Texsox Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ May 21, 2007 -> 07:10 AM) If you put the two most hypocritcal candidates out there for each party, and the most polarizing in regards to common party lines, I have no doubt you will give a third party a golden chance to rush in a sieze the middle. I've been thinking Edwards was the front runner all along, Obama and Hillary will bash each others brains out and have high negative energy. In other words Dem voters will say I'm for Obama and if he doesn't win, anyone but Hillary. and I'm for Clinton and if she doesn't win, anyone but Obama Guess who "anybody" is? Edwards. Everyone's second choice, Or at least nobody's last choice. The GOP radio network has been simultaneously promoting Hillary as the front runner and tearing her down. Great strategy. She is the easiest for the GOP to beat. The ghosts of her husband and all that crap are enough to keep a lot of Dem faithful (including me) from voting for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ May 24, 2007 -> 11:12 PM) Because he's the only one who isn't making a complete arse of himself on the war funding. Huh? How about the non-Senators running - Romney, Richardson, Giuliani... and how about the few Senators with some balls? Like Kucinich (who, again, while not electable, is at least principled). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ May 25, 2007 -> 06:07 AM) He hasn't had a voting record to get beatdown with since he left the Senate. True, but when he makes comments downplaying a War on Terror, he sounds naive/idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ May 25, 2007 -> 05:58 PM) Huh? How about the non-Senators running - Romney, Richardson, Giuliani... and how about the few Senators with some balls? Like Kucinich (who, again, while not electable, is at least principled). Kucinich is a Congressman, but you're otherwise right. Richardson is IMHO the only person with real foreign policy experience worth having in this race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipWellsFan Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ May 22, 2007 -> 08:38 AM) Tell you what. Since that is 2 on 1, if you give me 2-to-1 odds, I'd take that bet on Edwards. I think I'd have to take that bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 QUOTE(KipWellsFan @ May 28, 2007 -> 12:13 AM) I think I'd have to take that bet. What shall we wager? Do a sig bet maybe? Though I don't see how the odds would work there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts