Jenksismyhero Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Wtf is wrong with this country? It's a wonder that everyone hates people in my profession. This ass-bag lawyer should be stripped of his license for this crap. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/bask...t.ap/index.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 "Our moment was stolen from us," Vaughn said. "Instead of us coming here to enjoy what we accomplished and how far we came, we had to sit back and look at media asking questions about what he said." Well, noone told you to go on Oprah and claim victimhood. or did they? Should have taken the high road and refused to talk about that, and instead talked about your accomplishments. But no, that doesn't pay. Jenks, I am sure you can find worse cases that have come to court than this. (Although this is a bad one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 I would be pissed too if someone called me a nappy headed ho on one of the biggest radio shows in the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted August 15, 2007 Author Share Posted August 15, 2007 QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Aug 15, 2007 -> 04:22 PM) I would be pissed too if someone called me a nappy headed ho on one of the biggest radio shows in the country. Please. Didn't we all learn when we were two years old that words can never hurt us? She's an unknown woman’s basketball player. She has no reputation to damage. This is a perfect example of a frivolous lawsuit and I hope the court comes down on this lawyer for filing such garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 QUOTE(Jenksismyb**** @ Aug 15, 2007 -> 04:27 PM) Please. Didn't we all learn when we were two years old that words can never hurt us? She's an unknown woman’s basketball player. She has no reputation to damage. This is a perfect example of a frivolous lawsuit and I hope the court comes down on this lawyer for filing such garbage. "You called me a s***head. My head is neither made of, or full of s***, therefore, I shall sue you on the grounds that other people see me as something that we already know I'm not. And honestly, if they do, why should that bother me.... oops, HAVE THAT STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD!!!" In other words, what you said, Jenks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Here's one for ya. A lawyer wants a judge to recuse himself because he is too religious http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/news.html?news_id=44458 He says because he hired some law clerks from Ave Maria Law School, and donated some money to the school. Also claims he is biased against women and working mothers and such, even though it is noted he has ruled in favor of strippers in employment cases. Oh, and here is the kicker: on page 11, he basically says that the judge has to recuse himself, because once he reads all this crap I am saying about him, he could never give my client a fair trial. Other stuff too in the motion. Long read. http://www.courtzero.org/spolteraffidavit.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Aug 15, 2007 -> 04:22 PM) I would be pissed too if someone called me a nappy headed ho on one of the biggest radio shows in the country. Whatever. Nappy headed ho. I kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Aug 15, 2007 -> 10:33 PM) Here's one for ya. A lawyer wants a judge to recuse himself because he is too religious http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/news.html?news_id=44458 He says because he hired some law clerks from Ave Maria Law School, and donated some money to the school. Also claims he is biased against women and working mothers and such, even though it is noted he has ruled in favor of strippers in employment cases. Oh, and here is the kicker: on page 11, he basically says that the judge has to recuse himself, because once he reads all this crap I am saying about him, he could never give my client a fair trial. Other stuff too in the motion. Long read. http://www.courtzero.org/spolteraffidavit.pdf I also rule in favor of strippers in employment cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 QUOTE(GoSox05 @ Aug 16, 2007 -> 08:12 AM) I also rule in favor of strippers in employment cases. Just employment cases??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts