ptatc Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 I truly cannot think of words to describe this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHizzle85 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 QUOTE(ptatc @ Jan 12, 2007 -> 01:52 PM) I truly cannot think of words to describe this one. Insanity? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gar102 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 I am sure Schoeneweis couldn't get his pen out quick enough to sign it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCSox Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 LMFAO!!! Please tell me again we shouldn't be loading up on arms right now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Scary thing is...with the way that Mets rotation is sitting right now, he might legitimately have a shot at starting for them at some point this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSOX45 Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jan 12, 2007 -> 05:50 PM) Scary thing is...with the way that Mets rotation is sitting right now, he might legitimately have a shot at starting for them at some point this year. Omar isn't done dealing yet. He is still looking to add another arm, I am surprised though that Scott got that large of a contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 Schoenweis actually looked good as a starter for like 2 months, than all downhill from there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jan 12, 2007 -> 11:04 PM) Schoenweis actually looked good as a starter for like 2 months, than all downhill from there. I'm not sure what numbers you're looking at, but he had a 5.59 ERA in 19 starts, so I don't think he ever really looked good as a starter... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnB Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jan 12, 2007 -> 11:46 PM) I'm not sure what numbers you're looking at, but he had a 5.59 ERA in 19 starts, so I don't think he ever really looked good as a starter... that first 2-3 months in 04, he was our most consistent starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jan 12, 2007 -> 11:46 PM) I'm not sure what numbers you're looking at, but he had a 5.59 ERA in 19 starts, so I don't think he ever really looked good as a starter... 04/08/04 - 05/30/04 (April-May): 10 GS, 5-2, 3.64 ERA, 1.31 WHIP 06/01/04 - 10/02/04 (June-Sept): 9 GS, 1-7, 8.19 ERA, 1.86 WHIP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jan 12, 2007 -> 11:46 PM) I'm not sure what numbers you're looking at, but he had a 5.59 ERA in 19 starts, so I don't think he ever really looked good as a starter... QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jan 13, 2007 -> 12:12 AM) 04/08/04 - 05/30/04 (April-May): 10 GS, 5-2, 3.64 ERA, 1.31 WHIP 06/01/04 - 10/02/04 (June-Sept): 9 GS, 1-7, 8.19 ERA, 1.86 WHIP I miss the simple pwnAg3 like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.