mr_genius Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 pfft, there's no way those psycho teachers would have got my legos. let go my lego, beatch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxy Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(mr_genius @ Mar 30, 2007 -> 04:38 PM) let go my lego, beatch! *rimshot* He'll be here all week folks! Don't forget to tip your waitress. (Okay, I admit, I laughed) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Mar 30, 2007 -> 02:54 PM) I guess I prefer the oppresive and unfair capitialist system, versus penalizing the smart, talented, hardworkers, go getters, etc. There is a big difference between helping your neighbor and having the government just take it anyways. I like the freedom aspect, but I guess that is just me. Nice twist on teaching kids to share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Mar 30, 2007 -> 02:54 PM) I guess I prefer the oppresive and unfair capitialist system, versus penalizing the smart, talented, hardworkers, go getters, etc. There is a big difference between helping your neighbor and having the government just take it anyways. I like the freedom aspect, but I guess that is just me. Again, there's a middle ground between hyper-capitalism and hyper-statism. Criticism of one style of economics does not a hyper-socialist make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 QUOTE(LowerCaseRepublican @ Mar 31, 2007 -> 11:24 AM) Again, there's a middle ground between hyper-capitalism and hyper-statism. Criticism of one style of economics does not a hyper-socialist make. Sure, and if the article had actually stated that is was about sharing, and not an exericize against the uber-evils of captialism, I might believe that for about a second. I don't know how much more clearly the intentions needed to be stated for that to be obvious to all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 1, 2007 Author Share Posted April 1, 2007 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Mar 31, 2007 -> 03:18 PM) Sure, and if the article had actually stated that is was about sharing, and not an exericize against the uber-evils of captialism, I might believe that for about a second. I don't know how much more clearly the intentions needed to be stated for that to be obvious to all. Exactly. This wasn't about sharing. Or teaching social responsibility. Or kindness towards others. It was about displaying the evils of capitalism and power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts