Jump to content

2008 General Election Discussion Thread


HuskyCaucasian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

QUOTE (Cknolls @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 03:19 PM)
So the press will not mention this if McCain were to win, right?

 

Alright, so if, in this election states that Obama is up +6 or however much he ends up losing, and the internals for, say, white males showed him with maybe 45% but he only carried 35% of them, I will give credence to this theory. But as of right now I'm sure it's just interesting theory that people want to latch onto to seem smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Cknolls @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 10:19 AM)
So the press will not mention this if McCain were to win, right?

 

The press loves to mention plenty of stupid things. I'm sure we'll hear about it before and after the election, regardless of who wins.

 

Maybe if Obama turnout falls inline with polling, we'll never have to hear about it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta say, I'm lovin the hypocrisy these days. And it's coming from BOTH sides. Obama brings up Keating 5 and it's a "smear job" according the McCain Campaign. McCain brings up Ayres and it's a "questioning of Obama's judgement".

 

Please. Both sides. Cut it out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 10:56 AM)
I gotta say, I'm lovin the hypocrisy these days. And it's coming from BOTH sides. Obama brings up Keating 5 and it's a "smear job" according the McCain Campaign. McCain brings up Ayres and it's a "questioning of Obama's judgement".

 

Please. Both sides. Cut it out!

Do you own a mirror?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 09:56 AM)
I gotta say, I'm lovin the hypocrisy these days. And it's coming from BOTH sides. Obama brings up Keating 5 and it's a "smear job" according the McCain Campaign. McCain brings up Ayres and it's a "questioning of Obama's judgement".

 

Please. Both sides. Cut it out!

Sayith the pot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

same pollers saying he's only up 1 in Minnesota, I think they are just piss poor pollers.

ARG sucks, but it is kind of interesting that Obama put up a lead like that. It says a LOT about McCain's chances in Pennsylvania (which I think are damn near 0).

Edited by DukeNukeEm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From 538.com:

Why You Don't Bluff

 

There's been some discussion about whether John McCain's announcement last week that he was pulling out of Michigan was some kind of stunt. Well, Rasmussen has the first polling out of the state since that announcement, and it gives Barack Obama a 16 point lead. This is a state that, as recently as a month ago, looked like it might be the most important swing state in the nation.

 

Voters really, really don't like it when you blow off their state. That's why Hillary Clinton romped to such huge margins in West Virginia and Kentucky in the Democratic primaries, where Obama essentially refused to campaign. It's why Obama won by more than expected in Wisconsin and South Carolina, which Clinton pulled out of early. It's why Rudy Giuliani's decision to ignore every state that didn't begin with an 'F', end with an 'a', and have 'lorid' in the middle was a catastrophic failure.

 

So even if McCain were to want to re-engage Michigan now, he'd be facing a much steeper hill to climb. In Rasmussen's internals, independents have gone from favoring McCain by 12 points on September 21 to favoring Obama by 11 now. Nor is McCain getting any benefit of the doubt from Democrats, who now prefer Obama 95-3. If you act like you don't care about somebody's vote, you aren't going to get it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 01:58 PM)

This reminds me... I am actually, amazingly, a little bit proud of our country's political take at the moment. Why? On the surface, because of the fact that Obama has taken a much bigger lead in the past few weeks. But, its not the fact that I think Obama is a better candidate. I'm proud of the fact that the nation, specifically the independents, are penalizing the dirtier campaign for that reason. This shift lately has pretty much exactly paralleled the change in tone of the McCain campaign, from mildly negative and sniping (which is normal, and Obama does it too), to just outright nasty and Unpresidential.

 

The people are getting this one right. Those silly strings on CNN under the debate showed it too. Americans are tired of the personal attacks and overly adversarial tone, and that has been much louder from the McCain camp lately.

 

So kudos to you, independent voters. You are sending the right message.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Town hall whiplash

 

McCain's rough "town hall" debate just got a bit worse, as one questioner writes about the experience on his Facebook page:

How did I feel about
S
en. McCain
s
tating
You probably never heard of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac before thi
s
"[?]

 

Well
S
enator, I actually did. I li
k
e to thin
k
of my
s
elf a
s
a fairly intelligent per
s
on. I have a bachelor degree in Political
S
cience from Tenne
s
s
ee
S
tate,
s
o I try to
k
eep my
s
elf up to date with current affair
s
. I have a Ma
s
ter degree in Legal
S
tudie
s
from
S
outhern Illinoi
s
Univer
s
ity, a few year
s
in law
s
chool, and I am currently pur
s
uing a Ma
s
ter in Public Admini
s
tration from the Univer
s
ity of Memphi
s
. In defen
s
e of the
S
enator from Arizona I would
s
ay he i
s
an older guy, and may have made an undere
s
timation of my age. Hone
s
t mi
s
ta
k
e.

However, it could be becau
s
e I am a young African-American male. Whatever the ca
s
e may be it wa
s
s
omewhat conde
s
cending regardle
s
s
of my age to ma
k
e an a
s
s
umption regarding whether I wa
s
k
nowledgeable about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 01:49 PM)
same pollers saying he's only up 1 in Minnesota, I think they are just piss poor pollers.

well see, now I am very conflicted. I have said on the record several times I really Like SurveyUSA. They have McCain +1 in MN, and now ARG (who I completely distrust) has Obama +1. Nearly Identical results. One from a pollster I trust and one from one I dont. All other polls have Obama t least +7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 03:12 PM)
It's ARG. Throw it out.

Ok, let me re-think this out for a moment. On Sept 23, CNN had McCain only +4. Remember, WV is boarded by Ohio, PA, and Virginia.

 

Since Sep 23 (Via RCP):

PA: Obama +2.5 to Obama +13.8 (11.3 point swing)

OH: McCain +1.6 to Obama +3.9 (5.5 point swing)

VA: McCain +0.4 to Obama +5.1 (5.5 point swing)

 

So, +8 might be much, but COMPLETELY plausible.

Edited by Athomeboy_2000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Texsox @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 03:25 PM)
With Obama, I distrust the polls the most. I believe we will see the greatest error of our recent Presidential elections.

As I've said before, depending on the state, expect to see McCain do as much as 5% better than even the most accurate polls-of-polls. The fear factor will play.

 

But, with Obama taking such gigantic leads, and Palin taking a small bit of that fear factor the other way, it may not matter anymore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama's MASSIVE TV Airtime Buy:

Barack Obama has purchased a half-hour of airtime on CBS, sources confirm.

 

The Obama campaign will air a half-hour primetime special on Wednesday, Oct. 29, at 8 p.m.

 

Sources say the Obama camp is also in talks with NBC and Fox. NBC is said to be very near a deal. With Fox, the matter is likely to remain uncertain as the time period could conflict with Game 6 of the World Series.

 

A CBS spokesperson declined comment. The buy will push comedy "The New Adventures of Old Christine" to 8:30 p.m. and pre-empt "Gary Unmarried." The buy is being placed by Washington-based ad firm GMMB.

 

The direct purchase of such a large block of national airtime right before an election used to be more commonplace before campaigns began to focus their end game strategies exclusively on battleground states. Such a move is not without precedent in modern presidential politics, however -- Ross Perot did a similar purchase in 1992.

 

I am going to bet this is a "lay out the details" show. You cant get very detailed on the stump or in debates. But with 30 minutes of just you talking, you can lay out VERY specific details.

Edited by Athomeboy_2000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since AHB seems to drool over polls, here is one for you.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/111049/Obamas-R...Plus-Minus.aspx

PRINCETON, NJ -- While 6% of voters say they are less likely to vote for Barack Obama because of his race, 9% say they are more likely to vote for him, making the impact of his race a neutral to slightly positive factor when all voters' self-reported attitudes are taken into account.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Oct 9, 2008 -> 04:12 PM)
Since AHB seems to drool over polls, here is one for you.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/111049/Obamas-R...Plus-Minus.aspx

This falls in the same category as my predictions of a 5% bump for McCain over the polls. Some people are more bigoted than they admit to some pollster. I'm guessing that 6% should be at least doubled.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...