kapkomet Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 What is you all's opinions on PAC's? (waits and grabs some popcorn). I'll tell you my thoughts on it in a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUKE_CLEVELAND Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Oct 24, 2006 -> 10:12 PM) What is you all's opinions on PAC's? (waits and grabs some popcorn). I'll tell you my thoughts on it in a bit. PAC's should all get a nice muddy bootprint on their behinds from getting kicked out of Washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Another good arguement for campaign finance report is right here... It seems Hillary Clinton isn't happy with a 32 point lead over her opponent in the race for Senator of NY. She is spending heavily hoping to use it as a statement of her broad appeal nationally in case she decides to indeed run for President. She has spent $10 million in the last quarter for a race that has never been in doubt. How does that make any sense? http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/The...06/clinton.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 24, 2006 -> 09:32 PM) I agree on all the above, except maybe a modified version of point number one. I do think candidates should have free TV and radio time, and that any other window for use would be very limited. This I'd like to hear your explanation of. What possible good does anything other than a popular vote do for a national office? Because as I see it, anything other than that disenfranchises some people. I meant eliminated. One person = one vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts