GreatScott82 Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 09:02 PM) I thought it was 7th series in a row. 7th series in a row, 9th series in a row who gives a crap. This team stinx and i think we all know it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 09:04 PM) Why do you waste your time following this s***ty team..? I'm sure there's something better you could be doing with your precious time. Hey, look at the bright side. It gives something for people to (negatively) obsess over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(GreatScott82 @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:04 PM) 7th series in a row, 9th series in a row who gives a crap. This team stinx and i think we all know it! Wait until Pods gets back. The Knights never lose when he's in the line-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briguy27 Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(briguy27 @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 02:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> its going to be sad that big jon is going to only give up 1-3 runs in 7 innings, and get a L Wow, I can just see the future. Except for the L part, I was exactly right. I don't know if I want us to lose the series to the Scrubbies so the fire sale takes place, or to win it for bragging rights. Edited June 20, 2007 by briguy27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShoeLessRob Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 2007: The year Mark Buehrle threw a no hitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:05 PM) Hey, look at the bright side. It gives something for people to (negatively) obsess over. Isn't that kind of "therapy" covered under insurance..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briguy27 Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 On mlbtradeumors.com, they wonder if the Sox will break their 3 year contract rule with pitchers, with Buehrle. They say Buehrle will cost them 5 years, $75 million. Forget about Mark wearing a White Sock uniform in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(TheOcho @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:05 PM) 2007: The year Mark Buehrle threw a no hitter. 2010 looking back on 2007: The year Williams received outstanding packages for players traded during the deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...-home-headlines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandy125 Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 03:50 PM) Listen online. I'm not watching it either yet I was able to tell it was a solid hit, not to mention the guy is having a great day at the plate. Common sense. Not always an option. For example, me, that is blocked even though I have GameDay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(vandy125 @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:18 PM) Not always an option. For example, me, that is blocked even though I have GameDay. The score has a free feed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(vandy125 @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:18 PM) Not always an option. For example, me, that is blocked even though I have GameDay. Really? I have MLB.tv and it blacks out the Sox game TV feed but gameday audio always works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted June 20, 2007 Share Posted June 20, 2007 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:24 PM) The score has a free feed. I remember from last summer that they couldn't broadcast games online. It switched over to reruns. Has that changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagotony06 Posted June 20, 2007 Author Share Posted June 20, 2007 Just got back from the game. Garland looked good. Uribe is a f***ing piece of s***. The sooner we get rid of this clown the better. He is useless. If we are gonna have a firesale, I pray that he is included because he is a BUM!!! DYE is a BUM!!! Garland gives up 3 hits, and loses the game. UNREAL!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted June 21, 2007 Share Posted June 21, 2007 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 05:24 PM) The score has a free feed. No. MLB refuses to allow free radio broadcasts of its games over the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 21, 2007 Share Posted June 21, 2007 Uribe does stink. Where we gonna get a good shortstop. Another guy we suddenly need on our wish list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max power Posted June 21, 2007 Share Posted June 21, 2007 We need everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandy125 Posted June 21, 2007 Share Posted June 21, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(Brian @ Jun 20, 2007 -> 04:39 PM) Really? I have MLB.tv and it blacks out the Sox game TV feed but gameday audio always works. It is more of a matter on what sites are blocked where I am at as opposed to the actual gameday audio. That type of stuff is blocked. So, even if I could find a web site that did stream it, I doubt that it would work. I also am a bit far away to pick up the AM signal. It's just a situation that there is no way to listen to live commentary unless I take the day off. Some people do not have access to that. Edited June 21, 2007 by vandy125 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts