Jump to content

Catch-All Anything Thread


Chisoxfn

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 03:36 PM)
Inexplicably in the mood for some Pink Floyd now. :)

 

1185072965_f.jpg

 

I was just thinking how much fun LPs were when you could flip them over and listen to the other side. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just read this on Yahoo:

 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-1...name-game_N.htm

 

The part that caught my attention was this:

"major league baseball players whose first or last names began with K (the strikeout-signifying letter) are significantly more likely to strike out, according to the report published in the December issue of Psychological Science."

 

So here are the all-time single season strikeout leaders:

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/SO_season.shtml

 

The FIRST person with a K in either name?

Dave Kingman, tied for 89th place, then Kingman again tied for 110th place.

The first non-Kingman K name?

Ron Kittle, tied for 135th place all-time.

 

Career strikeout leader for the letter K?

Kingman, 10th all-time, followed by Harmon Killebrew at 15, Ken Griffey Jr at 25 and Jeff Kent at 48.

 

Not exactly "significantly" more likely to strike out IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(The Critic @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 05:28 PM)
Not exactly "significantly" more likely to strike out IMO...

That's not at all how one would determine whether or not a correlation was significant. If nothing else, the obvious place to start is to determine the average. For every guy at the top of the list, there's a guy at the bottom of the list too. So you could probably calculate an average per player amongst each letter, and an average k/ab for each letter as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 07:51 PM)
That's not at all how one would determine whether or not a correlation was significant. If nothing else, the obvious place to start is to determine the average. For every guy at the top of the list, there's a guy at the bottom of the list too. So you could probably calculate an average per player amongst each letter, and an average k/ab for each letter as well.

 

Nah, that's too much work. I lost interest halfway through my own post, for cryin' out loud!

 

:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(The Critic @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 08:28 PM)
I just read this on Yahoo:

 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-1...name-game_N.htm

 

The part that caught my attention was this:

"major league baseball players whose first or last names began with K (the strikeout-signifying letter) are significantly more likely to strike out, according to the report published in the December issue of Psychological Science."

 

So here are the all-time single season strikeout leaders:

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/SO_season.shtml

 

The FIRST person with a K in either name?

Dave Kingman, tied for 89th place, then Kingman again tied for 110th place.

The first non-Kingman K name?

Ron Kittle, tied for 135th place all-time.

 

Career strikeout leader for the letter K?

Kingman, 10th all-time, followed by Harmon Killebrew at 15, Ken Griffey Jr at 25 and Jeff Kent at 48.

 

Not exactly "significantly" more likely to strike out IMO...

 

 

1. Reggie Jackson+* 2597 L

2. Sammy Sosa (38) 2306 R

3. Jim Thome* (36) 2043 L

4. Andres Galarraga 2003 R

5. Jose Canseco 1942 R

6. Willie Stargell+* 1936 L

7. Mike Schmidt+ 1883 R

8. Fred McGriff* 1882 L

9. Tony Perez+ 1867 R

10. Dave Kingman 1816 R

11. Bobby Bonds 1757 R

12. Craig Biggio (41) 1753 R

13. Dale Murphy 1748 R

14. Lou Brock+* 1730 L

15. Mickey Mantle+# 1710 B

16. Harmon Killebrew+ 1699 R

17. Chili Davis# 1698 B

18. Dwight Evans 1697 R

19. Rickey Henderson 1694 R

20. Dave Winfield+ 1686 R

 

6 of 20.

 

Yeah.

 

That theory works out well.

 

 

FWIW, Thome could have the record in 3 seasons.

Edited by knightni
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(The Critic @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 08:28 PM)
I just read this on Yahoo:

 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-1...name-game_N.htm

 

The part that caught my attention was this:

"major league baseball players whose first or last names began with K (the strikeout-signifying letter) are significantly more likely to strike out, according to the report published in the December issue of Psychological Science."

 

So here are the all-time single season strikeout leaders:

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/SO_season.shtml

 

The FIRST person with a K in either name?

Dave Kingman, tied for 89th place, then Kingman again tied for 110th place.

The first non-Kingman K name?

Ron Kittle, tied for 135th place all-time.

 

Career strikeout leader for the letter K?

Kingman, 10th all-time, followed by Harmon Killebrew at 15, Ken Griffey Jr at 25 and Jeff Kent at 48.

 

Not exactly "significantly" more likely to strike out IMO...

This was debunked by THT... There are something like 10 other letters that produce higher results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would also have to determine how often the letter K appears versus the other letters. To use an extreme example, if there were only 25 players with a "K name" and 23 where in the top 1,000 of all time, that would probably be significant. So it is more than just looking at the averages. If K represents 2% of the players and they are 5% of the strikeouts, that is significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Texsox @ Nov 17, 2007 -> 09:18 AM)
You would also have to determine how often the letter K appears versus the other letters. To use an extreme example, if there were only 25 players with a "K name" and 23 where in the top 1,000 of all time, that would probably be significant. So it is more than just looking at the averages. If K represents 2% of the players and they are 5% of the strikeouts, that is significant.

They did... They used standard deviations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Nov 17, 2007 -> 06:26 PM)
I tried to warn people in the catch anything thread a while back. Now that you have seen it, go on Youtube, and watch the reactions of people. Some are quite good.

 

I made it about one second into the "good" part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(3E8 @ Nov 16, 2007 -> 11:33 PM)
2 girls 1 cup is the worst thing I ever have or will see in my life

That is just ridiculous. Have you seen the spoof done by John Mayer...so funny. But ya, I've never seen anything quite like 2 girls one cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the guys here at work got to about the "good part" and then stopped. I have no intention of seeing this thing.

 

One thought though. Once upon a time a person could make a film like this and be fairly sure that nobody they know would see this film. But now, thanks to the internet and how everybody now watches things that once upon a time they never would have, somewhere somebody just said:

 

"dude...that's your sister (daughter...whatever)".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(The Critic @ Nov 19, 2007 -> 01:55 PM)
You really are the anti-jock, aren't you?

:)

 

You betcha. I went skiiing once. It consisted of me getting to the top of the hill, deciding I didn't like being that high, and walking down it. Everybody laughed at the idea of me skiiing and just pictured me standing on a hill smoking and saying how much it sucked. That was pretty much it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Kid Gleason @ Nov 19, 2007 -> 01:00 PM)
You betcha. I went skiiing once. It consisted of me getting to the top of the hill, deciding I didn't like being that high, and walking down it. Everybody laughed at the idea of me skiiing and just pictured me standing on a hill smoking and saying how much it sucked. That was pretty much it.

I'm with ya on skiing. I bet I could do it if I wanted to, but I've seen enough skiing injuries to figure it's not worth it to me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...