SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(watchtower41 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:45 AM) Well, at least they got decent ratings for this morning. Some things never change. I still havent forgave them for the "Griffey trade" bs if you're talking about the April Fools joke, yeah, that was ridiculous. Their credability would be zero if this doesn't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(SoxFan562004 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 08:42 AM) uh-oh, can't hear it at work, how are they packpedaling? Are they just saying "sources" or the sides are only talking? The score may be backpedaling, but like I pointed out, the Sun-Times has gotten into the game and is calling it "Near" as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klaus kinski Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:47 AM) The score may be backpedaling, but like I pointed out, the Sun-Times has gotten into the game and is calling it "Near" as well. Near and "Done" are miles apart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 Nothing on the Trib site yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 suprised Levine and AM 1000 aren't weighing in on this. I assume he's checking his sources before he either totally squashes it or at least weighs in with his opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(SoxPride56 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:46 AM) http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6967378 Well, this says that sorces are telling FoxSports he could sign. Unless his hand is broken, he can sign. Thank you Fox Sports for that breaking news. :rolleyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(SoxPride56 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:46 AM) http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6967378 Well, this says that sorces are telling FoxSports he could sign. Does Contrearas have no-trade protection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(klaus kinski @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 08:48 AM) Near and "Done" are miles apart True, but "off the trading block" is a quite specific statement and they're def. giving us that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:21 AM) I really don't like the way Mulligan and Hanley are talking right now. They continue to repeat themselves saying it's not quite a done deal and that "sources" (ick) are telling them it's close/done. I could see KW dealing him away in the next few hours and totally killing this buzz the Score has sent through the fanbase. I don't believe a source exists. I think they want their listeners to believe they are on top of the story, but who is breaking this ? Jesse Rogers ? Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 03:47 PM) 4/$50M....? Apparently it's "let's get high before we go on the air day" at the Score. If Mark signs this deal, he's stupid. I would suspect the union would beat his ass as well. That's exactly why I keep saying this is bulls***. I guess we'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Steff @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:49 AM) Unless his hand is broken, he can sign. Thank you Fox Sports for that breaking news. :rolleyes. lol, well Steff, I'd get ready for a lot of quality lines like this in the next hour or so since outlets don't want to be out-scooped but also leave them wiggle room if this is all B.S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg The Bull Luzinski Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(SoxPride56 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:46 AM) http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6967378 Well, this says that sorces are telling FoxSports he could sign. The comments below this article would suggest our recently banned member "Omar Manaya" is posting as FoxSports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Jenks Heat @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:49 AM) Does Contrearas have no-trade protection? i'm sure this will be answered by the time it's posted, but I think it goes through the '07 season only Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 If this happens. wow. I mean what a sweat deal. If the sox are still planning on trading him. The asking price for him just went through the roof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.J. Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 This is certainly good news, but if the actual numbers are 4yrs/$50m I'll eat my hat. This simply can not be. It's a very optimistic scenario from a radio station that's filled with premature reports, just last week reporting that Scott Linebrink was involved in that Barrett trade. I'd expect $6-8M would have to be tacked on to this to even make it realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:51 AM) If this happens. wow. I mean what a sweat deal. If the sox are still planning on trading him. The asking price for him just went through the roof. i imagine if this deal is true, then MB and his agents put in either a strict no-trade clause or a ridiculously limited one, ie the Cardinals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whtsox13 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 A firend of mine said he heard it was 5 yrs/$85 mil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitlesswonder Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:50 AM) True, but "off the trading block" is a quite specific statement and they're def. giving us that. Both fathom and Crasnick from ESPN have heard that Buehrle is not off the market. So I think right now, nothing has changed. The media stories could still just be a move to drive up Buehrle's trade value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(whtsox13 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:53 AM) A firend of mine said he heard it was 5 yrs/$85 mil. I guess that would make more sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(whtsox13 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:53 AM) A firend of mine said he heard it was 5 yrs/$85 mil. I highly doubt that those numbers are accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 ESPN has something on their Insider page, but I can't get to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Beast Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:54 AM) ESPN has something on their Insider page, but I can't get to it. Can anyone get to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:50 AM) That's exactly why I keep saying this is bulls***. I guess we'll see. The $$'s are so idiotic I'm ashamed to even ask anyone if it's true.. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(whtsox13 @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 09:53 AM) A firend of mine said he heard it was 5 yrs/$85 mil. Is your friend Kenny Williams? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 QUOTE(Beastly @ Jun 27, 2007 -> 10:55 AM) Can anyone get to it? it's probably the report that other GMs have told their scouts to keep scouting the Sox and ignore the extension talk. A couple pages ago someone posted that, I think it was ESPN reporters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts