Rex Kickass Posted October 12, 2007 Share Posted October 12, 2007 So who does Soxtalk support? Vote and share with all of us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 I've been all over the place but as it stands right now, I'd go with Obama on this side of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Oct 12, 2007 -> 11:26 PM) I've been all over the place but as it stands right now, I'd go with Obama on this side of things. Really? I would have thought Richardson for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted October 13, 2007 Share Posted October 13, 2007 QUOTE(Texsox @ Oct 13, 2007 -> 01:55 PM) Really? I would have thought Richardson for you. That had been my leaning up until recently. Some of his stances that he has "refined" I disagree with. The other reason is "electibility". I don't think Richardson has a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 14, 2007 Share Posted October 14, 2007 In the primaries I don't worry about electibility, I think of this as a chance to send the party a message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 No love for Hillary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 As far as I'm concerned, anybody but Hillary. In fact, I may just vote for the Democratic nominee just to thank the Dems for not choosing her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 I'm with YAS on this one. And it's unfair but I just don't want the baggage of Clinton in the White House. I don't want him as the First Male. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 I had to vote "other" as in "none of the above". Tried as I did, when it came down to the issues, I just don't agree with anyone in this group on the direction the country needs to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted October 15, 2007 Share Posted October 15, 2007 QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Oct 15, 2007 -> 02:19 PM) I had to vote "other" as in "none of the above". Tried as I did, when it came down to the issues, I just don't agree with anyone in this group on the direction the country needs to go. Neither do I, but I can say the same for the Re-pube-licans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Oct 15, 2007 -> 02:01 PM) Neither do I, but I can say the same for the Re-pube-licans. Hahaha Someone was bored at work because I can't think of any other reason to type "Re-pube-licans." Hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Oh no, I actually heard the phrase on a show that I had on when listening to the traffic report one night on the way home. The thing is, it fits. These guys are not "Republicans", they have long abandoned the issues that made them Republicans. They are a new breed, that cater to the media and Democrats, hence, "Re-pube-licans". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Pratt Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 So Democrats and media = pubes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Oct 16, 2007 -> 08:37 AM) So Democrats and media = pubes? Pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Oct 16, 2007 -> 09:35 AM) These guys are not "Republicans", they have long abandoned the issues that made them Republicans. Like a balanced budget? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTE(Texsox @ Oct 16, 2007 -> 11:22 AM) Like a balanced budget? Like illegal immigration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTE(kapkomet @ Oct 16, 2007 -> 09:35 AM) Oh no, I actually heard the phrase on a show that I had on when listening to the traffic report one night on the way home. The thing is, it fits. These guys are not "Republicans", they have long abandoned the issues that made them Republicans. They are a new breed, that cater to the media and Democrats, hence, "Re-pube-licans". If they really catered to Democrats, don't you think we'd actually be able to get things passed in Congress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Oct 16, 2007 -> 07:24 PM) If they really catered to Democrats, don't you think we'd actually be able to get things passed in Congress? No, because neither party wants the other to take any credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts