BrandoFan Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 [QU=Texsox,Jun 19 2003, 10:37 PM] 19 2003, 07:11 PM] [quote=As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others try to create forum art? [/colghfhf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 I think people hit quote in the post box, instead of hitting reply with quote and then just typing in. Thats just a guess though. I know that if you insert quote codes and stuff, then the quotes don't erase. I always hit quote when I'm quoting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo THAT explains it all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 I always hit quote when I'm quoting. I always hit the quote button which brings up a new thread with the quote already taken out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 19, 2003 Author Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 19, 2003 Author Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! That I do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 LOL, this thread is kinda pretty looking. My fault? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted June 19, 2003 Share Posted June 19, 2003 LOL, this thread is kinda pretty looking. My fault? I don't even remember now, but all those quotes pisses me off. :finger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 20, 2003 Share Posted June 20, 2003 Back on the original topic.... Loaiza, as of this point in time, does deserve to start the All Star game. He has been the best pitcher in the AL, bar none. However, all these guys have about 4 starts left so the issue is really moot at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 20, 2003 Author Share Posted June 20, 2003 YASNY, I agree 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 20, 2003 Share Posted June 20, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! That I do. BACK to page 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iguana Posted June 20, 2003 Share Posted June 20, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! That I do. BACK to page 1 wow...this is getting long.... lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 21, 2003 Share Posted June 21, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! That I do. BACK to page 1 wow...this is getting long.... lol NO its just ya imagination Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 22, 2003 Author Share Posted June 22, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! That I do. BACK to page 1 wow...this is getting long.... lol NO its just ya imagination Boy, this got WAAAAAAAAAAY off topic and loooooooooong! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted June 22, 2003 Share Posted June 22, 2003 Reading this post caused me to have a seizure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted June 22, 2003 Author Share Posted June 22, 2003 Yeah, and we found ot the limit of quotes for 1 post is 25! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Showtime Posted June 22, 2003 Share Posted June 22, 2003 Reading this post caused me to have a seizure. For some reason, reading that made me laugh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 22, 2003 Share Posted June 22, 2003 Got my facts straight. He has NOT been charged with RAPE, and since not ONE underage girl is willing to press charges, to call him a RAPIST is SLANDER. As disgusting and vile as he is - and I DO think he IS a child rapist, he is "only" accused of possessing child porn. Those are the FACTS. Then R Kelly can come after me and charge me with "slander" (verbal) or "libel" (written) because i'm calling him a RAPIST People like Roman Polanski and R Kelly shouldn't be making 1 penny from their "art" because they are disgusting, cowardly, heartless people. :fyou them. The difference is the Polanski was convicted. You're right, everyone who's guilty gets convicted. What was I thinking? Reading comprehension problem, again, today? You can call Polanski a rapist without someone saying "no he isn't" because he was convicted. R Kelly.. has not yet been, however if there is a God he will be soon. And you're right again, everyone who's convicted is guilty Are you saying that Polanski isn't guilty? Refer to a previous post of mine regarding Polanski for the answer to that. I will have to say that the funniest part of this whole lengthy exchange is Clu's signature... This sure does make a pretty picture. How did we go from E-Lo getting no respect to, well this? just admiring the picture with in a picture infinity effect. Nothing really to add. But then either did a few others How many quotes can we add? A lot Not with the other thread, but with this one. It seems as if something in this thread is keeping it alive. Shall we try to create forum art? The irony of the word rapist perfectly in the center... It is kind of fun until the forum crashes That won't happen... will it..? I hope not. This thing is making me dizzy. And to think it all started with an 8th grader and a question about e-lo What you got against 8th graders! By the way R.Kelly IS a rapist! Hes like 30 something and hes f***ing 7th graders! I cal it rape! And the law seems to agree with you in general... Too bad it's all a moot point, everyone knows it wasn't him on the tape. And with some luck, the judge/jury will confirm that for you in case your own eyes raised some doubts. At least someone agreesz! That I do. BACK to page 1 wow...this is getting long.... lol NO its just ya imagination Boy, this got WAAAAAAAAAAY off topic and loooooooooong! SAY'S who Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted June 22, 2003 Share Posted June 22, 2003 Yeah, and we found ot the limit of quotes for 1 post is 25! I just add a 26 quote ....... AND on a side not-If ya like scenery go to the top and hold page down and prepare to look amazed and ahh get a seizure. BE GOOD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.