Melissa1334 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 i want uribe gone. i dont want to bring back most of the players from last year. pk, aj, dye,fields, uribe, thome-2 much. and theyre all slow. we need more speed so i doubt he'll be back... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 08:48 AM) How do you figure Greene is a significantly better hitter than Wilson? I'm not a huge stats guy, but Wilson is a career .269 hitter, trending up. Greene is .254 for his career. Their walk rate is basically the same. Greene strikes out a ton more than Wilson. Their career on base % is identical. Holy crap, I just looked, and he's actually right. Greene's OPS last year was .759, and his career best is .795. Wilson put up a .790 last year, and has a career high of .794. Greene has kept his above .700 most years, and yeah there's the Petco difference, but yowza. Greene did put up a .841 away from Petco last year, which is something, but the quesiton is how much you trust home/away splits to determine what a guy will do when you move him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 10:48 AM) How do you figure Greene is a significantly better hitter than Wilson? I'm not a huge stats guy, but Wilson is a career .269 hitter, trending up. Greene is .254 for his career. Their walk rate is basically the same. Greene strikes out a ton more than Wilson. Their career on base % is identical. If you're looking at their career lines then you'll notice a near 70 point difference in SLG and a 22 point difference in OPS+ (HUGE) both in Greene's favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 10:57 AM) Holy crap, I just looked, and he's actually right. Greene's OPS last year was .759, and his career best is .795. Wilson put up a .790 last year, and has a career high of .794. Greene has kept his above .700 most years, and yeah there's the Petco difference, but yowza. Greene did put up a .841 away from Petco last year, which is something, but the quesiton is how much you trust home/away splits to determine what a guy will do when you move him. There is a slight difference in the level of competition within their divisions. Green had to face significantly better pitching in the NL West versus what Wilson faced in the NL Central. The parks in the West are larger parks, pitching oriented versus the NL Central parks. I dont know if I like either, but I like them more than the human torque engine in Uribe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 04:48 PM) How do you figure Greene is a significantly better hitter than Wilson? I'm not a huge stats guy, but Wilson is a career .269 hitter, trending up. Greene is .254 for his career. Their walk rate is basically the same. Greene strikes out a ton more than Wilson. Their career on base % is identical. I guess I'm just very impressed with Greene when I watch him hit. I think he could easily be a 30-35 homer hitter with superb defense. However, I just talked with someone who's at the meetings, and he doesn't think Greene will be traded. I am intrigued though seeing a new guy at SS that might be able to help us against tough lefties, instead of seeing Uribe K on changeups in the dirt or popping up on the right side of the infield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Considering what it would cost to get any of these 2, I would prefer bringing Uribe back playing for a contract. He has a lot of ability. The White Sox need a major upgrade at SS, or I don't see the purpose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scenario Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 (edited) QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 10:57 AM) Holy crap, I just looked, and he's actually right. Greene's OPS last year was .759, and his career best is .795. Wilson put up a .790 last year, and has a career high of .794. Greene has kept his above .700 most years, and yeah there's the Petco difference, but yowza. Greene did put up a .841 away from Petco last year, which is something, but the quesiton is how much you trust home/away splits to determine what a guy will do when you move him. Here's another interesting comparison... Wilson's career splits for home/away are... BA/OPB/OPS - Home .281/.324/.707 BA/OPB/OPS - Away .256/.300/.671 Greene's career splits... BA/OPB/OPS - Home .228/.288/.659 BA/OPB/OPS - Away .280/.335/.849 Uribe's career splits... BA/OPB/OPS - Home .273/.315/.804 BA/OPB/OPS - Away .235/.275/.641 Edited November 6, 2007 by scenario Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 10:57 AM) Holy crap, I just looked, and he's actually right. Greene's OPS last year was .759, and his career best is .795. Wilson put up a .790 last year, and has a career high of .794. Greene has kept his above .700 most years, and yeah there's the Petco difference, but yowza. Greene did put up a .841 away from Petco last year, which is something, but the quesiton is how much you trust home/away splits to determine what a guy will do when you move him. It's more about consistency. Jack Wilson has been in the league for 6 full seasons in 4 of those seasons he posted an OPS+ in the 70's or lower the other 2 were above 100. Khalil Greene has 4 full seasons 2 of them he posted a mid 90's OPS+, another was an even 100 and his first full season was 114. IMO there's a HUGE difference offensively between the two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 11:05 AM) Considering what it would cost to get any of these 2, I would prefer bringing Uribe back playing for a contract. He has a lot of ability. The White Sox need a major upgrade at SS, or I don't see the purpose. The more money Uribe has made, the worse his bat has gotten. He has also been getting larger over the last few years. His ability is worthless is he doesnt have drive to work and make himself better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Dick Allen @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 05:05 PM) Considering what it would cost to get any of these 2, I would prefer bringing Uribe back playing for a contract. He has a lot of ability. The White Sox need a major upgrade at SS, or I don't see the purpose. With that in mind, I hope that KW doesn't think that bringing in a new SS and CF is going to turn this team's fortunes around. We better be looking to upgrade our bench as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Jack Wilson - career OPS+ 79, career high is 105 Khalil Greene - career OPS+ 101, career high is 114 If Jack Wilson isn't hitting .295+, he's a pretty terrible hitter. If Khalil Greene hits even about .250, he's a pretty average hitter, and when he hits .270+, he's an above average shortstop offensively. Add to it that Greene is also younger, cheaper, and if I read correctly, around longer, and the more attractive option is obvious. However, price also has to be brought into the equation. Greene is almost assuredly going to cost Garland plus some, whereas Wilson may come much cheaper than that (though giving any of the organization's top 5 prospects would likely be a bad deal). It really depends on what the market holds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 As long as Gene Honda isn't saying "David Eckstein!" I'll be happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vance Law Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 10:57 AM) Holy crap, I just looked, and he's actually right. Greene's OPS last year was .759, and his career best is .795. Wilson put up a .790 last year, and has a career high of .794. Greene has kept his above .700 most years, and yeah there's the Petco difference, but yowza. Greene did put up a .841 away from Petco last year, which is something, but the quesiton is how much you trust home/away splits to determine what a guy will do when you move him. OPS+ adjusts for park effects. 100 is league average Jack Wilson career OPS+ 79 since 01 (40, 67, 70, 104, 74, 77, 105) Khalil Greene career OPS+ 101 since 04 (114, 95, 97, 100) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(fathom @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 11:08 AM) With that in mind, I hope that KW doesn't think that bringing in a new SS and CF is going to turn this team's fortunes around. We better be looking to upgrade our bench as well. What's weird is, it seemed like the club had one of the best benches in baseball in 2006 - Mack, Ozuna, Cintron, Gload and Alomar. But with Ozuna's injury, Gload gone, Mack being traded, Alomar replaced by Hall and Cintron inexplicably falling apart... they suddenly had one of the worst benches in baseball in 2007 with the likes of Gonzalez, Hall, Terrero, Molina, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29andPoplar Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 If you're looking at their career lines then you'll notice a near 70 point difference in SLG and a 22 point difference in OPS+ (HUGE) both in Greene's favor. It really depends what kind of hitter you want from that spot as well. If you want the guy who can provide more pop, Greene is your guy. A lot of those doubles would likely be HR's at the Cell. However, the K's stick out to me, and with Guillen wanting to reduce K's in the lineup ... Wilson does a lot better in that dept. I like the higher average hitters who get their bat on the ball, but what I think doesn't matter. What matters is what type of fit the White Sox want. It is becoming clear they want the anti-Uribe in terms of plate performance. No pun intended. I believe Greene is the better defensive player, just from my own eyes. Although I feel Greene would cost more to get vs. Wilson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 05:19 PM) What's weird is, it seemed like the club had one of the best benches in baseball in 2006 - Mack, Ozuna, Cintron, Gload and Alomar. But with Ozuna's injury, Gload gone, Mack being traded, Alomar replaced by Hall and Cintron inexplicably falling apart... they suddenly had one of the worst benches in baseball in 2007 with the likes of Gonzalez, Hall, Terrero, Molina, etc. Well, that's also because our minor league system is so thin, especially offensively. I thought the team did a terrible job of utilizing the DL for guys like Cintron last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(29andPoplar @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 05:24 PM) Although I feel Greene would cost more to get vs. Wilson. Absolutely....Wilson is the likely option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(fathom @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 08:50 AM) Khalil Greene would put up monster numbers in the Cell. I think Jack Wilson is an upgrade over Uribe, especially if Ozzie wants a team that he can put hit-and-runs on, etc. ^^^ I'd absolutely LOVE Khalil Greene. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Another huge drawback to Wilson is his contract, it's not pretty. 2008: $6.5M 2009: $7.25M 2010: $8.4M club option w/ $600K buyout That's a whole lot of money for a player who's really not very good. 2 years, $14.35M guaranteed. That's steep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klaus kinski Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 11:19 AM) What's weird is, it seemed like the club had one of the best benches in baseball in 2006 - Mack, Ozuna, Cintron, Gload and Alomar. But with Ozuna's injury, Gload gone, Mack being traded, Alomar replaced by Hall and Cintron inexplicably falling apart... they suddenly had one of the worst benches in baseball in 2007 with the likes of Gonzalez, Hall, Terrero, Molina, etc. And subtract versatile dependable replacements like Timo and Willie Harris from the year before-and it makes you wonder what the plan was? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 05:38 PM) Thats awful. I would rather have Uribe for one more year, have him in a contract year than be locked into a slightly better player for 2009. Yeah, that's quite ugly. For that amount of money, we really should have gone after Renteria then if we're serious about Wilson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Article does not much give hope for improvement in 2008! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
29andPoplar Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Yeah, that's quite ugly. For that amount of money, we really should have gone after Renteria then if we're serious about Wilson. Well they didn't match up with the Braves (see your 100% accurate farm system comments). Unfortunately the SS market looks rather thin. There are red flags with most who are available, and the good young ones under control are guys teams want to keep or would cost a ton in talent. As a result sometimes teams have to look at incremental improvements. Just to focus on Wilson for a second. I would say he's an upgrade over Uribe. If he can be had in exchange for some non essential pieces, it's worth it. They have the money and the extra $1.5M in 2008 plus the 2009 guaranteed+buyout won't hamstring them. Also as you say, re-doing the bench is critical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 QUOTE(Soxfest @ Nov 6, 2007 -> 12:47 PM) Article does not much give hope for improvement in 2008! Thanks, mighty Thor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 go out and get Greene, looks like he's the best option of all listed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.