Gregory Pratt Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Get the astronaut off of my TV. > Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised. I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankensteiner Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:00 PM) not responsible for the way he pitched but we all know it was a mistake making Jose the number 1. What's the difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 DJ is trying to pick her up. The game is pretty much out of hand, let the man get some love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:00 PM) not responsible for the way he pitched but we all know it was a mistake making Jose the number 1. What was so wrong about putting Count as the #1? QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:00 PM) not responsible for the way he pitched but we all know it was a mistake making Jose the number 1. What was so wrong about putting Count as the #1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jphat007 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 01:04 PM) Get the astronaut off of my TV. > I cannot STAND interviews while I'm watching my baseball. I am not watching to hear some lady speak. I wanna see my freaking baseball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(shawnhillegas @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 07:01 PM) Tomorrows sports page will be pretty funny if both the Sox and the Cubs keep this up. They'll just have the news about the Cubs being sold, and they'll list every single billionaire like Trump, Cuban, etc., and then state how they'll have a 200 million dollar per year payroll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:04 PM) Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised. I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks., The gun on comcast isnt what the judge velocity on. Someone bought the damn thing at the K mart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Too bad the rain isn't coming early.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenryan Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(StrangeSox @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 03:03 PM) What was so wrong about putting Count as the #1? maybe he doesnt warrant being the number 1. Garland after last season should have been number 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 07:04 PM) Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised. I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks., As of right now he's a tick below Jenks. Hey, lookie there! One of our pitchers looked halfway competent against Sizemore! Masset is spotting that low-and-away fastball real well right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jphat007 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 01:04 PM) Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised. I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks., He's at 94-95 according to the gun a the park which MLB uses. That's up near where Jenks usually is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepyWhiteSox Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 SMH at already blaming Ozzie for Contreras' pitching today... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiguy79 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Jose will probably be on the 15 day DL by the end of the week...either that or he will throw a shut out in his second start...I hope option B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iguchi=dank Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 So who were the nerds who took today off work? You guys better be drunk bad by 5. Never been happier to be working during a game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Nixon 3 for 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Is it me, or is it weird to anyone else that we could only get an astronaut to throw out the first pitch on opening day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawnhillegas Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 The gun is reading Sabathia between 88-91, not to mention that Masset probably has to throw 3-4 innings here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 12:04 PM) Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised. I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks., It's not like Jenks has been throwing 99+ this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:06 PM) maybe he doesnt warrant being the number 1. Garland after last season should have been number 1. Garland a staff ace? Don't make me laugh. He's a very solid #2 or #3, but not a #1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:06 PM) maybe he doesnt warrant being the number 1. Garland after last season should have been number 1. Agreed, but in the end it doesn't mattered, you're just delaying him getting lit up by a day or two (well you never know but still) Edited April 2, 2007 by 3 BeWareTheNewSox 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 So...How about those playoff bound Bulls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:07 PM) So...How about those playoff bound Bulls? First round and out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 07:06 PM) As of right now he's a tick below Jenks. Hey, lookie there! One of our pitchers looked halfway competent against Sizemore! Masset is spotting that low-and-away fastball real well right now. He's throwing better this inning. His fastball is crisper. He still looks like he gives away his slider right away. My hope for him is to become a set-up man in the next few years. He's slimmer than I thought he'd be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 haha, its double posting all over atleast the game thread is entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts