Jump to content

Films Thread


Chisoxfn

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (DBAHO @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 09:39 AM)
I also watched 21 for about the 3rd time in the past month last night.

 

Good film I thought with an absolute class soundtrack (Time to Pretend from MGMT and Young Folks from Peter Bjorn and John for instance).

 

Jim Sturgess reminds me of a taller version of myself also (for some reason).

I thought it was entertaining, if nothing else. The best component of the film, aside from the soundtrack, is how Fishburn's character is at risk of losing his job due to the advancement of face recognition technology within casinos. It gave this sense of urgency for him to prove himself, and for all the players (including that douche Spacey, who I f***ing hate as an actor) to avade detection while collecting their money.

 

Here's another tune from the soundtrack:

 

Edited by Flash Tizzle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 02:41 PM)
I thought it was entertaining, if nothing else. The best component of the film, aside from the soundtrack, is how Fishburn's character is at risk of losing his job due to the advancement of face recognition technology within casinos. It gave this sense of urgency for him to prove himself, and for all the players (including that douche Spacey, who I f***ing hate as an actor) to avade detection while collecting their money.

 

Here's another tune from the soundtrack:

 

 

Don't like great actors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (DBAHO @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 09:39 AM)
I also watched 21 for about the 3rd time in the past month last night.

 

Good film I thought with an absolute class soundtrack (Time to Pretend from MGMT and Young Folks from Peter Bjorn and John for instance).

 

Jim Sturgess reminds me of a taller version of myself also (for some reason).

I agree with you. I loved that movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 06:15 PM)
Don't like great actors?

Not Spacey. I don't believe he's a bad actor, like Paul Walker, I just can't stand watching him. I'm tired of him playing the "arrogant, yet softspoken father/brother/criminal with a heart of gold who has deep secrets" character. Don't you have an actor that everyone recognizes as great yet you just can't follow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Feb 21, 2009 -> 05:54 PM)
Not Spacey. I don't believe he's a bad actor, like Paul Walker, I just can't stand watching him. I'm tired of him playing the "arrogant, yet softspoken father/brother/criminal with a heart of gold who has deep secrets" character. Don't you have an actor that everyone recognizes as great yet you just can't follow?

Sean Penn. He's a great actor and State of Grace is one of my all time favorites (largely because of the great Gary Oldman but Penn too) but I just can't stomach him. I know it sounds real juvenile but I think it's his face. It's kind of like Depp in Donnie Brasco where he just looked too damn young for the role even if he was 34 at the time or DeCaprio in The Departed, a lot people just can't take him seriously as a toughguy, that's how I am with Penn. For whatever reason I just can't take him seriously and given the nature of the vast majority of his roles that's a serious issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Feb 21, 2009 -> 07:09 PM)
Sean Penn. He's a great actor and State of Grace is one of my all time favorites (largely because of the great Gary Oldman but Penn too) but I just can't stomach him. I know it sounds real juvenile but I think it's his face. It's kind of like Depp in Donnie Brasco where he just looked too damn young for the role even if he was 34 at the time or DeCaprio in The Departed, a lot people just can't take him seriously as a toughguy, that's how I am with Penn. For whatever reason I just can't take him seriously and given the nature of the vast majority of his roles that's a serious issue.

 

Penn also bothers me a little, and I'll probably hate him if he gets the Oscar over Rourke.

 

For two actors that I dislike that others seem to love, I'd say Christian Bale and Mark Wahlberg. I don't think either of them is that good of an actor, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Feb 21, 2009 -> 06:09 PM)
Sean Penn. He's a great actor and State of Grace is one of my all time favorites (largely because of the great Gary Oldman but Penn too) but I just can't stomach him. I know it sounds real juvenile but I think it's his face. It's kind of like Depp in Donnie Brasco where he just looked too damn young for the role even if he was 34 at the time or DeCaprio in The Departed, a lot people just can't take him seriously as a toughguy, that's how I am with Penn. For whatever reason I just can't take him seriously and given the nature of the vast majority of his roles that's a serious issue.

I'll always think of him as Jeff Spicoli no matter what character he is trying to portray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Feb 21, 2009 -> 07:29 PM)
Penn also bothers me a little, and I'll probably hate him if he gets the Oscar over Rourke.

 

For two actors that I dislike that others seem to love, I'd say Christian Bale and Mark Wahlberg. I don't think either of them is that good of an actor, though.

 

I wouldnt even put those two in the same sentence. Bale has a much bigger acting repertoire and better skills than Wahlberg will ever have, like or dislike the guy.

 

The guy I am starting to dislike a lot is Clive Owen. I just dont see the draw to the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Feb 22, 2009 -> 08:51 AM)
I really enjoyed Owen in The Children of Men.

 

That movie slowed to a crawl for me. Good premise, I actually read a old "Tales from the crypt" comic that had a very similar plot(and a much cooler ending), but I just thought the followthrough fell very short

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw Taken last night and was thoroughly entertained. Yeah most of it was implausible and there were some corny scenes, especially everything leading up to the trip to Paris, but it was fun.

 

I'm also surprised at PG-13 ratings given to movies like this and Dark Knight. They were both ultra violent and I couldn't help but think what the heck did it need to get an R rating? I guess if they showed a boob it would have gotten the R but having 40 people savagely killed or injured is fine. A sad commentary on society today that violence is so easily accepted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Feb 22, 2009 -> 08:27 AM)
I wouldnt even put those two in the same sentence. Bale has a much bigger acting repertoire and better skills than Wahlberg will ever have, like or dislike the guy.

 

The guy I am starting to dislike a lot is Clive Owen. I just dont see the draw to the guy.

 

I put them in the same sentence because they are both actors that the general public drools over. Bale is definitely a hundred times more talented than Wahlberg. I still don't think either is a very good actor, though.

 

Mark Wahlberg is like Ben Affleck to me...I think both of their lesser-known brothers are more talented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Feb 22, 2009 -> 10:03 AM)
Saw Taken last night and was thoroughly entertained. Yeah most of it was implausible and there were some corny scenes, especially everything leading up to the trip to Paris, but it was fun.

 

I'm also surprised at PG-13 ratings given to movies like this and Dark Knight. They were both ultra violent and I couldn't help but think what the heck did it need to get an R rating? I guess if they showed a boob it would have gotten the R but having 40 people savagely killed or injured is fine. A sad commentary on society today that violence is so easily accepted.

 

There was no blood or gore of any kind. That's why it got the rating it did. And that last sentence made you sound really fruity :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Feb 22, 2009 -> 09:40 AM)
There was no blood or gore of any kind. That's why it got the rating it did. And that last sentence made you sound really fruity :P

Approximately 20 people murdered including a graphic scene of a man getting run over by a truck, 18 year old girls strung out on heroin, sex trafficking, and foul language equals PG-13? Sure there wasn't a ton of blood but give me a break. When you have a 13 year old you'll see where I'm coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Feb 22, 2009 -> 11:12 AM)
Approximately 20 people murdered including a graphic scene of a man getting run over by a truck, 18 year old girls strung out on heroin, sex trafficking, and foul language equals PG-13? Sure there wasn't a ton of blood but give me a break. When you have a 13 year old you'll see where I'm coming from.

 

Let's hope that's a long time from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...