Jump to content

Loaiza getting


SoxFan1

Recommended Posts

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

WTF! If you go to MLB.com all you see is "Prior looking for cloud 9" "Reuter looking for 8th victory" "Halladay wins 10th straight" "Clemens throws a gem, but gets ND"! What the hell! Loaiza won his 10th game, has the 2nd best ERA in the ML, has won 1 more game than he did ALL of last year, and he still gets no respest. f*** THE MEDIA AND GO SOX!!!!!

HE aint gettin attention becuase he is on the White Stockings are were sturggling.....HE'LL have to wait for the all-star game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

omg i will not let this die here is one to keep it alive :cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.

Shall we try to create forum art?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.

ROTFLMAO!!

 

It's pretty funny looking. Wonder how long it will get...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.

Shall we try to create forum art?

Strange how the word rapist perfectly in the center...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once a quote thing is inserted the whole thing keeps going.  I think somehow one person manually does the quote instead of simply hitting reply with quote and thats why its starts off.  not sure on that though.

Oh good.. then it's clujers fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once a quote thing is inserted the whole thing keeps going.  I think somehow one person manually does the quote instead of simply hitting reply with quote and thats why its starts off.  not sure on that though.

How would you do that manually? Are you thinking hit quote and then change the code in the quote box?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my facts straight.

 

He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER.

 

As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn.

 

 

Those are the FACTS.

Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a

 

RAPIST

 

People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them.

The difference is the Polanski was convicted.

You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking?

Reading comprehension problem, again, today?

 

You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon.

And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty

Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty?

Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that.

I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature...

This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? :D

just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others :D

How many quotes can we add?

A lot :D

:o

Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive.

Shall we try to create forum art?

The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center...

It is kind of fun until the forum crashes :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you do that manually? Are you thinking hit quote and then change the code in the quote box?

I think people hit quote in the post box, instead of hitting reply with quote and then just typing in.

 

Thats just a guess though. I know that if you insert quote codes and stuff, then the quotes don't erase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...