Jump to content

Teen girls get pregnant on purpose, to raise kids together


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8...00.html?cnn=yes

 

Pregnancy Boom at Gloucester High

Wednesday, Jun. 18, 2008 By KATHLEEN KINGSBURY

 

As summer vacation begins, 17 girls at Gloucester High School are expecting babies—more than four times the number of pregnancies the 1,200-student school had last year. Some adults dismissed the statistic as a blip. Others blamed hit movies like Juno and Knocked Up for glamorizing young unwed mothers. But principal Joseph Sullivan knows at least part of the reason there's been such a spike in teen pregnancies in this Massachusetts fishing town. School officials started looking into the matter as early as October after an unusual number of girls began filing into the school clinic to find out if they were pregnant. By May, several students had returned multiple times to get pregnancy tests, and on hearing the results, "some girls seemed more upset when they weren't pregnant than when they were," Sullivan says. All it took was a few simple questions before nearly half the expecting students, none older than 16, confessed to making a pact to get pregnant and raise their babies together. Then the story got worse. "We found out one of the fathers is a 24-year-old homeless guy," the principal says, shaking his head.

 

The question of what to do next has divided this fiercely Catholic enclave. Even with national data showing a 3% rise in teen pregnancies in 2006—the first increase in 15 years—Gloucester isn't sure it wants to provide easier access to birth control. In any case, many residents worry that the problem goes much deeper. The past decade has been difficult for this mostly white, mostly blue-collar city (pop. 30,000). In Gloucester, perched on scenic Cape Ann, the economy has always depended on a strong fishing industry. But in recent years, such jobs have all but disappeared overseas, and with them much of the community's wherewithal. "Families are broken," says school superintendent Christopher Farmer. "Many of our young people are growing up directionless."

 

The girls who made the pregnancy pact—some of whom, according to Sullivan, reacted to the news that they were expecting with high fives and plans for baby showers—declined to be interviewed. So did their parents. But Amanda Ireland, who graduated from Gloucester High on June 8, thinks she knows why these girls wanted to get pregnant. Ireland, 18, gave birth her freshman year and says some of her now pregnant schoolmates regularly approached her in the hall, remarking how lucky she was to have a baby. "They're so excited to finally have someone to love them unconditionally," Ireland says. "I try to explain it's hard to feel loved when an infant is screaming to be fed at 3 a.m."

 

The high school has done perhaps too good a job of embracing young mothers. Sex-ed classes end freshman year at Gloucester, where teen parents are encouraged to take their children to a free on-site day-care center. Strollers mingle seamlessly in school hallways among cheerleaders and junior ROTC. "We're proud to help the mothers stay in school," says Sue Todd, CEO of Pathways for Children, which runs the day-care center.

 

But by May, after nurse practitioner Kim Daly had administered some 150 pregnancy tests at Gloucester High's student clinic, she and the clinic's medical director, Dr. Brian Orr, a local pediatrician, began to advocate prescribing contraceptives regardless of parental consent, a practice at about 15 public high schools in Massachusetts. Currently Gloucester teens must travel about 20 miles (30 km) to reach the nearest women's health clinic; younger girls have to get a ride or take the train and walk. But the notion of a school handing out birth control pills has met with hostility. Says Mayor Carolyn Kirk: "Dr. Orr and Ms. Daly have no right to decide this for our children." The pair resigned in protest on May 30.

 

Gloucester's elected school committee plans to vote later this summer on whether to provide contraceptives. But that won't do much to solve the issue of teens wanting to get pregnant. Says rising junior Kacia Lowe, who is a classmate of the pactmakers': "No one's offered them a better option." And better options may be a tall order in a city so uncertain of its future. —with reporting by Kimberley McLeod/New York

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a part of sex-ed for teen girls should be a full, unedited viewing of a birth without meds, including testimonials about the pain and suffering related to it from the mothers. Maybe that'll work.

 

Seriously though, i'm not one to judge parents (as i'm only 26 and not close to being one yet), but wouldn't this be something you somehow teach your kid - "hey, having babies at 16 just isn't smart...."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jun 19, 2008 -> 02:55 PM)
I think a part of sex-ed for teen girls should be a full, unedited viewing of a birth without meds, including testimonials about the pain and suffering related to it from the mothers. Maybe that'll work.

 

Seriously though, i'm not one to judge parents (as i'm only 26 and not close to being one yet), but wouldn't this be something you somehow teach your kid - "hey, having babies at 16 just isn't smart...."

 

 

IMO, It's easy to teach them... it's reinforcing it that's the hard part. "Sex ed" isn't a one time "the birds and the bees" talk as I know a lot of parents who think it is. These days most teens grow up in 2 parent working households and a lot of parents just don't have time to keep track of what their kids are doing. And when you have kids learning about sex from eachother, tv, the internet, or the movies this is what happens.

 

As for making girls watch an unedited (I do believe an edited version is shown in elective sex ed classes), undrugged birth.. that wont do anything. They are smart enough to know that all they have to do is ask for drugs. Besides, the birth is the easy part of the big picture. Forcing them to take care of a newborn for 48 hours with no help would be a better, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Steff @ Jun 19, 2008 -> 03:56 PM)
IMO, It's easy to teach them... it's reinforcing it that's the hard part. "Sex ed" isn't a one time "the birds and the bees" talk as I know a lot of parents who think it is. These days most teens grow up in 2 parent working households and a lot of parents just don't have time to keep track of what their kids are doing. And when you have kids learning about sex from eachother, tv, the internet, or the movies this is what happens.

 

As for making girls watch an unedited (I do believe an edited version is shown in elective sex ed classes), undrugged birth.. that wont do anything. They are smart enough to know that all they have to do is ask for drugs. Besides, the birth is the easy part of the big picture. Forcing them to take care of a newborn for 48 hours with no help would be a better, IMO.

It's certainly a wake up call (literally) to have teenagers have to watch a baby for a week. That certainly hits the point home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I ever have a daughter she isnt leaving the house. I honestly dont know what I would do if my 14/15 year old daughter had a baby with a 24 year old homeless man. This seems like a problem that will continue to get worse over time. I graduated high school in 2000 and can only recall a few pregnancies the whole 4 years. Actually, only one person from my group of friends from high school has a baby now. Something is terribly wrong when this many girls are trying to do something like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Jun 19, 2008 -> 04:44 PM)
I'm sure they think their time babysitting is comparable.

 

 

Oh yes. A few hours with detailed instructions and pre-made bottles is completely comparable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jun 19, 2008 -> 04:59 PM)
It's certainly a wake up call (literally) to have teenagers have to watch a baby for a week. That certainly hits the point home.

You need to check out comedian David Cross' bit about using the word "literally".

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jun 19, 2008 -> 03:59 PM)
It's certainly a wake up call (literally) to have teenagers have to watch a baby for a week. That certainly hits the point home.

 

I actually saw a reality show that might be interesting where they give babies to teenagers and film the hilarity. To me that is better birth control than any condom or pill could ever be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 20, 2008 -> 08:21 AM)
You need to check out comedian David Cross' bit about using the word "literally".

 

:P

Aww, come on...that's pretty much right. It's not a phone call, but in the sense that the baby calling out wakes you up, it works. It's not like the NFL announcer saying that some running back is "literally falling apart on the field." (At which I did literally scream at the tv.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 19, 2008 -> 01:15 PM)
Others blamed hit movies like Juno and Knocked Up for glamorizing young unwed mothers.

 

In a related story, the increased violence among animals in the local zoo has been blamed on the film "Kung Fu Panda"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...