen as casuality of war it would make me alot happier........ f*** them both and all..........

[Chisoxfn]

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

 

PUT PEOPLE BEHIND BARS THAT HAD A HAND IN KILLING 3000 AMERICANS?  I THINK NOT.  WHILE DEATH IS TOO GOOD FOR THESE SUB-HUMAN COCK SUCKERS IT IS THE WORST FATE WE CAN GIVE THEM.

 

2 MORE THINGS

 

1. IF WE GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ WE ARE NOT GOING THERE TO KILL CIVILLIANS.  PLEASE GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.

 

2.  WE'VE BEEN WATCHING IRAQ FOR 12 YEARS NOW.  ENOUGH IS f***ING ENOUGH.

 

Well I have kind of got a bit lost in this thread, so I'll start from here. My favorite thing about this Iraq situation is we aren't going their for the civilians. It isn't their fault that they have Saddam running their country and it is only Saddam that should be effected and his groups and infastructure. We destroy that and then position the country to the point where Iraq can nominate someone else to take charge.

 

Ya, its kind of like nation building, but sometimes people need some help and I think Iraq doesn't really want Saddam their anyway and even if they don't, we have to protect our well being as they are one of our major threats.

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by sideshowapu

You don't think throwing these f***s in a prison where they'll get forced to be Bubba's girlfriend every day for the rest of their lives is torture?

 

Come on, every day will be a living hell for them.  They'd beg us for death...

 

YOU TALK ABOUT THESE TERRORISTS AS THOUGH THEY WERE SOME FLUNKIES THAT HELD UP A LIQUOR STORE. THEY KILLED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE. THE ONLY THING LEFT NOW FOR US TO DO IS WASTE EVERY ONE OF THEM RESPONSIBLE.

[Guest hotsoxchick1]

AMEN NUKE.. PREACH ON MY LITTLE BROTHER..............

[NUKE_CLEVELAND]

Originally posted by Chisoxfn

Originally posted by NUKE_CLEVELAND

 

PUT PEOPLE BEHIND BARS THAT HAD A HAND IN KILLING 3000 AMERICANS?  I THINK NOT.  WHILE DEATH IS TOO GOOD FOR THESE SUB-HUMAN COCK SUCKERS IT IS THE WORST FATE WE CAN GIVE THEM.

 

2 MORE THINGS

 

1. IF WE GO TO WAR WITH IRAQ WE ARE NOT GOING THERE TO KILL CIVILLIANS.  PLEASE GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.

 

2.  WE'VE BEEN WATCHING IRAQ FOR 12 YEARS NOW.  ENOUGH IS f***ING ENOUGH.

 

Well I have kind of got a bit lost in this thread, so I'll start from here. My favorite thing about this Iraq situation is we aren't going their for the civilians. It isn't their fault that they have Saddam running their country and it is only Saddam that should be effected and his groups and infastructure. We destroy that and then position the country to the point where Iraq can nominate someone else to take charge.

 

Ya, its kind of like nation building, but sometimes people need some help and I think Iraq doesn't really want Saddam their anyway and even if they don't, we have to protect our well being as they are one of our major threats.

 

THERE YA GO. NOW YOU'VE GOT IT.