Jump to content

White Sox vs. Cubs, 6/23/07 (L)


Heads22

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 23, 2007 -> 02:58 PM)
Your attitude will turn upwards immediately if Jacque Jones remains on the South Side.

 

What an absolutely horrendous rumor.

:hawk:

 

Dye and Haeger for Billingsley and Ethier.

 

That was easy enough.

 

Next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 23, 2007 -> 07:58 PM)
Your attitude will turn upwards immediately if Jacque Jones remains on the South Side.

 

What an absolutely horrendous rumor.

 

I think there's a great chance it happens. I could see us trading someone like Haeger for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody just tried telling me over AIM that Jenks brought us a World Series in 2004. I said that it was 2005, and he said "Well my bad, they just call it 2005 b/c half the season is played then." :chair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(briguy27 @ Jun 23, 2007 -> 03:02 PM)
Somebody just tried telling me over AIM that Jenks brought us a World Series in 2004. I said that it was 2005, and he said "Well my bad, they just call it 2005 b/c half the season is played then." :chair

 

 

fascinating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 23, 2007 -> 03:02 PM)
Now figure out a scenario involving Mark Buehrle.

 

There better be the next Liriano somewhere in it. :P

 

 

Mark Buehrle to the Dodgers for Kershaw, Hu and Broxton.

 

This isn't very hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fathom @ Jun 23, 2007 -> 03:01 PM)
I think there's a great chance it happens. I could see us trading someone like Haeger for him.

What purpose does it serve? It's just completely irrelevant to our future. If people consider it a short term solution, which was essentially the term used in the rumor thread, I have to ask this -- what short term future does this team possess? We're not going to compete, regardless. Let Sweeney play. Don't delay his development.

 

If anything, trade for Murton; someone not on the downside of their career. It'd make more sense with the lefthanders in the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jun 23, 2007 -> 08:07 PM)
What purpose does it serve? It's just completely irrelevant to our future. If people consider it a short term solution, which was essentially the term used in the rumor thread, I have to ask this -- what short term future does this team possess? We're not going to compete, regardless. Let Sweeney play. Don't delay his development.

 

If anything, trade for Murton; someone not on the downside of their career. It'd make more sense with the lefthanders in the division.

 

More because I hate the Cubs, and if we're going to suck, I don't want them to make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...