Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 WTF! If you go to MLB.com all you see is "Prior looking for cloud 9" "Reuter looking for 8th victory" "Halladay wins 10th straight" "Clemens throws a gem, but gets ND"! What the hell! Loaiza won his 10th game, has the 2nd best ERA in the ML, has won 1 more game than he did ALL of last year, and he still gets no respest. f*** THE MEDIA AND GO SOX!!!!! HE aint gettin attention becuase he is on the White Stockings are were sturggling.....HE'LL have to wait for the all-star game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 in 2000, none of the sports channels wanted to show the Sox cuz it would get so little ratings. Thats why they were all day games on ESPN. Well, that was more because FOX wanted the Yankees in prime-time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Maybe you should fix that quote feature Jason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Maybe you should fix that quote feature Jason. I thought he did...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 I thought he did...? Yeah so did he. Turned out it only worked in certain forums or something strange like that. He'd have to explain it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Maybe you should fix that quote feature Jason. Whats wrong with it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Whats wrong with it? I don't understand what happens, cause when I reply to a post, only the latest quote shows up, but with others the whole quote is picked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 I don't understand what happens, cause when I reply to a post, only the latest quote shows up, but with others the whole quote is picked up. Test...Test Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Test...Test It doesn't like us...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 It doesn't like us...? Or maybe it does? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 It doesn't like us...? Seeing if it's something in my browser or forum settings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Or maybe it does? See, it confuses the hell out of me, lol. I'll never understand some of this coding. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AssHatSoxFan Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot omg i will not let this die here is one to keep it alive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Once a quote thing is inserted the whole thing keeps going. I think somehow one person manually does the quote instead of simply hitting reply with quote and thats why its starts off. not sure on that though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. ROTFLMAO!! It's pretty funny looking. Wonder how long it will get... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? Strange how the word rapist perfectly in the center... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Once a quote thing is inserted the whole thing keeps going. I think somehow one person manually does the quote instead of simply hitting reply with quote and thats why its starts off. not sure on that though. Oh good.. then it's clujers fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Once a quote thing is inserted the whole thing keeps going. I think somehow one person manually does the quote instead of simply hitting reply with quote and thats why its starts off. not sure on that though. How would you do that manually? Are you thinking hit quote and then change the code in the quote box? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 How would you do that manually? Are you thinking hit quote and then change the code in the quote box? I think people hit quote in the post box, instead of hitting reply with quote and then just typing in. Thats just a guess though. I know that if you insert quote codes and stuff, then the quotes don't erase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.