greasywheels121 Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 If you say "NO" provide the 10 teams that should go ahead of ND. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spod=Ratings Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Wedge @ Nov 29, 2006 -> 10:40 PM) If you say "NO" provide the 10 teams that should go ahead of ND. Ohio St Mich USC Louisville Boise St. Florida Wisc Florida Oklahoma Arkansas If you say no to a couple LSU and Auburn could go as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 (edited) It's very simple. YES, they deserve to go. The way the BCS has played out this year, there are only two other teams that could possibly be chosen over them, Virginia Tech and Louisville if they finish 2nd to Louisville. Theoretically, West Virginia could gain eligibility if Rutgers loses, but why would you take a team that just lost to South Florida? Folks there are NO other options unless Cal finds a way to vault 4 spots in the BCS this weekend, which won't happen. So simplify the question. If you were a bowl committee, would you choose Virginia Tech or Louisville over Notre Dame. The answer is simple. HELL NO Notre Dame is in, so stop the whining!! QUOTE(Spod=Ratings @ Nov 29, 2006 -> 11:05 PM) Ohio St - already in Mich - already in USC - already in Louisville - will be them or Rutgers Boise St. - already in Florida - already in Wisc - not eligible Florida - I think you meant LSU here since Florida was listed above. LSU is in unless Arkansas beats Florida, then Florida and Arkansas are in and LSU is out Oklahoma - - will be in or Nebraska, not both Arkansas - only if they beat Florida If you say no to a couple LSU and Auburn could go as well Edited November 30, 2006 by Rex Hudler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Wedge @ Nov 29, 2006 -> 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If you say "NO" provide the 10 teams that should go ahead of ND. 1. Ohio State 2. USC 3. Michigan 4. Florida 5. LSU 6. Louisville 7. Oklahoma 8. Arkansas 9. Boise State 10. Auburn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spod=Ratings Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(Rex Hudler @ Nov 29, 2006 -> 11:28 PM) It's very simple. YES, they deserve to go. The way the BCS has played out this year, there are only two other teams that could possibly be chosen over them, Virginia Tech and Louisville if they finish 2nd to Louisville. Theoretically, West Virginia could gain eligibility if Rutgers loses, but why would you take a team that just lost to South Florida? Folks there are NO other options unless Cal finds a way to vault 4 spots in the BCS this weekend, which won't happen. So simplify the question. If you were a bowl committee, would you choose Virginia Tech or Louisville over Notre Dame. The answer is simple. HELL NO Notre Dame is in, so stop the whining!! Yeah i meant LSU, and trust me i know ND will be in a BCS Bowl, but they just scared me off after the Mich and ND Losses, i mean they didnt really even compete. I am no way a ND Hater either. Just My Opinion Edited November 30, 2006 by Spod=Ratings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Hudler Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Spod=Ratings @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 01:56 AM) Yeah i meant LSU, and trust me i know ND will be in a BCS Bowl, but they just scared me off after the Mich and ND Losses, i mean they didnt really even compete. I am no way a ND Hater either. Just My Opinion The I ask again. If they don't deserve it, who does? Va Tech? Louisville? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AssHatSoxFan Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(southsideirish @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 01:07 AM) 1. Ohio State 2. USC 3. Michigan 4. Florida 5. LSU 6. Louisville 7. Oklahoma 8. Arkansas 9. Boise State 10. Auburn the problem is that you cannot have 3 teams from one single conference which leaves auburn and arkansas out; then you get a weak ACC which only gets 1 team in since VaTech probably isn't high enough to garner an at large; now unless rutgers win this weekend and someone else wants to take a 1 loss louisville team ND still will most likely get in whether people think they will be or not it's all about bringing the fans and getting the money to these bowls and ND will do that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasywheels121 Posted November 30, 2006 Author Share Posted November 30, 2006 The conference limitation rule should be axed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 No. Because I hate ND. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spod=Ratings Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Rex Hudler @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 06:08 AM) The I ask again. If they don't deserve it, who does? Va Tech? Louisville? Well i think Other teams like, Wisc, Arkansas, and Aubrun DESERVE it more, but ND will get it. Lets Just get rid of the frickin BCS. Please... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 Guys, the question wasn't who WOULD go ahead of Notre Dame, since clearly they will be in. The question is who do you think DESERVES to go ahead of them. In the latter case being the third team from a conference doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 (edited) The 3rd team rule was started prior to there being more BCS bowl games. When a situation presents itself such as if Wisconsin, Michigan, and OSU all had 1 loss, and by virtue of big 10 rules Wisconsin had to be champ, you know the next year the rule would be changed so that the BCS could have gotten both OSU and Michigan. It sucks for Wisconsin because they are a legitimate BCS team, only losing to Michigan this year. It also sucks for college football, because it gives a team like Wisconsin no incentive to schedule better teams. They might as well schedule powder puffs and hope for the best. Edited November 30, 2006 by Soxbadger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pauly8509CWS Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 I'm so sick of ND and their b****ing about rankings. Because, you know what, for that JV schedule they play, they sure as hell should be able to win at least 9 games, and hell, for being ranked in the preseason top 5, they should at least be able to beat one of the two good teams they played. And instead, they got their asses kicked by Michigan and USC, and should be embarassed for even playing a close game against MSU. Voters are a disgrace for their blind love of all things ND. And I swear to god, if I hear how great of a coach Fat Boy is again, I'm going to set the entire College Gameday setup on fire next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Pauly8509CWS @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 01:34 PM) I'm so sick of ND and their b****ing about rankings. Because, you know what, for that JV schedule they play, they sure as hell should be able to win at least 9 games, and hell, for being ranked in the preseason top 5, they should at least be able to beat one of the two good teams they played. And