Jump to content

Oliver Stone to make "W"


NorthSideSox72

Recommended Posts

now, if the intentions are to make an unbiased film just presenting the life of Bush and such, I have no problem with such a film.

 

However, if they are going to make it into a Bush is the devil, he sacrifices babies type of movie, then I do have a bit of a problem with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BearSox @ Mar 26, 2008 -> 02:47 PM)
now, if the intentions are to make an unbiased film just presenting the life of Bush and such, I have no problem with such a film.

 

However, if they are going to make it into a Bush is the devil, he sacrifices babies type of movie, then I do have a bit of a problem with that.

Why?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BearSox @ Mar 26, 2008 -> 02:47 PM)
now, if the intentions are to make an unbiased film just presenting the life of Bush and such, I have no problem with such a film.

 

However, if they are going to make it into a Bush is the devil, he sacrifices babies type of movie, then I do have a bit of a problem with that.

I would consider your 2nd statement an unbiased version of the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Mar 26, 2008 -> 12:51 PM)
I would consider your 2nd statement an unbiased version of the truth.

The problem is...there's a lot of people who would agree...and there's a lot of people who would disagree. Which is why this movie just doesn't work right now. It's flat out too soon. We still don't know half of the stuff this administration did. We still don't know how things like the Iraq debacle will end. Bush is still a young man and could still have plenty left that he could do with his life.

 

There's no way to do this movie that will avoid making 30% of the population really happy and 70% really angry. Either you take the unabashed pro-Bush side and make his 25% approving people happy, you take the anti-Bush side and make my side happy, or you basically tell the happy story of his marriage with Laura and leave out everything that would be remotely interesting, and thereby make no one except David Broder happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really a fan of Stone, but Brolin's great so I'm going to have to see this.

 

I don't think the film is supposed to be about his presidency, so much as it is about his rise to the presidency. Dubya can be a pretty endearing character so it might be pretty interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(YASNY @ Mar 26, 2008 -> 11:18 PM)
There is no way in hell that this won't rake Bush across the coals. Brolin is married to that lefty loon Streisand.

 

I believe you are confusing Josh Brolin with his father James, who is the one actually married to Streisand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

Back, and to the Left.

 

 

 

 

Back, and to the Left.

 

[in an episode of The Critic, the phrase is parodied when Jay Sherman announces the Director's Cut of JFK with seventeen added minutes of "back, and to the left."]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(rowandrules83 @ Mar 26, 2008 -> 11:20 PM)
I believe you are confusing Josh Brolin with his father James, who is the one actually married to Streisand

 

And was set to play Reagan in that made for TV movie that CBS ultimately did not run.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Mar 27, 2008 -> 11:18 AM)

Cromwell is an excellent choice. I think Banks was a very good choice for Laura Bush as well.

 

Brolin I'm not sure of - he doesn't have the look. But he does seems to excel at playing characters that would make him a good match.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think the time is perfect to chronicle what we know in 2008 and this could be a very interesting tool to compare in the future. Basically while it is fresh, and the people are alive, and could be sources. Basically I see this as a reduction of the news coverage into one couple hour film.

I missed his earlier films but I hear D, K, and U were very good. Maybe this sequel thing has gotten out of hand :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...