rangercal Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (CryptviLL @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 10:32 PM) ranger - i see overtime for philly game, doesnt that game determine it for us? EDIt: I see, lol Yes Phi loses we get Orl, they win, we get Bos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Lets go Cleveland, I wanna go to the games in orlando! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 So Cleveland's main goal is to win a championship. That's obvious. That's why MB decided to bench all his starters. but what if... and I realize this is highly unlikely..... what if Cleveland's intention was to have a hand in Bos playing the Bulls. I could think of many reasons why Cle would want Boston to play the bulls rather than philly. Just something to think about. I'm bored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Well that kinda sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord chas Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 opportunity blown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Win a home game against a f***ing lottery team and you don't gotta worry about this. Dumbasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 10:58 PM) Well that kinda sucks. I feel like messing up a couch like Rick James now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 We play Philly who we've swept all season, and Dalmbert strains his shoulder. Good, good night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenryan Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) I see the Magic sweeping this series but I'll play safe and say Magic in 5. Other than the Atlanta/Miami series, the Eastern Conference first round series' will be pretty boring. Edited April 16, 2009 by zenryan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Bulls are losing in 5. I can see them getting 1 win fueled by the UC home crowd. But Boston is too talented, too experienced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (Ron @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 11:18 PM) Bulls are losing in 5. I can see them getting 1 win fueled by the UC home crowd. But Boston is too talented, too experienced. I don't/didn't have great expectations for the Bulls in the playoffs anyway. Right now, the main concern should be to get Rose as much experience as possible in the post-season and maybe eek out a win or two. If things go really well, maybe make this a series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (WHarris1 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 09:59 PM) Win a home game against a f***ing lottery team and you don't gotta worry about this. Dumbasses. Shades of 2007 when they were a win away against an average Nets (although they're like 1-58 in NJ since the dynasty ended) team from a #2 seed and a free pass to the conference finals. Boston in 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 12:15 AM) Shades of 2007 when they were a win away against an average Nets (although they're like 1-58 in NJ since the dynasty ended) team from a #2 seed and a free pass to the conference finals. Boston in 5. I was excited for a possible matchup with the Magic, now I'm at Walgreens buying lube for fear of what Boston may do to this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 12:15 AM) Shades of 2007 when they were a win away against an average Nets (although they're like 1-58 in NJ since the dynasty ended) team from a #2 seed and a free pass to the conference finals. Boston in 5. Yup, we ended up falling to 5, where we soon after trounced the defending champion Miami Heat 4-0 in the first round. No one wanted to face Miami that year after coming off a championship, and now no one wants to face Boston coming off a championship. Coincidence? We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 KG out for playoffs. http://www.boston.com/sports/basketball/ce...rs_garnett.html This changes things quite a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (lostfan @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 08:48 AM) KG out for playoffs. http://www.boston.com/sports/basketball/ce...rs_garnett.html This changes things quite a bit. damn......good thing we lost last night...seriously thats huge...i think we have a decent shot at maybe winning or at least taking it deep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 SO yeah.../. This changes EVERYTHING! WOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Maybe the Bulls can make Glen Rice cry some more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 what the hell, garnett out ? WOW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 10:28 AM) Maybe the Bulls can make Glen Rice cry some more Glen Davis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (lostfan @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 08:48 AM) KG out for playoffs. http://www.boston.com/sports/basketball/ce...rs_garnett.html This changes things quite a bit. Wow, what an incredible stroke of luck for the Bulls. Now the guards have to step up their defense on these guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 The Celtics are still quite dangerous, but we stand a better chance of them sans Garnett than we did against the Magic. Thank you Shaun Marion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (rangercal @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 09:48 AM) Glen Davis lol, him too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 John Salmons needs to lock down Paul Pierce, can't say that enough. I see Boston winning in 5 though. Don't think the Bulls can stop all of Rondo, Allen and Pierce, and they don't have a low post scorer to exploit no Garnett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (DBAHO @ Apr 16, 2009 -> 11:38 AM) John Salmons needs to lock down Paul Pierce, can't say that enough. I see Boston winning in 5 though. Don't think the Bulls can stop all of Rondo, Allen and Pierce, and they don't have a low post scorer to exploit no Garnett. I see your Rondo, Allen and Pierce and raise you Rose,Gordon,Salmons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts