GoodAsGould Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 These 2 new buildings especially the Spire kind of remind me of the skyline in Shanghai, which in my opinion looked much more impressive than what we have in Chicago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Jul 29, 2007 -> 11:05 PM) These 2 new buildings especially the Spire kind of remind me of the skyline in Shanghai, which in my opinion looked much more impressive than what we have in Chicago. So, hopefully with these new additions, our skyline will possibly hold a candle to Shanghai's. . . Meh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggliopipe Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 One of the larger buildings currently under construction and scheduled for completion in 2009 is the 89 story Waterview Tower, set to be the city's 5th tallest building. It will be located on Wacker between LaSalle and Clark. I'm sure there are better drawings than these out there... Also under construction is 87 story Aqua (set to open 2009), at N Columbus and E Southwater St. I looooooove new buildings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 QUOTE(maggliopipe @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 09:39 AM) One of the larger buildings currently under construction and scheduled for completion in 2009 is the 89 story Waterview Tower, set to be the city's 5th tallest building. It will be located on Wacker between LaSalle and Clark. I'm sure there are better drawings than these out there... Also under construction is 87 story Aqua (set to open 2009), at N Columbus and E Southwater St. I looooooove new buildings. Didn't know about those 2. The Waterview Tower looks very nice. Here's the picture from Wikipedia: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 Southsider...I agree with you. What would the city's skyline be if people b****ed about Mies Van Der Rohe, Louis Sullivan, Skidmore, etc. Things like the Spire, Aqua, etc. make Chicago what it is. Except for that one building on Wacker just north of Randolph...that thing is a monstrosity!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balance Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 QUOTE(CanOfCorn @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 12:02 PM) Southsider...I agree with you. What would the city's skyline be if people b****ed about Mies Van Der Rohe, Louis Sullivan, Skidmore, etc. Things like the Spire, Aqua, etc. make Chicago what it is. Except for that one building on Wacker just north of Randolph...that thing is a monstrosity!!! Do you mean the Smurfit-Stone Building? I always thought it looked pretty neat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 QUOTE(Balance @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 04:50 PM) Do you mean the Smurfit-Stone Building? I always thought it looked pretty neat. I heard that the architects had originall yneglected to put heating elements in the slanted roof and it was only after the first big snow in 1984 when there was a couple of inches accumulated on the roof that it dawned on them that they had the makings of a landslide on their hands and then went back and put in heating elements. Can anybody confirm this or is this the most urban of urban legends? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 QUOTE(Balance @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 03:50 PM) Do you mean the Smurfit-Stone Building? I always thought it looked pretty neat. Nope...that's Michigan and Randolph. Go West on Randolph. I can't even explain it. I've hated it ever since I saw it. Kinda looks like an crappy Connect Four board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 30, 2007 Share Posted July 30, 2007 QUOTE(CanOfCorn @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 12:16 PM) Southsider...I agree with you. What would the city's skyline be if people b****ed about Mies Van Der Rohe, Louis Sullivan, Skidmore, etc. Things like the Spire, Aqua, etc. make Chicago what it is. Except for that one building on Wacker just north of Randolph...that thing is a monstrosity!!! http://www.google.com/maps?q=W+Lake+St+%26...p;z=18&om=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 05:27 PM) http://www.google.com/maps?q=W+Lake+St+%26...p;z=18&om=1 N wacker, not ew wacker most likely. Wacker turns and runs north and south and intersects with lake st. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 i really want to know what this ugly building is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 09:16 PM) N wacker, not ew wacker most likely. Wacker turns and runs north and south and intersects with lake st. Yeah, that was supposed to take you to the Franklin and Lake which is right where Lake and N Wacker intersect, if you look that's where the green arrow is. I'm not really sure why it went a few blocks east like that. http://www.google.com/maps?q=W+Lake+St+%26...005021&z=18 I assume that's the building he's talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 10:40 PM) Yeah, that was supposed to take you to the Franklin and Lake which is right where Lake and N Wacker intersect, if you look that's where the green arrow is. I'm not really sure why it went a few blocks east like that. http://www.google.com/maps?q=W+Lake+St+%26...005021&z=18 I assume that's the building he's talking about. Ah Grasshopper, you are wrong... It IS N. Wacker and W. Randolph. Go a couple of blocks west and south. Edited July 31, 2007 by CanOfCorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 QUOTE(CanOfCorn @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 11:04 PM) Ah Grasshopper, you are wrong... It IS N. Wacker and W. Randolph. Go a couple of blocks west and south. The whole "on Wacker, just north of Randolph" thing kind of threw me off since it's south of Randolph. So you're talking about 123 N. Wacker then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 (edited) Damn! I knew about the Spire; I didn't know about all these other skyscrapers in construction. Looks like the ones mentioned, outside of the Spire, should be done around the time the International Olympic Committee determines if we get the games or not. That should only help our cause. Man, the Chitown skyline is going to be beyond amazing by the time they finish the Spire. Edited July 31, 2007 by Jordan4life_2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 How about this one? I watched this one get built from the ground up. I used to cut across it when it was a vacant lot so I was able to see it from start to finish. Also 111 S Wacker is pretty recent as is the building right next to it the hyatt center 71 East Huron is another interesting looking one. http://chicagoarchitecture.info/ great place for info on new buildings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 31, 2007 Share Posted July 31, 2007 I really like that new eco-green building they put up recently as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 QUOTE(Controlled Chaos @ Jul 31, 2007 -> 08:40 AM) How about this one? I watched this one get built from the ground up. I used to cut across it when it was a vacant lot so I was able to see it from start to finish. I work right next door to the 111 Wacker building... Its nice and airy looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 I live in a town of 15,000 people - Asbury Park. We currently have one building in our skyline. The Asbury Tower built in the early 1970s and consists of Senior Housing. It's 27 stories tall and was the tallest building on the New Jersey Shore until casinos were built in Atlantic City. It is the tallest building between AC and NYC. It will soon be joined by a number of other taller buildings. All condo buildings and all blight. The only vaguely interesting building is the Esperanza. Here's what it will look like I would love to have more interesting stuff to look at in my day to day view. Instead we get ten to fifteen story uninspired condo blight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mplssoxfan Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 QUOTE(CanOfCorn @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 12:15 PM) Southsider...I agree with you. What would the city's skyline be if people b****ed about Mies Van Der Rohe, Louis Sullivan, Skidmore, etc. Things like the Spire, Aqua, etc. make Chicago what it is. Except for that one building on Wacker just north of Randolph...that thing is a monstrosity!!! There's this one building on the north side, I think it's at about Addison and Clark -- really ugly -- smells, too! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted August 1, 2007 Share Posted August 1, 2007 QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 30, 2007 -> 11:34 PM) The whole "on Wacker, just north of Randolph" thing kind of threw me off since it's south of Randolph. So you're talking about 123 N. Wacker then. Nope...this one. 150 N. Wacker They make it look much better in the picture. But when you drive by it...eeeeeeeee-yuck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 Wanted to bump this. The Trump Tower is finally getting places. The Spire's foundation and what not is still under construction. And I today realized that the Aqua building will be right near the Aon Center. With them being very similar heights, I think they are going to complement each other well. Coming from the south on Lake Shore Drive is going to be something else. BTW, my fascination with this mainly comes from seeing progress every couple months. Being away at school, and not going downtown much anyway while in Chicago, it's cool to come back and see those buildings getting taller and taller. SKYSCRAPERS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION: Aqua: 225 N Columbus (next to Aon Center) Waterview Tower: 121 W Wacker (Across the river from the Merchandise Mart, not far from Trump) Trump Tower: 401 North Wabash Avenue (Old Sun-Times Building location) 300 North Lasalle: 321 N LaSalle (Across from future Waterview) Legacy Tower at Millennium Park: Monroe and Wabash Then we also have the Chicago Spire obviously (built out near the Navy Pier entrance) and One Musuem Park, which likes out of place right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 It's good to see we're finally past the "OMG, tall buildings are targets" phase once and for all. I like the Aqua building. It has to be a good 1,000+ feet if it's comparable to the Aon Center, which -- at a time long since passed -- was the 10th tallest building in the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ May 12, 2008 -> 02:02 AM) It's good to see we're finally past the "OMG, tall buildings are targets" phase once and for all. I like the Aqua building. It has to be a good 1,000+ feet if it's comparable to the Aon Center, which -- at a time long since passed -- was the 10th tallest building in the world. According to Wikipedia, Aon Center (83 floors) stands at 1136 ft tall and is 16th largest in the world currently and Aqua will be somewhere around 822 feet tall with 87 floors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 Another interesting project to watch is Blue Cross/Blue Shield getting 30ish more floors on top of its exsisting structure. Because of its locations right on the northern end of Millenium Park it is an easy one to watch the progress of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.