Jump to content

Positive Catch All


Texsox

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Texsox @ Apr 30, 2008 -> 02:35 PM)
Not certain where this thought goes, but did anyone honestly think the team would not have a three game losing streak? There will be a few more, and probably a few longer ones.

 

It's not that they lost 3, its the way that they've looked losing three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guess what...

 

April is over and we are in first place! Sure we have run into a bad last week or so, but I know if you told me we'd be 14-12 and in first place a month ago I would have been extremely happy. If you told me that Danks and Floyd would be off to this good a start I would be extremely happy. If you told me Quentin was going to look like an All Star I'd be extremely happy.

 

Hopefully the day off tomorrow brings our bats back... but in case you couldn't tell, I'm extremely happy with our WhiteSox after our first month - hopefully we can keep our seat on top of our division secured. I can't wait for Swisher, Cabrera, Thome, Konerko, and whoever wants to step up at 2B to start hitting... If they get it together we will have a great team on our hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 30, 2008 -> 01:21 PM)
Sox team ERA was 2nd in the AL coming into today.

it's a great sign, isn't it? Even when they've struggled to score of late they're still finding a way to bring the tying run to the plate. The hits will come. The hits will most definitely come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 30, 2008 -> 02:39 PM)
It's not that they lost 3, its the way that they've looked losing three.

 

Generally when you lose, you look bad. It's hard to look good and lose without accidentally ruining it all and winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (almagest @ May 2, 2008 -> 10:06 AM)
Generally when you lose, you look bad. It's hard to look good and lose without accidentally ruining it all and winning.

 

You're right. All loses are identical. Losing a 1 run game to Johan Santana is the same as getting shut down by some no-name scrub while your best pitcher and bullpen get lit up for 10 runs.

 

Give me a break. Just as you can win in a dominant fashion, shutting down the opponent and having an efficient offense, and you can "win ugly," you can lose a close-but-well-played game leaving hope for the next time or you can get embarrassed.

 

To keep this positive, look at the difference between the way they lost the 1st and 2nd games of the season. After the first game, everyone was optimistic because this team battled back and made a game out of it after being down. After the second game, it looked like 2007 all over again.

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ May 2, 2008 -> 10:18 AM)
You're right. All loses are identical. Losing a 1 run game to Johan Santana is the same as getting shut down by some no-name scrub while your best pitcher and bullpen get lit up for 10 runs.

 

Give me a break. Just as you can win in a dominant fashion, shutting down the opponent and having an efficient offense, and you can "win ugly," you can lose a close-but-well-played game leaving hope for the next time or you can get embarrassed.

 

To keep this positive, look at the difference between the way they lost the 1st and 2nd games of the season. After the first game, everyone was optimistic because this team battled back and made a game out of it after being down. After the second game, it looked like 2007 all over again.

 

They also gave up a crapload of runs in the first game, whether or not they battled back. There's something bad in every loss, hence why you lose. Let's not get all "Hawkified" and go into a semantic debate about "good losses" or whatever.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that today's lineup was a step in the right direction.

 

I would use this one, though.

 

Ramirez 2B

Cabrera SS

Quentin LF

Dye RF

Thome DH

Konerko 1B

Swisher CF

Pierzynski C

Crede 3B

 

Even if Ramirez gets on 1 of 4, he can make things happen on base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (knightni @ May 8, 2008 -> 06:39 PM)
I think that today's lineup was a step in the right direction.

 

I would use this one, though.

 

Ramirez 2B

Cabrera SS

Quentin LF

Dye RF

Thome DH

Konerko 1B

Swisher CF

Pierzynski C

Crede 3B

 

Even if Ramirez gets on 1 of 4, he can make things happen on base.

 

Then let him hit 9th; you don't give one of your worst hitters the most at bats on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Anderson is an ideal 4th outfielder. He still hits for no power, but he's maintaining a .270 average, is giving good at bats, and playing incredible defense. He should be in for the 8th and/or 9th of every game on defense when we have a lead.

Edited by whitesoxfan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ May 10, 2008 -> 12:43 AM)
Brian Anderson is an ideal 4th outfielder. He still hits for no power, but he's maintaining a .270 average, is giving good at bats, and playing incredible defense. He should be in for the 8th and/or 9th of every game on defense when we have a lead.

The next time will be the first. Ozzie obviously disagrees with this philosophy considering he hasn't done it once this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ May 10, 2008 -> 01:58 AM)
The next time will be the first. Ozzie obviously disagrees with this philosophy considering he hasn't done it once this season.

 

I know it's never going to happen, and it's bad managing. We'll probably lose a game or two (or three) this year because of Ozzie's stubborness on this subject. If Anderson isn't out there on the Sexson ball tonight, as I look at the situation in the box score, this game might have gone completely different and been a loss because Swisher never catches that. Obviously that was in the 4th and isn't that relevant here in that sense, but there will be a ball or two (or three) like that in the 8th or 9th in close games later this year, and Anderson being out there instead of Swisher could be the difference between the game going to the left column or the right one.

Edited by whitesoxfan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...