Texsox Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 hey CC, you ever find a negative article about your candidate? Or only Obama? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 hey CC, you ever find a negative article about your candidate? Or only Obama? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 QUOTE(Athomeboy_2000 @ Apr 4, 2008 -> 11:28 AM) Name the Patriot.... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ope...3,0,92000.story Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine also... I'm pretty sure he isn't a patriot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 QUOTE(BearSox @ Apr 6, 2008 -> 10:12 AM) Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine also... I'm pretty sure he isn't a patriot. So as long as Wright didn't assassinate a President, he's still cool as a patriot? I can't see placing him below those that used wealth, privilege, various deferments, etc. to avoid service. Last I looked, freedom of (most kinds) of speach are allowed, so what he is doing is legal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 It was a decent article until the last sentence. There's a couple non-facts in there but doesn't say anything completely ridiculous like the OP has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 And he wasted time in his Philadelphia speech on race by saying he can't "disown" Rev. Wright any more than he could "disown the black community." No one has asked him to disown Rev. Wright. Only in a later appearance on "The View" television show did he say that he would have left the church if Rev. Wright had not retired and not acknowledged his offensive language. Now, that is just silly. Just about every talking head was wanting him to cut the Reverend adrift. Every pundit, and plenty of whispers from the Clinton campaign, wanted him to repudiate his relationship with the Reverend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Apr 6, 2008 -> 02:39 PM) Now, that is just silly. Just about every talking head was wanting him to cut the Reverend adrift. Every pundit, and plenty of whispers from the Clinton campaign, wanted him to repudiate his relationship with the Reverend. truth is the first casualty of war, and presidential campaigns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 7, 2008 Author Share Posted April 7, 2008 (edited) QUOTE (Texsox @ Apr 6, 2008 -> 09:52 AM) hey CC, you ever find a negative article about your candidate? Or only Obama? Actually, they are all my candidates since one of them will be President. And yes, I have read plenty of negative articles on Clinton and McCain, but the job of posting those has pretty much been filled by a good portion of the posters here. As to jackiehayes remark about starting a new thread, I rarely start new threads. I started this one because the other pastor one was closed. And as for this most recent article, I didn't think it had much to do with the pastor or church except for the ending. It was more a comparison of Obama and King. Juan Williams is a black liberal and isn't as easily dismissed as some extreme right wing writer like Ann Coulter or something. I thought the article was informative and didn't want it to get lost in this thread. Anyway..I'm off to the game. Go Sox. Edited April 8, 2008 by Controlled Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Fox News Gets Owned: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 My favorite part is that the reporter was 1000% subjective. He wasn't even interested in be an objective, impartial reporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 16, 2008 Author Share Posted April 16, 2008 (edited) Fox News Gets Owned Anyone getting owned with Father Pfleger used as the example...is a joke....Fox didn't get owned...Pflegar and his support for Louis Farrakhan did. Edited April 16, 2008 by Controlled Chaos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 10:52 AM) My favorite part is that the reporter was 1000% subjective. He wasn't even interested in be an objective, impartial reporter. It's Fox News. Objective isnt in their vocabulary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackie hayes Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 QUOTE (Controlled Chaos @ Apr 7, 2008 -> 09:11 AM) Actually, they are all my candidates since one of them will be President. And yes, I have read plenty of negative articles on Clinton and McCain, but the job of posting those has pretty much been filled by a good portion of the posters here. As to jackiehayes remark about starting a new thread, I rarely start new threads. I started this one because the other pastor one was closed. And as for this most recent article, I didn't think it had much to do with the pastor or church except for the ending. It was more a comparison of Obama and King. Juan Williams is a black liberal and isn't as easily dismissed as some extreme right wing writer like Ann Coulter or something. I thought the article was informative and didn't want it to get lost in this thread. Anyway..I'm off to the game. Go Sox. I just want to clarify something -- I was talking about the separate thread that you created for post #23, not this thread that the new one was merged into. To the mods -- I know I'm not licensed to post in this forum, I just wanted to clarify a remark directed at me. I hope that's all right, but if not, please delete this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 QUOTE (jackie hayes @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 12:02 PM) I just want to clarify something -- I was talking about the separate thread that you created for post #23, not this thread that the new one was merged into. To the mods -- I know I'm not licensed to post in this forum, I just wanted to clarify a remark directed at me. I hope that's all right, but if not, please delete this post. You can post here all you want, as long as you agree to the rules in the MUST READ thread and post in there to acknowledge. We'd like to see you in here, in fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts