Soxy Posted May 4, 2007 Share Posted May 4, 2007 Link Good for them. Brazil bypasses patent on U.S. AIDS drug By VIVIAN SEQUERA, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 14 minutes ago BRASILIA, Brazil - President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took steps Friday to let Brazil buy an inexpensive generic version of an AIDS drug made by Merck & Co. despite the U.S. drug company's patent. Silva issued a "compulsory license" that would bypass Merck's patent on the AIDS drug efavirenz, a day after the Brazilian government rejected Merck's offer to sell the drug at a 30 percent discount, or $1.10 per pill, down from $1.57. The country was seeking to purchase the drug at 65 cents a pill, the same price Thailand pays. It was the first time Brazil has bypassed a patent, but Silva said Brazil would consider doing so again on any drug sold at unfair prices. "Between our business and our health, we are going to take care of our health," he said after signing the decree. Amy Rose, a spokeswoman for Whitehouse Station, N.J.-based Merck, said earlier that the company would be "profoundly disappointed if Brazil goes ahead with a compulsory license." "As the world's 12th largest economy, Brazil has a greater capacity to pay for HIV medicines than countries that are poorer or harder hit by the disease," Merck said in a statement after Silva's announcement. A compulsory license is a legal mechanism that allows a country to manufacture or buy generic versions of patented drugs while paying the patent holder only a small royalty. Brazilian law and rules established under the World Trade Organization allow compulsory licenses in a health emergency or if the pharmaceutical industry uses abusive pricing. After Thailand moved to override patents on three anti-AIDS drugs, including those made by Abbott Laboratories and Merck, the United States placed Thailand on a list of copyright violators. In Thailand's capital of Bangkok, AIDS activists rallied outside the U.S. Embassy on Thursday to protest that decision, calling the Thai government's move to slash the cost of pricey U.S.-made AIDS drugs a "lifesaver." The president of the U.S.-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Michael Weinstein, called Brazil's action a "victory," saying in a statement, "We salute the courage of countries such as Brazil, Thailand and Mexico who are fighting to ensure drug access for AIDS patients the world over. "Drug companies will go down in defeat every time they place themselves in the way of justice for AIDS patients," he said. But the U.S.-Brazil Business Council said the decision was a "major step backward" in intellectual property law and warned it could harm development. "Brazil is working to attract investment in innovative industries ... and this move will likely cause investments to go elsewhere," the council said in a statement. Although Brazil had threatened to bypass drug patents in the past, the country had always reached a last-minute agreement with drug manufacturers. Brazil provides free AIDS drugs to anyone who needs them and manufactures generic versions of several drugs that were in production before Brazil enacted an intellectual property law in 1997 to join the WTO. But as newer drugs have emerged, costs ballooned and health officials warned that without deep discounts, they would be forced to issue compulsory licenses. Efavirenz is used by 75,000 of the 180,000 Brazilians who receive free AIDS drugs from the government. The drug currently costs about the government about $580 per patient per year. "The price is 136 percent higher than this lab (Merck) offers to Thailand," Health Minister Jose Gomes Temporao said, and the price "threatened the viability of the anti-AIDS program." The Health Ministry says a generic version of efavirenz would save the government some $240 million between now and 2012, when Merck's patent expires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted May 4, 2007 Share Posted May 4, 2007 By what standard is that sold at an 'unfair price'? Do they know how much they spent developing that drug? Or how many other drugs the profits from that one drug fund the research for? If that was your drug patent that they just usurpt, would you be happy? Maybe if the governemnt there bought a few less jets they could afford the drug for their people? I agree that it makes no sense for them to sell the drug to country a for $1 ea and to country b for $1.50 ea, to to simply liberate it is just one step further to socialism. Kinda like Hugo. i hear he is targeting banks next, sine he is thru with confiscating the oil fields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Government sanctioned theft. I wonder how Brazil would react if we just went in and took over their farm fields because we needed the food to feed our people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 5, 2007 Share Posted May 5, 2007 Why does Thailand get to pay a lesser amount though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted May 6, 2007 Share Posted May 6, 2007 QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ May 4, 2007 -> 03:38 PM) By what standard is that sold at an 'unfair price'? Based on the lowest price that it sells for, in this case Thailand. I see both sides of this argument. This is a lifesaving drug that the company has already offered at a lower price to someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts