Jump to content

Prosecutors drop charges in Duke case


Controlled Chaos

Recommended Posts

Prosecutors drop charges in Duke case

By AARON BEARD, Associated Press Writer

7 minutes ago

 

 

 

RALEIGH, N.C. - Prosecutors dropped all charges Wednesday against the three Duke lacrosse players accused of sexually assaulting a stripper at a party, saying the athletes were innocent victims of a "tragic rush to accuse" by an overreaching district attorney.

 

 

"There were many points in the case where caution would have served justice better than bravado," North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper said in a damning assessment of Durham County District Mike Nifong's handling of the sensational case.

 

Cooper, who took over the case in January after Nifong was charged with ethics violations that could get him disbarred, said his own investigation "led us to the conclusion that no attack occurred."

 

"I think a lot of people owe a lot of apologies to a lot of people," Cooper said. "I think those people ought to consider doing that."

 

Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans were indicted last spring on charges of rape, kidnapping and sexual offense after the woman told police she was assaulted in the bathroom at an off-campus house during a team party where she had been hired to perform.

 

The allegations at first outraged the city, a faded tobacco capital with a long history of tension between its large working-class black population and Duke, an elite private school where most of the students, including the three lacrosse players, are white. The woman is black and attended nearby North Carolina Central University.

 

But that anger largely shifted to Nifong as his evidence against the three fell apart and questions surfaced about the accuser.

 

The attorney general said Wednesday that the eyewitness identification procedures were unreliable, no DNA supported the woman's story, no other witness corroborated it, and the woman contradicted herself.

 

"Based on the significant inconsistencies between the evidence and the various accounts given by the accusing witness, we believe these three individuals are innocent of these charges," Cooper said.

 

He said the charges resulted from a "tragic rush to accuse and a failure to verify serious allegations."

 

However, Cooper said no charges will be brought against the accuser, saying she "may actually believe" the many different versions of the stories she has told. "We believe it is in the best interest of justice not to bring charges," he said.

 

Cooper called for the passage of a state law that would allow the North Carolina Supreme Court to remove a prosecutor "who needs to step away from a case where justice demands."

 

"This case shows the enormous consequences of overreaching by a prosecutor," he said.

 

Nifong, who was meeting with his attorney Wednesday in Winston-Salem, has been charged by the state bar with ethics violations connected to his handling of the case and could face disbarment.

 

"Since he recused himself in January and turned the case over to the attorney general's office, he has had no involvement in the investigation," said David Freedman, Nifong's lawyer, speaking before the announcement. "At the time he turned the case over — and now — he has had complete confidence in the attorney general's office to make the appropriate decision."

 

The 28-year-old woman initially said she was gang-raped and beaten by three white men at the March 13, 2006, party thrown by Duke's highly ranked lacrosse team.

 

The three players insisted the accusations were "fantastic lies." Another dancer who had been with the woman also questioned if she had been raped, called the allegations "a crock" and said the woman seemed drunk when she tried to drive her home that night. Seligmann also produced ATM receipts, cell phone records and other evidence suggesting he was somewhere else at the time.

 

In the end, it appeared the case was based only on the testimony of the accuser, whom defense attorneys said had told wildly different versions of the alleged assault.

 

Nifong's recusal in January put the players' fate in the hands of the North Carolina attorney general, who promised "a fresh and thorough review of the facts."

 

The North Carolina State Bar charged Nifong with making misleading and inflammatory comments about the athletes under suspicion. It later added more serious offenses of withholding evidence from defense attorneys and lying to the court and bar investigators. He stands trial on those charges in June.

 

Nifong had accused the team of refusing to cooperate, calling them "a bunch of hooligans," and promised DNA evidence would finger the guilty.

 

His case started to erode when no DNA evidence tied any player to the accuser.

 

Defense attorneys also attacked a key photo lineup that used only pictures of lacrosse players, and they noted the accuser had claimed a decade earlier that she had been gang-raped but it never led to an arrest. A series of tests Nifong ordered from a private lab found genetic material from several men on the accuser's underwear and body, but none from any member of the Duke lacrosse team, they said.

 

Duke temporarily suspended Seligmann, 21, of Essex Fells, N.J., and Finnerty, 20, of Garden City, N.Y., in the wake of their arrest. Both were invited to return to campus but neither accepted.

 

Evans, 24, of Bethesda, Md., graduated the day before he was indicted.

 

John Danowski, the former coach at Hofstra who took over the Duke program last summer, has also said that both are welcome to continue playing lacrosse with the Blue Devils. On Wednesday, he moved the team's afternoon practice back so his players could attend a planned defense news conference with their former teammates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 11, 2007 -> 02:58 PM)
So, at this point I think we can all unite behind supporting the lawsuit those kids are going to bring against that D.A., and the other attempts to have him disbarred and so forth.

Absolutely. Nifong acted in a despicable manner, and he needs to suffer some consequences. He should, without question, be disbarred at the very minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cross posted

 

The players deserve an apology. They will also be successful in a settlement that will line their pockets. Fines are the main way we keep score in America.

 

I also hope that other kids realize that these kids put themselves into a position where they could be accused and many people would not believe them. Hiring strippers isn't exactly an activity that will endear them to most of America. Put yourself into a bad situation and bad things can happen.

 

There are a lot of lessons here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think ordering a stripper can even hold a candle to making them in any way responsible for what that stripper and DA did to them. This is what these kids are gonna be remembered for, for the rest of their lives. They will always be linked to rape allegations. The stripper and DA should be in jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(DrunkBomber @ Apr 12, 2007 -> 12:42 PM)
I dont think ordering a stripper can even hold a candle to making them in any way responsible for what that stripper and DA did to them. This is what these kids are gonna be remembered for, for the rest of their lives. They will always be linked to rape allegations. The stripper and DA should be in jail.

 

The biggest curse is the lingering thoughts of victims who may not come forward and prosecutors that may not prosecute. I am more inclined to throw the book at the stripper and possibly taking a more cautious look at the DA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Texsox @ Apr 12, 2007 -> 12:49 PM)
The biggest curse is the lingering thoughts of victims who may not come forward and prosecutors that may not prosecute. I am more inclined to throw the book at the stripper and possibly taking a more cautious look at the DA.

 

Well that's what happens when you put the victim on trial instead of the defendants. Its why rape cases are the most underreported major crime category, and also the least successful one at trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(LosMediasBlancas @ Apr 12, 2007 -> 01:02 PM)
What exactly did the stripper hope to gain by making these allegations?

Im sure she viewed them all as rich preppy kids, which they relatively were and she figured shed be able to sue them afterwards.

 

Tex, I see your point though. There is a dangerously fine line on how to handle things like this and its sad that the actions of these people may make others think twice about reporting a crime that really did happen. This is just a terrible situation. Since most of thee kids had money to begin with Im sure they would trade this ever happening instead of whatever lawsuit they get out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Apr 12, 2007 -> 01:07 PM)
Well that's what happens when you put the victim on trial instead of the defendants. Its why rape cases are the most underreported major crime category, and also the least successful one at trial.

 

This gets confusing, I assume we are agreeing. The problem is the "victim" tunred out to not be and the defendents turned out to be victims. So if the stripper (victim) had been put on trial earlier, much of this may have been spared from the headlines.

 

I have no doubt that the politics of getting re-elected played a role, and that really pisses me off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...