whitesoxfan101 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Nice effort guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Any other organization would have gotten rid of Walker a long time ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo's Drinker Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 just let the kids play at this point, its obvious the organization could care less about end result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 robble robble robble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox72 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 (edited) Pathetic. A special thanks to Ozzie for making sure he at least put the bat in his best hitters hands in a game we couldn't muster s*** up. Great managing sending Cintron up to pinch hit. Edited June 12, 2007 by chisox72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(whitesoxfan101 @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:44 PM) Nice effort guys. Nice. You finally beat me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 I legitimately wouldn't be surprised if we get no hit by Hamels tomorrow. Wow is that sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Rick Sutcliffe was talking about Vazquez tipping his pitches tonight, and he's right. Could be a big reason why he always gets lit up the 3rd time through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 We play like doggy poo poo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 5 hits, no runs against a team that gave up 17 runs yesterday including 11 runs by the pen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:50 PM) 5 hits, no runs against a team that gave up 17 runs yesterday including 11 runs by the pen. They were due to shut somebody down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Side Fireworks Man Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:50 PM) I didn't watch the whole game, but I didn't see Vaz get "lit up" any time during this game.... Vazquez pitched pretty well tonight but once again the Sox offense, particularly the guys who were expected to carry the team, did absolutely nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:50 PM) I didn't watch the whole game, but I didn't see Vaz get "lit up" any time during this game.... Im talking about in the past, mainly last season. QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:50 PM) 5 hits, no runs against a team that gave up 17 runs yesterday including 11 runs by the pen. Against Kansas City no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:48 PM) Rick Sutcliffe was talking about Vazquez tipping his pitches tonight, and he's right. Could be a big reason why he always gets lit up the 3rd time through. No sutcliffe was talking about Vazquez doing something with his head/balance point in relation to his record. I believe his thesis was that Vazquez' numbers were good, but he didn't win a lot of games because of his head/balance point issue. Sut made no mention of run support, because the only stat that matters is W, and clearly Vazquez isn't good at getting his offense to score more runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I said it all through the gamethread yesterday: this is a bad team. We will be shut down most of the time and every once in a while light it up but that's it. Any pitcher that gets lit up by this offense should be ashamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 PFB with the lets protect Greg crap. We are hitting .222 in June so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:54 PM) No sutcliffe was talking about Vazquez doing something with his head/balance point in relation to his record. I believe his thesis was that Vazquez' numbers were good, but he didn't win a lot of games because of his head/balance point issue. Sut made no mention of run support, because the only stat that matters is W, and clearly Vazquez isn't good at getting his offense to score more runs. He was talking about how when JV throws to the first base side of home plate he kind of tips his head that way, and when he throws to the other side of the plate he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSGuy406 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Jun 12, 2007 -> 01:50 AM) 5 hits, no runs against a team that gave up 17 runs yesterday including 11 runs by the pen. Thome out of the lineup, Pods, Erstad and Crede all injured. Perfect storm. What else can you do but tip your cap to the guy with the 6.00 ERA, Adam Eaton. Boy, don't look at the stat sheet, he's going to be a 25 game winner this year. Edited June 12, 2007 by CWSGuy406 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:54 PM) No sutcliffe was talking about Vazquez doing something with his head/balance point in relation to his record. I believe his thesis was that Vazquez' numbers were good, but he didn't win a lot of games because of his head/balance point issue. Sut made no mention of run support, because the only stat that matters is W, and clearly Vazquez isn't good at getting his offense to score more runs. Did you even watch the game? The whole point of Sutcliffe's analysis of Vazquez is, He rocks his head back when he's coming inside and keeps it straight if he's going outside. His thesis was that because of this he gets hit hard after the third time around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 According to PFB, its just a fluke that they are not hitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santo=dorf Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(South Side Fireworks Man @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 08:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Vazquez pitched pretty well tonight but once again the Sox offense, particularly the guys who were expected to carry the team, did absolutely nothing. Thome didn't even get on base tonight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(santo=dorf @ Jun 12, 2007 -> 02:00 AM) Thome didn't even get on base tonight! Thome should have been brought in when Uribe had two guys on in the 6th, I believe. You have to make sure you use your best weapon in a situation where he can do damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnB Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 sox games are just like background noise to me now, this is terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 11, 2007 -> 09:02 PM) Thome should have been brought in when Uribe had two guys on in the 6th, I believe. You have to make sure you use your best weapon in a situation where he can do damage. The only problem with that was they would have went to Zagurski, and we know how Thome does against lefties. I had no problem with saving him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 QUOTE(WhiteSoxfan1986 @ Jun 12, 2007 -> 02:04 AM) The only problem with that was they would have went to Zagurski, and we know how Thome does against lefties. I had no problem with saving him. I highly doubt they would have pulled Eaton in the 6th inning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts