ShoeLessRob Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Nice play by Paul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg The Bull Luzinski Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(TheBigHurt @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:51 PM) Erstad has already gotten more hits than I can remember Brian getting all year Personally, I have tried to block out all of Brian Anderson's at-bats from last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Erstad's offense 2007 = Anderson's offense 2006 Actually, Erstad is worse. Anderson has better plate patience and hits for more power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 05:49 PM) In a word, yes. Though not completely. Erstad may yet hit this year. Anderson never hit last year. Brian Anderson in: AVG OBP SLG OPS July .313 .328 .469 .797 August .296 .367 .437 .804 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg The Bull Luzinski Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:52 PM) Brian Anderson in: AVG OBP SLG OPS July .313 .328 .469 .797 August .296 .367 .437 .804 That's right, he did have that 2 month hot streak. Too bad the season is six months long. As I said, I block out much of BA's offense from last year. Edited April 24, 2007 by Greg The Bull Luzinski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:52 PM) Brian Anderson in: AVG OBP SLG OPS July .313 .328 .469 .797 August .296 .367 .437 .804 What a crock. Post September, April, May and June. LET'S GO WHITE SOX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 05:55 PM) That's right, he did have that 2 month hot streak. Too bad the season is six months long. As I said, I bloack out much of BA's offense from last year. There's a difference between saying that you block out much of BA's offense last year, which even I'll grant was bad, and saying that he never started to hit, which was simply untrue. He did start to hit, just not consistently across the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:55 PM) What a crock. Post September, April, May and June. LET'S GO WHITE SOX I'm just wondering, but do you hate Anderson because other people like him, or did he like kick your mother in the nuts or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capn12 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Holy crap, a PK hit!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 PK with a base knock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 This offense makes it seem so difficult to hit the ball hard consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What a crock. Post September, April, May and June. LET'S GO WHITE SOX RTFP "Anderson never hit last year." He hit in August and July. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:55 PM) What a crock. Post September, April, May and June. LET'S GO WHITE SOX Why is it a crock. Someone said Anderson NEVER hit last year. Balta should two months where he did. Seems clear to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg The Bull Luzinski Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:56 PM) There's a difference between saying that you block out much of BA's offense last year, which even I'll grant was bad, and saying that he never started to hit, which was simply untrue. He did start to hit, just not consistently across the season. It sure did seem like he never hit anything. Though I would say 4 month of no hitting > 2 months of no hitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46bearsd Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 did the gun just say 103 mph? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 05:57 PM) It sure did seem like he never hit anything. Though I would say 4 month of no hitting > 2 months of no hitting. Totally granted. I'd just say that Erstad's 6 years of pretty poor hitting should come into the discussion at some point as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It sure did seem like he never hit anything. Though I would say 4 month of no hitting > 2 months of no hitting. I, and many others would say there are two gregs in this thread full of it. Only a matter of time before greg775 comes in here and in typical fashion kissing up the Royals making it a grand total of 3. Edited April 24, 2007 by santo=dorf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 Dye K's on the 3-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 That's bad luck? WTF are you talking about Hawk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
46bearsd Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 these royals announces are much worse than hawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg The Bull Luzinski Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:59 PM) Totally granted. I'd just say that Erstad's 6 years of pretty poor hitting should come into the discussion at some point as well. To be truthful, I am not understand the Anderson love v. Erstad hate. They both have positive and negatives. Yet I think people here forget how miserable BA looked at the plate at times last year and see Anderson replacing Erstad as a solution. I just do not think that is realistic. If we get .260 out of CF, most of us will be happy unless it is Ken Griffey Jr. Edited April 24, 2007 by Greg The Bull Luzinski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Heads22 @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:56 PM) I'm just wondering, but do you hate Anderson because other people like him, or did he like kick your mother in the nuts or something? I don't hate Brian Anderson. I just think he's a great example of ego when it isn't called for, poor hitting and poor approach to hitting. It is obnoxious to see people gush about him. Just watching him at the plate makes it clear he has no clue what he's doing. It was clear last year, all year, and it's continued. But that's Ozzie's fault!!!!!111111111111111 I do like the cute attempt to insinuate that my mother has nuts. Your clever lulz!!111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:59 PM) Totally granted. I'd just say that Erstad's 6 years of pretty poor hitting should come into the discussion at some point as well. Anderson also did not have an OPS below .554 during any month last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 07:59 PM) I, and many others would say there are two gregs in this thread full of it. Only a matter of time before greg775 comes in here and in typical fashion kissing up the Royals making it a grand total of 3. I'm full of it because I think BA's terrible? Give me a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 24, 2007 Share Posted April 24, 2007 QUOTE(Greg The Bull Luzinski @ Apr 23, 2007 -> 06:02 PM) To be truthful, I am not understand the Anderson love v. Erstad hate. They both have positive and negatives. Yet I think people here forget how miserable BA looked at the plate at times last year and see Anderson as a solution. I just do not think that is realistic. If we get .260 out of CF, most of us will be happy unless it is Ken Griffey Jr. I would agree with that...if I thought we were also getting the best defense out of the position we could. But IMO, that's also not Erstad. Heck, I'd easily prefer Terrero to Erstad in terms of getting this much playing time right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts