3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Anderson now in center. I hope 9th inning subs won't be the only action he gets all year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Is it true that the Sox over/under is 89 in Vegas? Wow....pretty tempting to take the under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(fathom @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 07:58 PM) Is it true that the Sox over/under is 89 in Vegas? Wow....pretty tempting to take the under. Sounds like a sure thing to me right now. Bad pitching plus tough division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 06:55 PM) obviously our major league team is just trying to boost the morale of our AA team. Maybe we're showcasing every pitcher this evening and feel the need to make them look good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(fathom @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 04:58 PM) Is it true that the Sox over/under is 89 in Vegas? Wow....pretty tempting to take the under. Yes, it is. I would give particular weight to this game played in March in Alabama when making your decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 (edited) Our hope is that they know what happened to Hall, and just don't care about these games. I think I saw on Gameday earlier that PK stuck out on 3 pitches looking earlier. I mean, come on EDIT: NM, looks like they're not keeping up with balls/counts Edited March 30, 2007 by 3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(Brian @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 05:00 PM) Sounds like a sure thing to me right now. Bad pitching plus tough division. less so with the gambler going on the DL. About time something bad happened to that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 :uhoh BA 3 run HR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 06:06 PM) :uhoh BA 3 run HR Well, at least there's one guy on our bench who can hit minor league pitching.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted March 30, 2007 Author Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 08:06 PM) :uhoh BA 3 run HR Uribe had a two run RBI before BA's homer. Now we'll see if the bullpen can actually hold a lead, if Ozzie plays this one out for 'real' or just development. We need a win, big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(The Ginger Kid @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 07:03 PM) less so with the gambler going on the DL. About time something bad happened to that team. Even if Rogers pitches terribly, and possibly endures injury throughout the season, they'll have Andrew Miller available. We don't have an Andrew Miller, unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Alright BA. All started off by the cruise missile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(caulfield12 @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 07:07 PM) Uribe had a two run RBI before BA's homer. Now we'll see if the bullpen can actually hold a lead, if Ozzie plays this one out for 'real' or just development. We need a win, big time. I don't know, I'm kind of hoping for anarchy at this point. It'd just be funnier if we were to battle back against the immortal Barons pitching staff to take the lead, only to have Sisco blow the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Brian Anderson with a statement shot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(The Ginger Kid @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 08:12 PM) Brian Anderson with a statement shot! Trust me the statement means nothing. Ozzie wants to put his speedy no hit guys up ontop just to have visions of what once was in Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Sisco must be in trouble. It's taking MLB Gameday quite a while to update. QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 07:15 PM) Trust me the statement means nothing. Ozzie wants to put his speedy no hit guys up ontop just to have visions of what once was in Florida. If anything, Anderson's HR only reaffirms Guillen's decision to have him as a late inning defensive replacement/pinch hitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 at least Sisco was throwing strikes. He's got no chance to stay on the team if he doesn't throw strikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 11 strikeouts for Barons pitching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Sox win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 08:27 PM) 11 strikeouts for Barons pitching. Must be that line drive swing that they keep talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(fathom @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 07:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If the Sox are going to be crappy this year, I hope they're out of the race by July 28th. I'm not so sure I'm going to be able to watch their home night game on that Saturday. Do you really want the Sox to flip Buehrle for another Gavin Floyd and ex-Sox prospect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 06:44 PM) Do you really want the Sox to flip Buehrle for another Gavin Floyd and ex-Sox prospect? Buehrle for BMac and another pitching prospect? I'm game!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 08:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Even if Rogers pitches terribly, and possibly endures injury throughout the season, they'll have Andrew Miller available. We don't have an Andrew Miller, unfortunately. yeah we just need more minor leaguers who haven't proved jack to sign for millions of dolllars and demanding to be added to the major league roster without throwing a single pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Mar 30, 2007 -> 01:44 AM) Do you really want the Sox to flip Buehrle for another Gavin Floyd and ex-Sox prospect? If it came to it, I hope that the Mets would be knocking pretty hard -- unless they think Pedro is going to come back strong. I'd ask for Milledge straight up, so long as Buehrle was able to replicate his first half of 2006. There should be a lot of teams bidding for Buehrle if he had a decent first half and the Sox tanked. The Cardinals, several AL East teams, Mets, a couple NL Weest teams -- dare I say the Cubs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Mar 29, 2007 -> 07:44 PM) Do you really want the Sox to flip Buehrle for another Gavin Floyd and ex-Sox prospect? You're sounding more and more cynical this offseason. It's strange to read. You should know more than anyone else that's not what I, or many -- including fathom -- would want. I still believe if we're looking to compete within the next five year period we'll need a #1 or #2 to emerge from within our system or via trade. This should be the goal of every deal involving pitching from this point onwards. Don't just deal to deal; or take less to receive your guys (ie Floyd). We have enough back end guys, as it is. Dealing Buehrle midseason really depends upon his statistics and the team's position in the standings. If he's the Buehrle of old, there's a chance he may receive Class A compensation and net us two draft choices. Trading him under such circumstances isn't necessary. However, if he's medicore, then Williams may be better off trading him than taking one Class B draft selection. Even then, I don't expect us to receive crap for him. Yeah, a team probably won't give up a stud prospect; but you can never guess another club's desperation. Off topic, but why did WSI ban you? Was it because of the poll you created about poor offseason moves? Edited March 30, 2007 by Flash Tizzle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.webp.29cc6c9fee0f01ceeb4f722593e5e3ba.webp)
Recommended Posts