Jump to content

Opening Day: White Sox vs. Indians, 4/2/07 (L)


Steve9347

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 615
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:00 PM)
not responsible for the way he pitched but we all know it was a mistake making Jose the number 1.

 

What was so wrong about putting Count as the #1?

 

 

QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:00 PM)
not responsible for the way he pitched but we all know it was a mistake making Jose the number 1.

 

What was so wrong about putting Count as the #1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 01:04 PM)
Get the astronaut off of my TV. >:(

 

I cannot STAND interviews while I'm watching my baseball. I am not watching to hear some lady speak. I wanna see my freaking baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(shawnhillegas @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 07:01 PM)
Tomorrows sports page will be pretty funny if both the Sox and the Cubs keep this up.

 

They'll just have the news about the Cubs being sold, and they'll list every single billionaire like Trump, Cuban, etc., and then state how they'll have a 200 million dollar per year payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:04 PM)
Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised.

 

I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks.,

 

 

The gun on comcast isnt what the judge velocity on. Someone bought the damn thing at the K mart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(StrangeSox @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 03:03 PM)
What was so wrong about putting Count as the #1?

 

 

maybe he doesnt warrant being the number 1.

 

 

Garland after last season should have been number 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 07:04 PM)
Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised.

 

I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks.,

 

As of right now he's a tick below Jenks.

 

Hey, lookie there! One of our pitchers looked halfway competent against Sizemore!

 

Masset is spotting that low-and-away fastball real well right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 01:04 PM)
Massett's velocity is nowhere near advertised.

 

I don't see someone as a "tick" below Jenks.,

 

He's at 94-95 according to the gun a the park which MLB uses. That's up near where Jenks usually is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(zenryan @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 02:06 PM)
maybe he doesnt warrant being the number 1.

Garland after last season should have been number 1.

 

Agreed, but in the end it doesn't mattered, you're just delaying him getting lit up by a day or two (well you never know but still)

Edited by 3 BeWareTheNewSox 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Apr 2, 2007 -> 07:06 PM)
As of right now he's a tick below Jenks.

 

Hey, lookie there! One of our pitchers looked halfway competent against Sizemore!

 

Masset is spotting that low-and-away fastball real well right now.

 

He's throwing better this inning. His fastball is crisper. He still looks like he gives away his slider right away. My hope for him is to become a set-up man in the next few years. He's slimmer than I thought he'd be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...