Jump to content

From the party of peace....


EvilMonkey

Recommended Posts

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,253400,00.html

Virginia Man Faces Charges for Assaulting Republicans

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

 

FREDERICKSBURG, Va. — A Fredericksburg man is facing several assault charges after police say he hunted down a group of Republicans and confronted them in their home over their beliefs.

 

Police said Andrew Stone, 23, recently went to a home in Fredericksburg at around 5:30 p.m. after he saw a name and nearby address on a Republican Web site.

 

Stone confronted three residents about their political viewpoints, police said. When he found out the residents supported the Republican-led war effort in Iraq, police say Stone became enraged.

 

Stone then hit the homeowner and his roommates several times as they tried to force him out of the door, police said.

 

Stone faces three counts of assault and battery

I am suprised he managed to find 2 Republicans in Virginia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Feb 21, 2007 -> 10:24 PM)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,253400,00.html

 

I am suprised he managed to find 2 Republicans in Virginia.

 

yeah i'd be surprised to find republicans in virginia too... ya know, the state that was so closely contested in the last election and was BARELY won by the democrat... and the state that has been red for the last few presidential elections... wait... that means there have to be a LOT of republicans huh? yeah... thought so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Reddy @ Feb 21, 2007 -> 10:46 PM)
yeah i'd be surprised to find republicans in virginia too... ya know, the state that was so closely contested in the last election and was BARELY won by the democrat... and the state that has been red for the last few presidential elections... wait... that means there have to be a LOT of republicans huh? yeah... thought so...

thought so what, that you are being a little prick nitpicky by harping on my lame attempt at humor instead of the real life humor in a peace-loving Democrat starting a fight with someone they didn't know and tracked down from a website over their political beliefs? Yeah, that must be it.

Edited by Alpha Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Feb 21, 2007 -> 11:56 PM)
thought so what, that you are being a little prick nitpicky by harping on my lame attempt at humor instead of the real life humor in a peace-loving Democrat starting a fight with someone they didn't know and tracked down from a website over their political beliefs? Yeah, that must be it.

Careful -- you talk that way to us Dems and you take your chances. :fight

 

My favorite part of this is a Republican admitting that his party comes second when it comes to an interest in peace. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Feb 21, 2007 -> 11:56 PM)
thought so what, that you are being a little prick nitpicky by harping on my lame attempt at humor instead of the real life humor in a peace-loving Democrat starting a fight with someone they didn't know and tracked down from a website over their political beliefs? Yeah, that must be it.

 

Sometimes the green you think is overkill is the most important green of all. :)

 

And for the record. I recognized your lame humor a mile away.

 

(I think that was a complement. . . :unsure: ) :) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy obviously has some problems. First, being a Socialist, second, some anger management. BTW if this was an attempt at poking a little fun at Dems, they can be the same blood thirsty killers as Republicans when the cause is right. Kill them mother f***ers kill! Don't show us the body bags, just kill.

 

:lolhitting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Feb 21, 2007 -> 10:24 PM)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,253400,00.html

 

I am suprised he managed to find 2 Republicans in Virginia.

I think its interesting that the assumption is, because this guy dislikes Republicans, he must be a Democrat. There are other options you know.

 

But I did find the article, and Dog's line about Republicans in VA, sort of humorous. People are dumb.

Edited by NorthSideSox72
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Feb 22, 2007 -> 08:03 AM)
I think its interesting that the assumption is, because this guy dislikes Republicans, he must be a Democrat. There are other options you know.

 

But I did find the article, and Dog's line about Republicans in VA, sort of humorous. People are dumb.

 

What? Like an Independent? Like they are really any of those. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Feb 23, 2007 -> 04:52 PM)
I actually hope the three of you are kidding.

I honestly hope all of you are kidding.

 

Seriously, when in the world will people learn to stop trying to use the "Group guilt" fallacy to blame everyone who disagrees with them for the actions of a few crazy people? And this goes for an awful lot of topics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Feb 23, 2007 -> 10:48 PM)
I honestly hope all of you are kidding.

 

Seriously, when in the world will people learn to stop trying to use the "Group guilt" fallacy to blame everyone who disagrees with them for the actions of a few crazy people? And this goes for an awful lot of topics.

 

There was no group guilt implied, you should recognize that. Chet made a comment that was so over-the-top ignorant (the comment not the poster) – that "passionate pro-lifers have never taken lives for their anti-abortion causes" – and a reasonable person could only assume that this was a sarcastic comment.

 

No reply yet from Chet, however, so maybe the comment was made in earnest. If, so it is an entirely uninformed comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Feb 25, 2007 -> 10:44 AM)
There was no group guilt implied, you should recognize that. Chet made a comment that was so over-the-top ignorant (the comment not the poster) – that "passionate pro-lifers have never taken lives for their anti-abortion causes" – and a reasonable person could only assume that this was a sarcastic comment.

 

No reply yet from Chet, however, so maybe the comment was made in earnest. If, so it is an entirely uninformed comment.

Look at his other posts. It was CLEARLY sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Feb 25, 2007 -> 11:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Look at his other posts. It was CLEARLY sarcastic.

When has chet posted in the fillibuster before? What was the point in bringing up aborting (regarless if it was sarcastic) in this thread? When minors posted here we had no idea if she was serious or not until the same rhetoric was posted over and over by her. That comment was very minors-like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Feb 25, 2007 -> 04:16 PM)
When has chet posted in the fillibuster before? What was the point in bringing up aborting (regarless if it was sarcastic) in this thread? When minors posted here we had no idea if she was serious or not until the same rhetoric was posted over and over by her. That comment was very minors-like.

I know he's posted in the "Dem only" thread before. I presume he posted it to show that there are hypocritical conservatives, too (in response to the op). It strikes me as an overreaction (I think the original post is just a funny story, not meant as any sort of political comment), but it definitely is not serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...