instead, they got their asses kicked by Michigan and USC, and should be embarassed for even playing a close game against MSU. Voters are a disgrace for their blind love of all things ND. And I swear to god, if I hear how great of a coach Fat Boy is again, I'm going to set the entire College Gameday setup on fire next week. Don't hold anything back man, tell us how you really feel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Rowand44 @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 01:45 PM) Don't hold anything back man, tell us how you really feel. Yeah, totally feel free to continue, I personally am loving it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 QUOTE(Pauly8509CWS @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 02:34 PM) I'm so sick of ND and their b****ing about rankings. Because, you know what, for that JV schedule they play, they sure as hell should be able to win at least 9 games, and hell, for being ranked in the preseason top 5, they should at least be able to beat one of the two good teams they played. And instead, they got their asses kicked by Michigan and USC, and should be embarassed for even playing a close game against MSU. Voters are a disgrace for their blind love of all things ND. And I swear to god, if I hear how great of a coach Fat Boy is again, I'm going to set the entire College Gameday setup on fire next week. Wisconsin has a JV schedule, just like ND's. Actually, ND played 2 elite teams this year, Wisconsin played 1. at Bowling Green WESTERN ILLINOIS SAN DIEGO STATE at Michigan at Indiana NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA at Purdue ILLINOIS PENN STATE at Iowa BUFFALO ND would be 1-loss playing that schedule. Hell, maybe they'd catch a few breaks and even beat Michigan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He_Gawn Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 QUOTE(Pauly8509CWS @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 07:34 PM) I'm so sick of ND and their b****ing about rankings. Because, you know what, for that JV schedule they play, they sure as hell should be able to win at least 9 games, and hell, for being ranked in the preseason top 5, they should at least be able to beat one of the two good teams they played. And instead, they got their asses kicked by Michigan and USC, and should be embarassed for even playing a close game against MSU. Voters are a disgrace for their blind love of all things ND. And I swear to god, if I hear how great of a coach Fat Boy is again, I'm going to set the entire College Gameday setup on fire next week. I think its just imature to make fun of Weis and his weight. He almost died going through gastric bypass and was in coma several days, thus the limp. But of course, you must find something to make fun of him for because his coaching skills are unprecedented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aboz56 Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 They played two really good teams this year and got spanked by both. No way in hell they deserve to be in. No defense and they are as soft as they come in college football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 Wisconsin would beat ND. Sorry but they both played Michigan, and Wisconsin played them much better. If anything it is possible had Wisconsin played Michigan later in the season when their WR's started to play much better that Wisconsin could have had a chance to beat Michigan. Not to mention Michigan played at ND, where as Wisconsin played at the Big House. You seem to believe that because ND played a better team USC, and lost, that they are some how better than Wisconsin. Wisconsin beat the same quality of teams as ND. I dont see why losing to a team should get you bonus points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg The Bull Luzinski Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 ND would be much more credible if they did not play teams like army and navy and joined conference to play real compentition. I would love to see ND v. Wisconsin. The fact that ND plays a JV schedule as was previous credibility earns them a lot of disrespect. It adds fuel to the fire for ND haters. Playing a real schedule would go a long way to saying STFU to ND haters like me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 The shame is, if Wisconsin could have been taken for the BCS, its likely both them and ND would have been in it, and possibly played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotop Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 2006 Strength of Schedule for teams in question (courtesy of Jeff Sagarin, contributor to the BCS formula): OSU: 36th USC: 3rd Michigan: 13th LSU: 25th Louisville: 31st Florida: 27th Cal: 2nd Arkansas: 49th Tennessee: 10th Boise State: 99th ND: 19th Auburn: 29th Rutgers: 63rd West Virginia: 48th Wisconsin: 85th But, but ND plays an awful schedule!!!111 But really, what I find most hilarious is all of the haters whining about media bias for ND. You do realize a large amount of poll voters, other coaches, media types, etc. DESPISE ND? For every one ND lover there's at least 2 ND haters. In terms of bowls, it's about money, like it or not. It's not like this is a new concept either...the entire reason bowls exist is for revenue. Why do you think there's 30+ of them? ND is a national brand, travels well, and gets high ratings. Music to the networks and bowl organizers ears. Yea, it's not "fair", it's capitalism. Welcome to America. Only solution to stopping "undeserving" teams is a playoff. And barring some miracle, that doesn't look like it's happening soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoomSlowik Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 QUOTE(Fotop @ Nov 30, 2006 -> 08:38 PM) 2006 Strength of Schedule for teams in question (courtesy of Jeff Sagarin, contributor to the BCS formula): OSU: 36th USC: 3rd Michigan: 13th LSU: 25th Louisville: 31st Florida: 27th Cal: 2nd Arkansas: 49th Tennessee: 10th Boise State: 99th ND: 19th Auburn: 29th Rutgers: 63rd West Virginia: 48th Wisconsin: 85th But, but ND plays an awful schedule!!!111 Yeah, because it's easy to create an accurate mathematical ranking of schedule strength. Penn State and UCLA are clearly top 25 teams like they are in Sagarin's rankings, and Navy is clearly your typical 8-3 team even though their best wins are against Duke and Air Force. It shouldn't be that hard to figure out that any system that has Notre Dame ahead of LSU in strength of schedule is totally bogus. LSU had to play at Auburn, at Florida, at Tennessee, and at Arkansas. That's 4 very tough games, and it's a major reason that LSU has 2 losses despite significant talent. They also played 3 other teams .500 or better from major conferences. ND's first 3 games were pretty tough, but after that they were able to coast until playing USC. They played 5 very bad teams and another pretty bad one in MSU. Most teams don't get that kind of break in the middle of their season. At best it was a passable schedule, but it certainly wasn't particularly strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.